• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨健康和福利维度 eliciting 公众偏好:SIPHER-7 的等效收入值集。

Eliciting public preferences across health and wellbeing dimensions: An equivalent income value set for SIPHER-7.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

School of Economics, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2024 Dec;33(12):2723-2741. doi: 10.1002/hec.4890. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4890
PMID:39192456
Abstract

The call for "health and wellbeing in all policies" requires a preference-based measure that collapses multi-dimensional health and wellbeing into a single index, such as equivalent income. We aim to elicit preferences of the UK general public to estimate a value set for a suite of seven commonly used wellbeing indicators including health, income, and other dimensions, in terms of equivalent income. Secondly, we examine heterogeneous preferences by gender, by age, and by income. Thirdly, we explore the stability of preferences, since the survey took place amid the pandemic, possibly affecting preferences over health and wellbeing. Effects of attrition and of time are distinguished. Data were collected online across two waves using Discrete Choice Experiments through an internet panel (N1 = 3362; and N2 = 3357). The regression coefficients for all the ordered attribute levels have the expected sign, are significant, and ordered. Equivalent income was found to vary up to 10% by gender and by age (both significant) and 4% by income (not significant), while the effect of time was up to 16% (significant). The study facilitates the calculation of overall wellbeing in terms of equivalent income based on the preferences of the UK public, where the relevant wellbeing indicators are available.

摘要

“全政策健康福利”的呼吁需要一种基于偏好的衡量标准,将多维健康和福利综合为一个单一指数,例如等效收入。我们旨在通过英国公众的偏好来估算一套常用的七种福利指标(包括健康、收入和其他维度)的等价收入价值。其次,我们将按性别、年龄和收入对异质偏好进行检验。第三,我们探讨了偏好的稳定性,因为调查是在大流行期间进行的,这可能会影响对健康和福利的偏好。区分了损耗和时间的影响。数据通过互联网小组使用离散选择实验在线收集了两波(N1=3362;N2=3357)。所有有序属性级别的回归系数都具有预期的符号、显著且有序。发现等效收入因性别和年龄(均显著)而异,最高可达 10%,因收入而异,最高可达 4%(不显著),而时间的影响最高可达 16%(显著)。该研究为根据英国公众的偏好,在有相关福利指标的情况下,按等效收入计算整体福利提供了便利。

相似文献

1
Eliciting public preferences across health and wellbeing dimensions: An equivalent income value set for SIPHER-7.跨健康和福利维度 eliciting 公众偏好:SIPHER-7 的等效收入值集。
Health Econ. 2024 Dec;33(12):2723-2741. doi: 10.1002/hec.4890. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Pandemic Fatigue and Preferences for COVID-19 Public Health and Social Measures in China: Nationwide Discrete Choice Experiment.大流行疲劳与对中国 COVID-19 公共卫生和社会措施的偏好:全国离散选择试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 27;10:e45840. doi: 10.2196/45840.
3
Equal access for equal need: Eliciting public preferences for access to health treatment by employment status.平等需求,平等机会:通过就业状况了解公众对获取医疗待遇的偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:246-255. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine Preferences in General Populations in Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Discrete Choice Experiment.加拿大、德国、英国和美国普通人群对 COVID-19 疫苗的偏好:离散选择实验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 16;10:e57242. doi: 10.2196/57242.
5
Nurses' preferences for working in Uber-style 'Internet plus' nursing services: A discrete choice experiment.护士对从事优步式“互联网 +”护理服务工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Jan;161:104920. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104920. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
6
The employment preferences of young people in Canada: a discrete choice experiment.加拿大年轻人的就业偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21515-y.
7
Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.选择与分配:用于引出社会偏好的离散选择实验和恒定总和配对比较
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1227-40. doi: 10.1111/hex.12098. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
8
Ranking of meal preferences and interactions with demographic characteristics: a discrete choice experiment in young adults.饮食偏好排序及与人口特征的相互关系:一项针对青年成年人的离散选择实验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Dec 1;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01059-7.
9
What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice.人们更喜欢哪些健康保险计划?保费与医疗机构选择之间的权衡。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Eliciting women's preferences for place of child birth at a peri-urban setting in Nairobi, Kenya: A discrete choice experiment.在肯尼亚内罗毕的城郊地区,通过离散选择实验了解女性对分娩地点的偏好。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0242149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242149. eCollection 2020.