Jungwirth Johannes, Bavato Francesco, Quednow Boris B
AG Neurophänomenologie des Bewusstseins, Erwachsenenpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
AG Experimentelle Pharmakopsychologie und psychologische Suchtforschung, Erwachsenenpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
Nervenarzt. 2024 Sep;95(9):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01727-0. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
With the discovery of the antidepressive effects of ketamine and the increasing withdrawal of the pharmaceutical industry from the development of new psychotropic drugs, the psychiatric research into the clinical application of hallucinogens in psychiatry has literally blossomed in the last two decades. Promising results for various treatment approaches with psychedelic agents, such lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin, and dissociative agents, such as ketamine and esketamine, have raised great hopes among researchers, clinicians and patients in recent years, so that there was already talk of a new era in psychiatry. As one of the first of these substances, in December 2019 intranasal esketamine was approved in the USA and the EU for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and Switzerland followed in 2020. Recently, psilocybin was approved in Australia, Canada and Switzerland for compassionate use in exceptional cases for the treatment of depression, while large approval studies with various psychedelic agents are currently ongoing worldwide. The medical application of psychedelic agents and ketamine/esketamine is considered to be safe; however, as with all new forms of treatment it is of crucial importance that, in addition to the hopes, the specific challenges of these new treatment approaches must also be carefully considered and assessed. Excessive expectations and an insufficient risk-benefit estimation are detrimental to the patients and the reputation of the treating physician. Although a possible paradigm shift in the care of mental health is already being discussed, this review article consciously concentrates on the possible risks of treatment and the methodological weaknesses of the studies carried out so far.
随着氯胺酮抗抑郁作用的发现以及制药行业逐渐减少对新型精神药物的研发投入,在过去二十年里,精神病学领域对致幻剂临床应用的研究蓬勃发展。近年来,诸如麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)和裸盖菇素等迷幻剂以及氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮等解离剂的各种治疗方法取得了令人鼓舞的成果,这让研究人员、临床医生和患者都燃起了极大的希望,以至于有人已经在谈论精神病学的新时代。作为这些物质中的首批药物之一,2019年12月,鼻内用艾氯胺酮在美国和欧盟被批准用于治疗难治性抑郁症,瑞士于2020年也批准了该药物。最近,裸盖菇素在澳大利亚、加拿大和瑞士被批准在特殊情况下用于治疗抑郁症的同情用药,而目前全球正在进行各种迷幻剂的大型批准研究。迷幻剂和氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮的医学应用被认为是安全的;然而,与所有新的治疗形式一样,至关重要的是,除了希望之外,还必须仔细考虑和评估这些新治疗方法所面临的具体挑战。过高的期望和对风险效益的估计不足对患者和治疗医生的声誉都是有害 的。尽管已经在讨论心理健康护理方面可能发生的范式转变,但这篇综述文章有意识地专注于治疗的潜在风险以及迄今为止所开展研究的方法学弱点。