Gewiess Jan, Albers Christoph Emanuel, Keel Marius Johann Baptist, Frihagen Frede, Rommens Pol Maria, Bastian Johannes Dominik
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Spine-pelvis AG, Medical School, University of Zurich, Trauma Center Hirslanden, Clinic Hirslanden, Witellikerstrasse 40, CH-8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 21;145(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4.
Fragility and insufficiency fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and sacrum (SIF) are increasingly prevalent, particularly among the elderly, due to weakened bone structure and low-energy trauma. Chronic instability from these fractures causes persistent pain, limited mobility, and significant reductions in quality of life. Hospitalization is often required, with substantial risks of loss of independence (64-89%) and high mortality rates (13-27%). While conservative treatment is possible, surgical intervention is preferred for unstable or progressive fractures. FFP and SIF are primarily associated with osteoporosis, with 71% of patients not receiving adequate secondary fracture prevention. Imaging modalities play a crucial role in diagnosis. Conventional radiography often misses sacral fractures, while computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for evaluating fracture morphology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the highest sensitivity (99%), essential for detecting complex fractures and assessing bone edema. Advanced techniques like dual-energy CT and SPECT/CT provide further diagnostic value. Rommens and Hofmann's classification system categorizes FFP based on anterior and posterior pelvic ring involvement, guiding treatment strategies. Progression from stable fractures (FFP I-II) to highly unstable patterns (FFP IV) is common and influenced by factors like pelvic morphology, bone density, and sarcopenia. Treatment varies based on fracture type and stability. Non-displaced posterior fractures can be managed with sacroplasty or screw fixation, while displaced or unstable patterns often require more invasive methods, such as triangular lumbopelvic fixation or transsacral bar osteosynthesis. Sacroplasty provides significant pain relief but has limited stabilizing capacity, while screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate improves fixation in osteoporotic bones. Anterior ring fractures may be treated with retrograde transpubic screws or symphyseal plating, with biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes depending on fixation techniques. FFP and SIF management requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure stability, pain relief, and functional recovery, emphasizing early diagnosis, tailored surgical strategies, and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures.
骨盆脆性骨折和不全骨折(FFP)以及骶骨应力性骨折(SIF)越来越普遍,尤其是在老年人中,这是由于骨骼结构变弱和低能量创伤所致。这些骨折引起的慢性不稳定会导致持续疼痛、活动受限以及生活质量显著下降。通常需要住院治疗,存在丧失独立能力的重大风险(64 - 89%)和高死亡率(13 - 27%)。虽然保守治疗是可行的,但对于不稳定或进展性骨折,手术干预更为可取。FFP和SIF主要与骨质疏松症相关,71%的患者未接受充分的继发性骨折预防。影像学检查方法在诊断中起着关键作用。传统X线摄影常常漏诊骶骨骨折,而计算机断层扫描(CT)是评估骨折形态的金标准。磁共振成像(MRI)具有最高的敏感性(99%),对于检测复杂骨折和评估骨水肿至关重要。双能CT和SPECT/CT等先进技术具有进一步的诊断价值。罗曼斯和霍夫曼的分类系统根据骨盆前后环受累情况对FFP进行分类,指导治疗策略。从稳定骨折(FFP I - II)进展为高度不稳定型(FFP IV)很常见,且受骨盆形态、骨密度和肌肉减少症等因素影响。治疗方法因骨折类型和稳定性而异。无移位的后部骨折可采用骶骨成形术或螺钉固定治疗,而移位或不稳定型骨折通常需要更具侵入性的方法,如三角腰骶部固定或经骶骨棒骨合成术。骶骨成形术可显著缓解疼痛,但稳定能力有限,而用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强螺钉可改善骨质疏松性骨的固定。前环骨折可采用逆行经耻骨螺钉或耻骨联合钢板固定治疗,生物力学稳定性和长期疗效取决于固定技术。FFP和SIF的管理需要多学科方法,以确保稳定性、缓解疼痛和功能恢复,强调早期诊断、量身定制的手术策略以及骨质疏松性骨折的二级预防。