Metushi Imir G, Wakefield Michael R, Lynch Kara, Stone Judy, Fitzgerald Robert L
Department of Pathology, Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health Systems, San Diego, CA, United States.
Waters Corp., Pleasanton, CA, United States.
Clin Mass Spectrom. 2018 Feb 14;8:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinms.2018.02.002. eCollection 2018 Apr.
During the reproducibility validation for a time-of-flight (TOF) high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) method set up to detect 61 drugs of abuse commonly encountered in the toxicology laboratory, it was noticed that, a number of compounds were not identified correctly during the between run analysis; the most difficult compounds to identify were norpropoxyphene, morphine, norbuprenorphine, nortriptyline, EDDP and tramadol. In subsequent patient comparison studies, screening a panel of 338 analytes, the TOF-HRMS method correctly identified 211 analytes over two runs, but did not identify 127. A total of 11 false positive results were identified by manual review of the data to be the result of confirmation ion signal-to-noise ratio(s) < 3, although one false positive that was difficult to resolve (i.e., identification of maprotiline as amitriptyline) was due to similar fragment ions and retention times. The TOF-HRMS method showed reasonable agreement with LC-MS/MS results, but there were a number of discrepant results. Additionally, the TOF-HRMS did detect five compounds missed by the LC-MS/MS methods. This extensive validation effort highlights the difficulty of analysis for certain compounds that are likely to require additional follow up prior to reporting a positive result, especially at low and high concentrations, regardless of the type of instrumentation involved.
在对一种飞行时间(TOF)高分辨率质谱(HRMS)方法进行重现性验证期间,该方法用于检测毒理学实验室中常见的61种滥用药物,结果发现,在批间分析过程中,有多种化合物未被正确鉴定;最难鉴定的化合物是去甲丙氧芬、吗啡、去甲丁丙诺啡、去甲替林、EDDP和曲马多。在随后的患者比较研究中,对一组338种分析物进行筛选,TOF-HRMS方法在两次运行中正确鉴定出211种分析物,但未鉴定出127种。通过人工审查数据,共确定了11例假阳性结果,其原因是确证离子信噪比<3,不过有一个难以解决的假阳性结果(即将马普替林鉴定为阿米替林)是由于碎片离子和保留时间相似所致。TOF-HRMS方法与液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)结果显示出合理的一致性,但仍有一些不一致的结果。此外,TOF-HRMS确实检测到了LC-MS/MS方法遗漏的5种化合物。这项广泛的验证工作凸显了对某些化合物进行分析的难度,在报告阳性结果之前,可能需要进行额外的后续检测,尤其是在低浓度和高浓度时,无论使用何种仪器类型。