Adusumilli Gautam, Faizy Tobias D, Christensen Soren, Mlynash Michael, Loh Yince, Albers Gregory W, Lansberg Maarten G, Fiehler Jens, Heit Jeremy J
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Neuroradiology, University of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 28:15910199241276905. doi: 10.1177/15910199241276905.
Deep venous outflow (VO) may be an important surrogate marker of collateral blood flow in acute ischemic stroke patients with a large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Researchers have yet to determine the relationship between deep VO status in late-window patients and imaging measures of collaterals, which are key in preserving tissue.
We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study on a subset of DEFUSE 3 patients recruited across 38 centers between May 2016 and May 2017 who underwent successful thrombectomy revascularization. Internal cerebral vein opacification was scored on a scale of 0-2. This metric was added to the cortical vein opacification score to derive the comprehensive VO (CVO) score from 0 to 8. Patients were stratified by favorable (ICV+) and unfavorable (ICV-) ICV scores, and similarly CVO+ and CVO-. Analyses comparing outcomes were primarily conducted by Mann-Whitney and χ tests.
Forty-five patients from DEFUSE 3 were scored and dichotomized into CVO+, CVO-, ICV+, and ICV- categories, with comparable demographics. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio, a marker of tissue level collaterals, was significantly worse in the ICV- and CVO- groups (p = 0.005). ICV- alone was also associated with a larger perfusion lesion (138 ml vs 87 ml; p = 0.023). No significant differences were noted in functional and safety outcomes.
Impaired deep venous drainage alone may be a marker of poor tissue level collaterals and a greater degree of affected tissue in AIS-LVO patients presenting in the late-window who subsequently undergo successful revascularization.
在急性缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞(AIS-LVO)患者中,深部静脉流出(VO)可能是侧支血流的重要替代标志物。研究人员尚未确定晚期窗口期患者深部VO状态与侧支循环成像指标之间的关系,而侧支循环成像指标对于组织保护至关重要。
我们对2016年5月至2017年5月期间在38个中心招募的DEFUSE 3患者的一个子集进行了多中心回顾性队列研究,这些患者均接受了成功的血栓切除术血管重建。大脑内静脉显影按0-2级评分。该指标与皮质静脉显影评分相加,得出综合VO(CVO)评分,范围为0至8。患者按有利(ICV+)和不利(ICV-)的ICV评分进行分层,CVO评分同理分为CVO+和CVO-。比较结局的分析主要通过Mann-Whitney检验和χ检验进行。
对DEFUSE 3研究中的45例患者进行评分,并分为CVO+、CVO-、ICV+和ICV-组,各组人口统计学特征具有可比性。组织水平侧支循环的标志物——低灌注强度比值,在ICV-组和CVO-组中显著更差(p = 0.005)。仅ICV-也与更大的灌注缺损相关(138 ml对87 ml;p = 0.023)。功能和安全性结局方面未观察到显著差异。
在晚期窗口期出现、随后接受成功血管重建的AIS-LVO患者中,单纯深部静脉引流受损可能是组织水平侧支循环不良和受影响组织程度更高的一个标志物。