Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Infectious Diseases Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2595-2604. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02654-0. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) has spread and colonized urban areas. The closer contact with humans can lead to wild boar-inflicted injuries. The objectives of this study are: 1) to systematically review the literature on wild boar-inflicted injuries; 2) to describe our wild boar-inflicted wound management protocol; and 3) to analyse the features, outcomes and complications of our case series.
First, a systematic search of the literature was performed using the PubMed (MEDLINE) electronic database. Then, our evidence-based wild boar-inflicted wound management protocol was described. Finally, a retrospective case series study including all the patients with wild boar-inflicted injuries attended in our Emergency Department (2020-2022) was analysed.
Fourteen studies (twelve case reports and two case series) were selected for the literature review. Our case series included 34 patients: 50.0% of them presented superficial wounds and 38.2% penetrating wounds. Most of the wounds occurred in the lower limbs (71.9%). Following our protocol, 30.0% of the wounds were primarily closed, the 70.0% of the patients received antibiotics (92.3% in penetrating injuries) and the 26.7% received an antitetanic vaccine. Only one patient (2.9%) presented a complication.
This study reports the first specific wild boar inflicted-wound management protocol, which led to a low complication rate. Open wounds affecting the lower limbs were the most common lesions. Care should be taken with penetrating tusk injuries. Wide-spectrum antibiotic and antitetanic treatments are recommended. Decisions on wound management should be taken case-by-case, while antirabies vaccination depends on the local status of the disease.
野猪(Sus scrofa)已经扩散并占据了城市地区。与人类的接触越密切,野猪造成的伤害就越严重。本研究的目的是:1)系统地回顾有关野猪造成的伤害的文献;2)描述我们的野猪致伤伤口管理方案;3)分析我们的野猪致伤病例系列的特征、结果和并发症。
首先,使用 PubMed(MEDLINE)电子数据库进行系统的文献检索。然后,描述了我们基于证据的野猪致伤伤口管理方案。最后,对 2020 年至 2022 年在我们急诊科就诊的所有野猪致伤者的回顾性病例系列研究进行了分析。
选择了 14 项研究(12 个病例报告和 2 个病例系列)进行文献回顾。我们的病例系列包括 34 名患者:50.0%的患者表现为浅表伤口,38.2%的患者表现为穿透性伤口。大多数伤口发生在下肢(71.9%)。根据我们的方案,30.0%的伤口一期缝合,70.0%的患者接受抗生素治疗(穿透伤中 92.3%),26.7%的患者接受破伤风抗毒素疫苗接种。只有 1 名患者(2.9%)出现并发症。
本研究报告了第一个专门的野猪致伤伤口管理方案,该方案导致并发症发生率较低。影响下肢的开放性伤口是最常见的损伤。应注意穿透獠牙的损伤。建议使用广谱抗生素和破伤风抗毒素治疗。伤口处理的决定应根据具体情况而定,而狂犬病疫苗接种取决于疾病的当地状况。