Ke Yuyong, Dury Alain, Gonthier Renaud, Labrie Fernand
Endoceutics Analytical Laboratory, 1405, Parc Technologique Blvd, Suite 250, Quebec City, QC G1P 4P5, Canada.
Clin Mass Spectrom. 2018 Aug 10;10:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinms.2018.08.003. eCollection 2018 Dec.
In this study, a one-step method for liquid-liquid extraction has been compared against a two-step procedure for testosterone assays in terms of accuracy, specificity, recovery, lipid removal and baseline noise, using QCs and unknown samples. The difference in accuracy was less than 5% for adult sera, while it was less than 10% for prepubescent sera. To compare specificity, the ion ratio transition of 289 → 97 to 289 → 109 was monitored for all QCs and unknown samples; no interference in the testosterone peak was observed for any tested sample prepared by either the one-step or two-step procedure. The baseline comparison of LC-MS/MS chromatograms of samples indicated that samples prepared by the one-step procedure were of the same quality as those prepared by the two-step procedure; however, recovery in unaltered serum using the one-step procedure was approximately 15% greater across the low to high concentration range. Furthermore, recovery using the one-step procedure was more consistent between stripped and unstripped serum. Lipids were removed efficiently in the two-step procedure as verified by monitoring the typical phospholipid MRM transition of m/z 496 → 184. For every sample processed by the one-step procedure, a one-minute online column wash with 95% methanol was able to remove 95% of the bound lipids, thereby providing a column life-time approximately equivalent to that for the two-step procedure. The presented data indicate that the one-step procedure could replace the two-step procedure while maintaining accuracy, saving time, increasing recovery, and minimizing the potential for errors with the fewer steps required.
在本研究中,使用质量控制样品(QCs)和未知样品,就准确性、特异性、回收率、脂质去除和基线噪声而言,对用于睾酮测定的液 - 液萃取一步法与两步法进行了比较。对于成人血清,准确性差异小于5%,而对于青春期前血清,差异小于10%。为比较特异性,监测了所有质量控制样品和未知样品从289→97到289→109的离子比率转变;通过一步法或两步法制备的任何测试样品在睾酮峰处均未观察到干扰。样品的液相色谱 - 串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)色谱图的基线比较表明,一步法制备的样品与两步法制备的样品质量相同;然而,在低至高浓度范围内,一步法在未改变的血清中的回收率高出约15%。此外,一步法在脱脂血清和未脱脂血清之间的回收率更一致。通过监测m/z 496→184的典型磷脂多反应监测(MRM)转变证实,两步法能有效去除脂质。对于通过一步法处理的每个样品,用95%甲醇进行一分钟的在线柱冲洗能够去除95%的结合脂质,从而提供与两步法大致相当的柱寿命。所呈现的数据表明,一步法可以替代两步法,同时保持准确性、节省时间、提高回收率,并通过所需步骤较少来最大限度地减少出错可能性。