• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' Expectations of Doctors' Clinical Competencies in the Digital Health Care Era: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study Among Patients.患者在数字医疗时代对医生临床能力的期望:一项针对患者的定性半结构式访谈研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 27;11:e51972. doi: 10.2196/51972.
2
Doctors' Personal Preference and Adoption of Mobile Apps to Communicate with Patients in China: Qualitative Study.中国医生个人偏好与采用移动应用程序与患者沟通的情况:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 10;12:e49040. doi: 10.2196/49040.
3
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis of the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Primary Health Care in the Sub-Saharan African Region: Qualitative Study.撒哈拉以南非洲地区基层医疗中数字健康技术使用的优势、劣势、机遇和威胁分析:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 7;25:e45224. doi: 10.2196/45224.
4
Understanding Older Adults' Experiences With a Digital Health Platform in General Practice: Qualitative Interview Study.理解老年人在全科医疗中使用数字健康平台的体验:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Aug 30;7:e59168. doi: 10.2196/59168.
5
The role of economic, educational and social resources in supporting the use of digital health technologies by people with T2D: a qualitative study.经济、教育和社会资源在支持2型糖尿病患者使用数字健康技术方面的作用:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10325-7.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
What factors shape doctors' trustworthiness? Patients' perspectives in the context of hypertension care in rural Tanzania.哪些因素塑造了医生的可信度?坦桑尼亚农村地区高血压护理背景下的患者观点。
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Aug;20(3):5826. doi: 10.22605/RRH5826. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
8
Doctors', Patients' and Physician Associates' Perceptions of the Physician Associate Role in the Emergency Department.医生、患者和医师助理对急诊医师助理角色的看法。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14135. doi: 10.1111/hex.14135.
9
Value of Engagement in Digital Health Technology Research: Evidence Across 6 Unique Cohort Studies.参与数字健康技术研究的价值:6 项独特队列研究的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 3;26:e57827. doi: 10.2196/57827.
10
Inequalities in the Ability for People With Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes to Adapt to the Reduction in In-Person Health Support and Increased Use of Digital Support During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Qualitative Study.2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者在新冠疫情期间及之后适应面对面健康支持减少和数字支持使用增加的能力不平等:定性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Jun 25;9:e55201. doi: 10.2196/55201.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status of older people with chronic diseases adopting digital health technologies: A scoping review.患有慢性病的老年人采用数字健康技术的现状:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 4;11:20552076251348578. doi: 10.1177/20552076251348578. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximizing the value of patient and public involvement in the digital health co-design process: A qualitative descriptive study with design leaders and patient-public partners.最大化患者和公众参与数字健康协同设计过程的价值:一项针对设计领导者和患者-公众合作伙伴的定性描述性研究
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 25;2(10):e0000213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000213. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Application of Telemedicine in the Ambulance for Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.远程医疗在脑卒中患者救护车中的应用:系统评价。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Dec;38(6):774-779. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006519. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
A Review of Telemedicine Guidelines in the South-East Asia Region.东南亚地区远程医疗指南综述
Telemed Rep. 2023 Sep 25;4(1):271-278. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0040. eCollection 2023.
4
The diversity of providers' and consumers' views of virtual versus inpatient care provision: a qualitative study.提供者和消费者对虚拟与住院护理提供的看法的多样性:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 4;23(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09715-x.
5
Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: A qualitative exploration of the surgeon perspective.人工智能在骨科领域的应用:外科医生视角的定性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 16;102(24):e34071. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034071.
6
Evaluation of the usability of the digital platform navigator KardioUp for the journey of patients with chronic heart failure.评估数字平台导航仪 KardioUp 对慢性心力衰竭患者旅程的可用性。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024 Jan-Feb;75:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
7
Roles and Competencies of Doctors in Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Qualitative Analysis Through Physician Interviews.人工智能实施中医生的角色与能力:通过医生访谈进行的定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 18;7:e46020. doi: 10.2196/46020.
8
Digital competencies for Singapore's national medical school curriculum: a qualitative study.新加坡国立医学院课程的数字能力:一项定性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2211820. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2211820.
9
Funding Life-Extension Research.资助延长寿命的研究。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2023 Apr 10;13(12). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041208.
10
Understanding Prospective Physicians' Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence in Their Future Medical Practice: Configurational Analysis.了解未来医生在其未来医疗实践中使用人工智能的意图:组态分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Mar 22;9:e45631. doi: 10.2196/45631.

患者在数字医疗时代对医生临床能力的期望:一项针对患者的定性半结构式访谈研究。

Patients' Expectations of Doctors' Clinical Competencies in the Digital Health Care Era: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study Among Patients.

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 27;11:e51972. doi: 10.2196/51972.

DOI:10.2196/51972
PMID:39190915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11387909/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital technologies have impacted health care delivery globally, and are increasingly being deployed in clinical practice. However, there is limited research on patients' expectations of doctors' clinical competencies when using digital health care technologies (DHTs) in medical care. Understanding these expectations can reveal competency gaps, enhance patient confidence, and contribute to digital innovation initiatives.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores patients' perceptions of doctors' use of DHTs in clinical care. Using Singapore as a case study, it examines patients' expectations regarding doctors' communication, diagnosis, and treatment skills when using telemedicine, health apps, wearable devices, electronic health records, and artificial intelligence.

METHODS

Findings were drawn from individual semistructured interviews with patients from outpatient clinics. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five participants from different backgrounds and with various chronic conditions participated in the study. They expected doctors to be adept in handling medical data from apps and wearable devices. For telemedicine, participants expected a level of assessment of their medical conditions akin to in-person consultations. In addition, they valued doctors recognizing when a physical examination was necessary. Interestingly, eye contact was appreciated but deemed nonessential by participants across all age bands when electronic health records were used, as they valued the doctor's efficiency more than eye contact. Nonetheless, participants emphasized the need for empathy throughout the clinical encounter regardless of DHT use. Furthermore, younger participants had a greater expectation for DHT use among doctors compared to older ones, who preferred DHTs as a complement rather than a replacement for clinical skills. The former expected doctors to be knowledgeable about the algorithms, principles, and purposes of DHTs such as artificial intelligence technologies to better assist them in diagnosis and treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

By identifying patients' expectations of doctors amid increasing health care digitalization, this study highlights that while basic clinical skills remain crucial in the digital age, the role of clinicians needs to evolve with the introduction of DHTs. It has also provided insights into how DHTs can be integrated effectively into clinical settings, aligning with patients' expectations and preferences. Overall, the findings offer a framework for high-income countries to harness DHTs in enhancing health care delivery in the digital era.

摘要

背景

数字技术已在全球范围内对医疗服务产生影响,并越来越多地应用于临床实践。然而,关于患者在医疗中使用数字医疗保健技术(DHT)时对医生临床能力的期望,相关研究有限。了解这些期望可以揭示能力差距,增强患者信心,并为数字创新举措做出贡献。

目的

本研究探讨了患者对医生在临床护理中使用 DHT 的看法。本研究以新加坡为例,考察了患者对医生在使用远程医疗、健康应用程序、可穿戴设备、电子健康记录和人工智能时的沟通、诊断和治疗技能的期望。

方法

研究结果来自于对门诊患者的个别半结构化访谈。参与者是通过目的性抽样招募的。数据使用主题分析进行定性分析。

结果

本研究共招募了来自不同背景和患有各种慢性疾病的 25 名参与者。他们期望医生能够熟练处理来自应用程序和可穿戴设备的医疗数据。对于远程医疗,参与者期望医生对他们的病情进行评估,其水平与面对面咨询相当。此外,他们希望医生在需要时进行体格检查。有趣的是,在使用电子健康记录时,参与者在各个年龄段都欣赏眼神交流,但认为其非必要,因为他们更看重医生的效率而非眼神交流。然而,无论是否使用 DHT,参与者都强调在整个临床过程中需要有同理心。此外,年轻参与者比年长参与者更期望医生使用 DHT,而年长参与者则更喜欢将 DHT 作为临床技能的补充,而非替代。前者期望医生了解人工智能等 DHT 的算法、原理和用途,以便更好地帮助他们进行诊断和治疗。

结论

通过在医疗保健数字化日益普及的情况下确定患者对医生的期望,本研究强调,尽管基本临床技能在数字时代仍然至关重要,但随着 DHT 的引入,临床医生的角色需要发生演变。它还为如何在临床环境中有效整合 DHT 提供了思路,使它们与患者的期望和偏好保持一致。总体而言,研究结果为高收入国家在数字时代利用 DHT 提高医疗服务提供了框架。