Cooney L M, Fries B E
Med Care. 1985 Feb;23(2):123-32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198502000-00003.
A companion article describes the development of a patient classification system for long-term care patients, Resource Utilization Groups (RUGs). Three potential limitations of this system and its development are addressed here: the use of a subjectively determined dependent variable, geographic limitation of the data to Connecticut skilled nursing facilities, and limited assessment of the quality of the facilities studied. Additional systems of Resource Utilization Groups were derived, using the same clustering technique but employing two separate data sets from the Battelle Human Affairs Research Center. These data bases provided an objective dependent variable, wide geographic distribution of both skilled nursing facilities and intermediate care facilities, and homes specifically selected on the basis of quality. The RUGs derived from the two sets of Battelle data and the initial RUG system showed remarkable similarity in their patient groupings and in the case-mix indexes developed for nursing homes. The concurrence of the results obtained for these three systems greatly strengthens the basis for the use of this classification system as a case mix measure for long-term care.
一篇配套文章描述了针对长期护理患者的患者分类系统——资源利用组(RUGs)的开发。本文讨论了该系统及其开发过程中的三个潜在局限性:使用主观确定的因变量、数据仅限于康涅狄格州的熟练护理设施的地理局限性,以及对所研究设施质量的评估有限。使用相同的聚类技术,但采用巴特尔人类事务研究中心的两个独立数据集,得出了其他资源利用组系统。这些数据库提供了一个客观的因变量、熟练护理设施和中级护理设施广泛的地理分布,以及根据质量专门挑选的机构。从巴特尔的两组数据中得出的资源利用组与最初的资源利用组系统在患者分组以及为疗养院制定的病例组合指数方面表现出显著的相似性。这三个系统所得结果的一致性极大地加强了将该分类系统用作长期护理病例组合衡量标准的基础。