Wink Cherie, Yang Susan Meishan, Habib Ali A, Lin Kairong, Takesh Thair, Wilder-Smith Petra
Beckman Laser Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92612, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;12(8):253. doi: 10.3390/dj12080253.
(1) Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), discomfort, fatigue, pain, and other acute and chronic work-related injuries are common among dental clinicians. Hand instruments constitute a primary risk factor for these conditions. The overall goal of this study was to compare in dental hygienists with healthy hands, and in those with MSDs, the effect of three different handle designs on instrumentation-related muscle work, comfort, fatigue, and quality of tactile feedback. (2) Methods: Clinicians tested three periodontal curettes: one with a novel adaptive silicone handle, another with a rigid resin handle, and the third with a rigid silicone handle. Ten hygienists-five with MSDs and five without-each scaled three typodonts using the three different curettes. Statistical analysis was performed using a General Linear Model (GLIM) and Tukey's post hoc test, and a significance level of < 0.05 was implemented. (3) Results: On average, mean comfort and fatigue across all instruments were significantly worse in testers with MSDs, who also expended significantly more work to complete the same task. In all testers, a novel adaptive handle design was associated with significantly reduced total muscle work and post-instrumentation fatigue, as well as better comfort than conventional rigid handle designs. (4) Conclusions: An adaptive curette handle design demonstrated significantly better ergonomic outcomes than conventional rigid curette handle designs. Hygienists with MSDs expend significantly more muscle work during dental instrumentation.
(1) 背景:肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)、不适、疲劳、疼痛以及其他与工作相关的急慢性损伤在牙科临床医生中很常见。手持器械是导致这些情况的主要风险因素。本研究的总体目标是比较手部健康的牙科保健员和患有肌肉骨骼疾病的保健员使用三种不同手柄设计对手动器械操作相关的肌肉工作、舒适度、疲劳程度和触觉反馈质量的影响。(2) 方法:临床医生测试了三种牙周刮治器:一种带有新型自适应硅胶手柄,另一种带有刚性树脂手柄,第三种带有刚性硅胶手柄。10名保健员——5名患有肌肉骨骼疾病,5名没有——每人使用这三种不同的刮治器对三个牙模型进行操作。使用广义线性模型(GLIM)和Tukey事后检验进行统计分析,显著性水平设定为<0.05。(3) 结果:平均而言,患有肌肉骨骼疾病的测试者在使用所有器械时的舒适度和疲劳程度明显更差,他们完成相同任务时消耗的工作量也显著更多。在所有测试者中,新型自适应手柄设计与总肌肉工作量和器械操作后的疲劳程度显著降低相关,并且比传统刚性手柄设计的舒适度更高。(4) 结论:自适应刮治器手柄设计在人体工程学方面的效果明显优于传统刚性刮治器手柄设计。患有肌肉骨骼疾病的保健员在牙科器械操作过程中消耗的肌肉工作量显著更多。