Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Institute for International Programs, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06766-8.
Improving the quality of breastfeeding counselling delivered by primary care providers can improve breastfeeding outcomes and ultimately reduce mortality and morbidity of children and mothers. Accurate data on coverage and quality of primary care breastfeeding counselling is essential for monitoring progress; however, global and national indicators are limited. To help address this gap, this study validated indicators of receipt and quality of breastfeeding counselling during routine consultations for infant care at seven primary health facilities across Kosovo.
Mothers' reports of breastfeeding counselling received during routine consultations for their infants (0-12 months of age) were collected by exit interview in 2019 and 2021 (n = 609). Responses were compared against direct observation of their consultation using a structured checklist (reference standard) by a trained third-party observer at the primary care facility. We assessed 13 indicators; ten were related to the receipt and content of breastfeeding counselling, and three were specific to the provider's interpersonal skills. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) to determine individual-level reporting accuracy.
Ten indicators had an agreement rate above 70% and seven indicators had high overall individual-level validity (AUC ≥ 0.7). High prevalence indicators recorded high sensitivity and low specificity, and the inverse for low prevalence indicators. More subjective indicators were less reliable, e.g., mothers over-reported the prevalence of all three indicators related to providers' interpersonal skills.
This study offers evidence on breastfeeding counselling quality by validating maternal reports of whether a provider discussed breastfeeding, the clinical content of that counselling, and how it was delivered. It is also situated in a primary care setting within a fragile state of which there is limited evidence. We observed that mothers reported accurately when asked directly to recall breastfeeding counselling services received. However, there is a need to further validate subjective questions about interpersonal skills and other measures for the 'experience of care' quality dimension.
提高初级保健提供者提供的母乳喂养咨询质量可以改善母乳喂养结果,并最终降低儿童和母亲的死亡率和发病率。准确的数据覆盖范围和初级保健母乳喂养咨询质量是监测进展的必要条件; 然而,全球和国家指标是有限的。为了帮助解决这一差距,本研究在科索沃的七个初级保健设施中验证了常规婴儿护理咨询期间接受和母乳喂养咨询质量的指标。
通过 2019 年和 2021 年的出口访谈收集了母亲在常规婴儿咨询期间(0-12 个月大)接受母乳喂养咨询的报告(n=609)。通过在初级保健设施由经过培训的第三方观察者使用结构化检查表(参考标准)对其咨询进行直接观察,将受访者的回复与受访者的回复进行比较。我们评估了 13 个指标; 其中 10 个与母乳喂养咨询的接收和内容有关,3 个与提供者的人际技能有关。我们计算了敏感性、特异性和接收器操作曲线下面积(AUC),以确定个体水平报告的准确性。
十个指标的协议率高于 70%,七个指标具有较高的整体个体水平有效性(AUC≥0.7)。高流行率指标记录了高敏感性和低特异性,而低流行率指标则相反。更主观的指标不太可靠,例如,母亲对所有三个与提供者的人际技能相关的指标的流行率都有过高的报告。
本研究通过验证母亲是否讨论过母乳喂养、该母乳喂养咨询的临床内容以及提供方式,为母乳喂养咨询质量提供了证据。它还位于一个脆弱国家的初级保健环境中,该国家的证据有限。我们观察到,当直接要求母亲回忆接受的母乳喂养咨询服务时,母亲会准确地报告。然而,需要进一步验证关于人际技能的主观问题和其他“护理体验”质量维度的措施。