Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429654. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29654.
The widespread use of antihistamines in children for treatment of common cold symptoms and their central nervous system effects, like drowsiness, underscore the importance of being aware of the associated risks.
To assess associations between prescriptions of first-generation antihistamines and seizures in children using a comprehensive and nationwide dataset.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a self-controlled case-crossover design. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service database in Korea. Children born between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2005, who visited the emergency department for seizure events (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, codes R56.8, G40, and G41) during the follow-up period were included. Follow-up was completed on December 31, 2019, and data were analyzed from June 3, 2023, to January 30, 2024.
First-generation antihistamine prescription.
Primary outcome consisted of an index seizure event. Odds ratios (ORs) for seizure events were estimated using a conditional logistic regression model, comparing first-generation antihistamine prescription 1 to 15 days before seizure (hazard period) against control period 1 (31-45 days before the event) and control period 2 (61-75 days before the event) using the same period windows. Stratified analyses were conducted to examine the association with individual participant characteristics.
Of 11 729 children who had a seizure event, 3178 (1776 [55.9%] boys) were identified as having been prescribed antihistamines during the hazard or the control period, but not both. Seizure events were predominantly observed in children aged 6 to 24 months (985 [31.0%]) and 25 months to 6 years (1445 [45.5%]). During the hazard period, 1476 first-generation antihistamine prescriptions were recorded, in contrast to 1239 and 1278 prescriptions during control periods 1 and 2, respectively. After multiple confounder adjustments, first-generation antihistamine prescription was associated with an increased seizure event risk during the hazard period (adjusted OR [AOR], 1.22 [95% CI, 1.13-1.31]). Stratified subgroup analyses showed consistent results, particularly in children aged 6 to 24 months who were prescribed first-generation antihistamines having a higher risk (AOR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.31-1.70]) than children aged 25 months to 6 years (AOR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.00-1.24]; P = .04 for interaction). Furthermore, sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for exposure window periods, evaluation of new first-generation antihistamine prescriptions, comparison of control points from the same period 1 year prior, and exclusion of individuals using combination drugs, confirmed a similarly high risk.
In this cohort study, prescriptions for first-generation antihistamines were associated with a 22.0% higher seizure risk in children, especially in those aged 6 to 24 months. These findings emphasize the need for careful and judicious prescription of first-generation antihistamines in young children and underline the need for further research to elucidate associations between antihistamine prescriptions and seizure risk.
抗组胺药在儿童中被广泛用于治疗普通感冒症状及其对中枢神经系统的影响,如嗜睡,这突显了了解相关风险的重要性。
使用全面和全国性的数据集评估第一代抗组胺药与儿童癫痫发作之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了自我对照病例交叉设计。数据来自韩国国家健康保险服务数据库。纳入在随访期间因癫痫发作事件(国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类,第十版,代码 R56.8、G40 和 G41)到急诊就诊的 2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2005 年 12 月 31 日出生的儿童。随访于 2019 年 12 月 31 日结束,数据分析于 2023 年 6 月 3 日至 2024 年 1 月 30 日进行。
第一代抗组胺药处方。
主要结局包括指数性癫痫发作事件。使用条件逻辑回归模型估计癫痫发作事件的比值比(ORs),与危险期(发作前 1 至 15 天)相比,将第一代抗组胺药处方 1 与对照期 1(事件前 31 至 45 天)和对照期 2(事件前 61 至 75 天)进行比较,使用相同的时期窗口。进行分层分析以检查与个体参与者特征的关联。
在 11729 名发生癫痫发作的儿童中,有 3178 名(1776 名男孩[55.9%])在危险期或对照期接受了抗组胺药处方,但并非同时接受两种处方。癫痫发作主要发生在 6 至 24 个月龄(985 名[31.0%])和 25 个月至 6 岁(1445 名[45.5%])的儿童中。在危险期记录了 1476 份第一代抗组胺药处方,而对照期 1 和 2 分别记录了 1239 份和 1278 份处方。经过多次混杂因素调整后,第一代抗组胺药处方与危险期癫痫发作风险增加相关(调整比值比[AOR],1.22[95%CI,1.13-1.31])。分层亚组分析显示出一致的结果,特别是在接受第一代抗组胺药治疗的 6 至 24 个月龄儿童中,风险更高(AOR,1.49[95%CI,1.31-1.70]),而 25 个月至 6 岁的儿童(AOR,1.11[95%CI,1.00-1.24];P=0.04 用于交互)。此外,包括调整暴露窗口期、评估新的第一代抗组胺药处方、比较同期前 1 年的对照点以及排除使用联合药物的个体在内的敏感性分析也证实了类似的高风险。
在这项队列研究中,儿童第一代抗组胺药处方与癫痫发作风险增加 22.0%相关,特别是在 6 至 24 个月龄的儿童中。这些发现强调了在幼儿中谨慎和明智地开具第一代抗组胺药处方的必要性,并强调了进一步研究阐明抗组胺药处方与癫痫发作风险之间关联的必要性。