Alharthi Rasha, Mutahar Mahdi, Bartlett David, Jafari Jafar, Moazzez Rebecca
Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
School of Dentistry, Health and Care Professions, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2QG, UK.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;12(8):235. doi: 10.3390/dj12080235.
The aim of this in vivo study was to compare total protein present in the salivary films (F) and acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) on eroded and non-eroded surfaces in patients suffering from GORD symptoms with and without GORD diagnosis (GORD, No-GORD). Thirty-nine patients suffering from GORD symptoms and erosive tooth wear on lower first molars and an unaffected posterior occlusal surface in the same quadrant were recruited from Guy's hospital, London. Salivary film and AEP were collected from the eroded and uneroded occlusal surfaces, using 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)-soaked filter papers. Total protein concentration was analysed using bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA). Statistical analysis was conducted using Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, and Tukey's tests ( < 0.05), comparing four GDS sample types and GORD vs. No-GORD groups. The level of significance was set as < 0.05. Data were compared between eroded and uneroded surfaces in the same patient with GORD symptoms, as well as between those with or without a GORD diagnosis (GORD, No-GORD). The AEP total protein concentration from the eroded [2.17 (0.49) mg/mL] and uneroded surfaces [2.24 (0.66) mg/mL] of the GORD group were statistically significantly lower than those on eroded [3.27 (1.01) mg/mL] and uneroded [3.33 (1.57) mg/mL] surfaces in the No-GORD group ( = 0.007) ( = 0.008), respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed for film and AEP between eroded and uneroded surfaces ( > 0.05).
这项体内研究的目的是比较患有胃食管反流病(GORD)症状且有或无GORD诊断(GORD组、非GORD组)的患者中,侵蚀表面和未侵蚀表面上唾液膜(F)和获得性釉质 pellicle(AEP)中的总蛋白含量。从伦敦盖伊医院招募了39名患有GORD症状且下第一磨牙有侵蚀性牙齿磨损以及同一象限中未受影响的后牙咬合面的患者。使用0.5%十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)浸泡的滤纸从侵蚀和未侵蚀的咬合面收集唾液膜和AEP。使用二辛可宁酸测定法(BCA)分析总蛋白浓度。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验、方差分析和Tukey检验(<0.05)进行统计分析,比较四种GDS样本类型以及GORD组与非GORD组。显著性水平设定为<0.05。对患有GORD症状的同一患者的侵蚀表面和未侵蚀表面之间的数据进行比较,以及对有或无GORD诊断(GORD组、非GORD组)的患者之间的数据进行比较。GORD组侵蚀表面[2.17(0.49)mg/mL]和未侵蚀表面[2.24(0.66)mg/mL]的AEP总蛋白浓度在统计学上显著低于非GORD组侵蚀表面[3.27(1.01)mg/mL]和未侵蚀表面[3.33(1.57)mg/mL]的AEP总蛋白浓度(分别为=0.007)(=0.008)。侵蚀表面和未侵蚀表面之间的唾液膜和AEP未观察到统计学上的显著差异(>0.05)。