• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

'IHPBA-APHPBA 临床实践指南': 胆囊癌国际 Delphi 共识推荐意见。

'IHPBA-APHPBA clinical practice guidelines': international Delphi consensus recommendations for gallbladder cancer.

机构信息

Continental Cancer Centre, Continental Hospitals, Hyderabad, India; Dept. of Surgical Oncology Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre and SL Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2024 Nov;26(11):1311-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411
PMID:39191539
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Delphi consensus study was carried out under the auspices of the International and Asia-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Associations (IHPBA-APHPBA) to develop practice guidelines for management of gallbladder cancer (GBC) globally.

METHOD

GBC experts from 17 countries, spanning 6 continents, participated in a hybrid four-round Delphi consensus development process. The methodology involved email, online consultations, and in-person discussions. Sixty eight clinical questions (CQs) covering various domains related to GBC, were administered to the experts. A consensus recommendation was accepted only when endorsed by more than 75% of the participating experts.

RESULTS

Out of the sixty experts invited initially to participate in the consensus process 45 (75%) responded to the invitation. The consensus was achieved in 92.6% (63/68) of the CQs. Consensus covers epidemiological aspects of GBC, early, incidental and advanced GBC management, definitions for radical GBC resections, the extent of liver resection, lymph node dissection, and definitions of borderline resectable and locally advanced GBC.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first international Delphi consensus on GBC. These recommendations provide uniform terminology and practical clinical guidelines on the current management of GBC. Unresolved contentious issues like borderline resectable/locally advanced GBC need to be addressed by future clinical studies.

摘要

背景

本次德尔菲共识研究由国际肝胆胰协会联盟(IHPBA)和亚太地区肝胆胰协会联盟(APHPBA)主办,旨在制定全球胆囊癌(GBC)管理实践指南。

方法

来自六大洲 17 个国家的 GBC 专家参与了四轮混合德尔菲共识开发过程。该方法涉及电子邮件、在线咨询和现场讨论。向专家们提出了 68 个涵盖与 GBC 相关的各种领域的临床问题(CQ)。只有超过 75%的参与专家认可,才能接受共识推荐。

结果

最初邀请了 60 名专家参加共识过程,其中 45 名(75%)专家回应了邀请。在 68 个 CQ 中,有 92.6%(63/68)达成了共识。共识涵盖了 GBC 的流行病学方面、早期、偶然和晚期 GBC 管理、根治性 GBC 切除术的定义、肝切除术的范围、淋巴结清扫术,以及边界可切除和局部晚期 GBC 的定义。

结论

这是首次关于 GBC 的国际德尔菲共识。这些建议提供了关于 GBC 现行管理的统一术语和实用临床指南。需要通过未来的临床研究来解决边界可切除/局部晚期 GBC 等有争议的未决问题。

相似文献

1
'IHPBA-APHPBA clinical practice guidelines': international Delphi consensus recommendations for gallbladder cancer.'IHPBA-APHPBA 临床实践指南': 胆囊癌国际 Delphi 共识推荐意见。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Nov;26(11):1311-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
Managing the incidentally detected gallbladder cancer: algorithms and controversies.偶然发现的胆囊癌的处理:算法和争议。
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S108-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.367. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
3
Laparoscopic Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer: An Expert Consensus Statement.胆囊癌的腹腔镜手术:专家共识声明
Dig Surg. 2019;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1159/000486207. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Incidental gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: managing an unexpected finding.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中偶然发现的胆囊癌:处理意外发现。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 14;18(30):4019-27. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i30.4019.
5
Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Lymphadenectomy without Liver Resection for T1/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.T1/T2 期胆囊癌行扩大淋巴结清扫术而不进行肝脏切除术的肿瘤学结果。
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Dec;60(12):1138-1145. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1138.
6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin followed by radical liver resection versus immediate radical liver resection alone with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in incidentally detected gallbladder carcinoma after simple cholecystectomy or in front of radical resection of BTC (ICC/ECC) - a phase III study of the German registry of incidental gallbladder carcinoma platform (GR)- the AIO/ CALGP/ ACO- GAIN-trial.新辅助化疗联合吉西他滨和顺铂后根治性肝切除术与单纯胆囊切除术后或根治性 BTC 切除术前单纯根治性肝切除术或辅助化疗与或不辅助化疗在偶然发现的胆囊癌中的比较(ICC/ECC) - 德国偶然发现的胆囊癌平台(GR)登记处的 III 期研究- AIO/CALGP/ACO-GAIN 试验。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6610-4.
7
Current status and progress in laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder carcinoma.胆囊癌腹腔镜手术的现状与进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 28;29(16):2369-2379. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i16.2369.
8
Radical cholecystectomy without liver resection for peritoneal side early incidental gallbladder cancer.行胆囊切除术而不做肝切除术治疗早期偶发胆囊腹膜侧癌。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 28;30(32):3739-3742. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i32.3739.
9
Current management of incidental gallbladder cancer: A review.偶然发现的胆囊癌的当前治疗方法:综述。
Int J Surg. 2022 Feb;98:106234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106234. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
10
Incidental gallbladder cancer by the AFC-GBC-2009 Study Group.AFC-GBC-2009 研究组偶然发现的胆囊癌。
World J Surg. 2011 Aug;35(8):1887-97. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1134-3.

引用本文的文献

1
An end-to-end interpretable machine-learning-based framework for early-stage diagnosis of gallbladder cancer using multi-modality medical data.一种基于机器学习的端到端可解释框架,用于利用多模态医学数据对胆囊癌进行早期诊断。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):1178. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14462-9.
2
Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: A Case Report of a Locally Advanced Carcinoma With a Positive Outcome.胆囊腺鳞癌:1例局部晚期癌且预后良好的病例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jun 2;17(6):e85218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85218. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Assessment of nodal staging and risk factors for nodal involvement in gallbladder cancer.
胆囊癌淋巴结分期及淋巴结受累危险因素的评估
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf056.
4
De-escalating surgical treatment in low stage gallbladder cancer.降低低分期胆囊癌的手术治疗强度
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):1038-1040. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-576. Epub 2024 Nov 14.