Fischer C, Klauke F, Schenk P, Bauerfeld H, Kobbe P, Mendel T
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Strasse 165, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2963-2973. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02629-1. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
The aim of this study were the retrospective evaluation of the compressive effect and complication rates of transsacral stabilization of osteoporosis-associated sacral fragility fractures in 106 patients using three different implants (6.0 mm sacral bar, n = 32; 7.3 mm screw, n = 26; 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System, n = 48) with regard to the image morphological and clinical-perioperative outcome.
For this purpose, the sacral width was determined preoperatively and postoperatively using multiplanar CT reconstructions and correlated with the measured bone density (HU). The results were compared with each other on an implant-specific basis.
A significant compressive effect was found for all implants (6.0 mm sacral bar 7.1 ± 3.4 mm, 7.3 mm screw 6.9 ± 1.8 mm, 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System 8 ± 2.4 mm). No implant-specific difference in compression could be detected. Overall, the washers broke into the iliac cortex in 9% of cases. The subgroups did not differ significantly in this respect (6.0 mm sacral bar: 4 [13%], 7.3 mm screw 1 [1%], 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System (5 [10%], p = 0.581). A correlation between the degree of osteoporosis and the compressive effect could not be demonstrated. Significant implant-specific differences were found in the incision-suture time, with only ø0:39 ± 0:13 h required for implantation of the 7.5 mm ISG Rod System (6.0 mm sacral bar: ø1:09 ± 0:22 h, 7.3 mm screw: ø0:55 ± 0:20 h). The fluoroscopy time was significantly lower with the 7.3 mm screw (ø0:57 ± 0:23 min) and the 7.5 mm ISG Rod System (ø0:42 ± 00:17 min) than with the 6.0 mm sacral bar (ø1:36 ± 0:46 min).
A significant compressive effect was demonstrated with all three implants. No implant-specific complications or surgical site complications were identified in either the overall cohort or the subgroups. The 7.5 mm ISG Rod System shows advantages with regard to the duration of surgery and fluoroscopy.
本研究旨在回顾性评估106例骨质疏松性骶骨脆性骨折患者使用三种不同植入物(6.0mm骶骨棒,n = 32;7.3mm螺钉,n = 26;7.5mm ISG棒系统,n = 48)进行经骶骨稳定手术的压缩效果和并发症发生率,同时评估图像形态学和临床围手术期结果。
为此,术前和术后使用多平面CT重建确定骶骨宽度,并与测量的骨密度(HU)相关联。结果在植入物特异性基础上相互比较。
所有植入物均发现有显著的压缩效果(6.0mm骶骨棒7.1±3.4mm,7.3mm螺钉6.9±1.8mm,7.5mm ISG棒系统8±2.4mm)。未检测到植入物特异性的压缩差异。总体而言,9%的病例中垫圈穿入髂骨皮质。各亚组在这方面无显著差异(6.0mm骶骨棒:4例[13%],7.3mm螺钉1例[1%],7.5mm ISG棒系统5例[10%],p = 0.581)。未发现骨质疏松程度与压缩效果之间存在相关性。在切口缝合时间方面发现了显著的植入物特异性差异,7.5mm ISG棒系统植入仅需ø0:39±0:13小时(6.0mm骶骨棒:ø1:09±0:22小时,7.3mm螺钉:ø0:55±0:20小时)。7.3mm螺钉(ø0:57±0:23分钟)和7.5mm ISG棒系统(ø0:42±00:17分钟)的透视时间显著低于6.0mm骶骨棒(ø1:36±0:46分钟)。
所有三种植入物均显示出显著的压缩效果。在总体队列或亚组中均未发现植入物特异性并发症或手术部位并发症。7.5mm ISG棒系统在手术时间和透视时间方面显示出优势。