Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):1005. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04766-w.
BACKGROUND: It is still unclear whether the trabecular structure of the jaw is different in individuals with hypodontia than in those without hypodontia; this is important for clinicians. The aim was to determine whether the mandibular trabecular bone structure of children and adolescents with hypodontia differs from the control group by using the fractal analysis (FA) method in this study. METHODS: A total of 138 panoramic radiographs of 69 cases and 69 control subjects (mean age 13.2 ± 10.1) were evaluated. The age and gender of subjects in the case and control groups were matched. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were selected from the panoramic radiographs. ROI1 refers to the center of the ramus rising above the mandibular foramen. ROI2 refers to the area between the apical level of the mandibular molar and the upper border of the mandibular canal. ROI3, the missing tooth region, refers to the apical third of the mesial side of the erupting or fully erupted permanent mandibular first molar. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were used. p < 0.05 was accepted for the significance value. RESULTS: The mean fractal dimension (FD) values of ROI1, ROI2, and ROI3 were 1,25, 1,20, and 1,13, respectively. The means FD values obtained from the ramus region were higher than the other regions (p < 0.05). The FD values did not differ significantly according to gender and age (p > 0.05). The FD values of the case group were lower than the control group for ROI3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the mandibular trabecular bone quality of pediatric patients with one missing tooth was different from the healthy group. The difference in the mean FD values from the ROIs indicates that the ramus has a denser structure than the mandibular corpus. Clinicians should factor this into their dental treatment planning process.
背景:下颌骨的小梁结构在缺牙患者和无缺牙患者之间是否存在差异尚不清楚;这对临床医生来说很重要。本研究旨在通过分形分析(FA)方法确定缺牙儿童和青少年的下颌骨小梁骨结构是否与对照组不同。
方法:共评估了 69 例病例和 69 例对照(平均年龄 13.2±10.1)的 138 张全景片。病例组和对照组的年龄和性别相匹配。从全景片中选择 3 个感兴趣区域(ROI)。ROI1 指位于下颌孔上方升支的中心。ROI2 指下颌磨牙根尖水平与下颌管上缘之间的区域。ROI3 为缺牙区,指正在萌出或完全萌出的下颌第一恒磨牙近中侧根尖的第三段。采用 Mann-Whitney U 和 Wilcoxon 检验。显著性值为 p<0.05。
结果:ROI1、ROI2 和 ROI3 的平均分形维数(FD)值分别为 1.25、1.20 和 1.13。支区获得的平均 FD 值高于其他区域(p<0.05)。FD 值与性别和年龄无关(p>0.05)。ROI3 的病例组 FD 值低于对照组(p<0.05)。
结论:本研究结果表明,单个缺牙患儿下颌骨小梁骨质量与健康组不同。ROIs 平均 FD 值的差异表明,升支的结构比下颌体更致密。临床医生在制定牙科治疗计划时应考虑这一点。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009-10-16
Oral Radiol. 2021-1
BMC Oral Health. 2025-6-3
J Clin Med. 2025-3-6
Niger J Clin Pract. 2024-2-1
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021-12-1
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022-1-1
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022-2