Suppr超能文献

在失语症的认知和语言处理过程中保持警惕的注意力。

Vigilant Attention During Cognitive and Language Processing in Aphasia.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 12;67(9):3133-3147. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00168. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Persons with aphasia (PWA) experience differences in attention after stroke, potentially impacting cognitive/language performance. This secondary analysis investigated physiologically measured vigilant attention during linguistic and nonlinguistic processing in PWA and control participants.

METHOD

To evaluate performance and attention in a language task, seven PWA read sentences aloud (linguistic task) and were compared to a previous data set of 10 controls and 10 PWA. To evaluate performance and attention in a language-independent task, 11 controls and nine PWA completed the Bivalent Shape Task (nonlinguistic task). Continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) data were collected during each session. A previously validated EEG algorithm classified vigilant-attention state for each experiment trial into high, moderate, distracted, or no attention. Dependent measures were task accuracy and amount of time spent in each attention state (measured by the number of trials).

RESULTS

PWA produced significantly more errors than controls on the linguistic task, but groups performed similarly on the nonlinguistic task. During the linguistic task, controls spent significantly more time than PWA in a moderate-attention state, but no statistically significant differences were found between groups for other attention states. For the nonlinguistic task, amount of time controls and PWA spent in each attention state was more evenly distributed. When directly comparing attention patterns between linguistic and nonlinguistic tasks, PWA showed significantly more time in a high-attention state during the linguistic task as compared to the nonlinguistic task; however, controls showed no significant differences between linguistic and nonlinguistic tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new evidence that PWA experience a heightened state of vigilant attention when language processing demands are higher (during a linguistic task) than when language demands are lower (during a nonlinguistic task). Collectively, results of this study suggest that when processing language, PWA may allocate more attentional resources than when completing other kinds of cognitive tasks.

摘要

目的

失语症患者(PWA)在中风后注意力存在差异,这可能会影响认知/语言表现。本研究对 PWA 和对照组参与者在语言和非语言处理过程中的生理测量警觉注意力进行了二次分析。

方法

为了评估语言任务中的表现和注意力,7 名 PWA 大声朗读句子(语言任务),并与之前的一组 10 名对照组和 10 名 PWA 的数据进行比较。为了评估独立于语言的任务中的表现和注意力,11 名对照组和 9 名 PWA 完成了双价形状任务(非语言任务)。在每次实验中都采集连续脑电图(EEG)数据。一个经过验证的 EEG 算法将警觉注意力状态的每个实验试验分类为高、中、分散或无注意力。因变量为任务准确性和每个注意力状态下花费的时间(通过试验次数衡量)。

结果

PWA 在语言任务上的错误明显多于对照组,但两组在非语言任务上的表现相似。在语言任务中,对照组在中度注意状态下花费的时间明显多于 PWA,但两组在其他注意状态下没有统计学上的显著差异。对于非语言任务,对照组和 PWA 在每个注意力状态下花费的时间分布更加均匀。当直接比较语言和非语言任务之间的注意力模式时,与非语言任务相比,PWA 在语言任务中处于高度注意状态的时间明显更长;然而,对照组在语言和非语言任务之间没有表现出显著差异。

结论

这项研究提供了新的证据,表明当语言处理要求更高(在语言任务中)时,PWA 会处于更高的警觉注意力状态,而当语言要求较低(在非语言任务中)时,他们会处于较低的警觉注意力状态。总的来说,这项研究的结果表明,当处理语言时,PWA 可能会比完成其他类型的认知任务分配更多的注意力资源。

相似文献

1
Vigilant Attention During Cognitive and Language Processing in Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 12;67(9):3133-3147. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00168. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Decision Making by People With Aphasia: A Comparison of Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Measures.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1845-1860. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00182. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
Between-session and within-session intra-individual variability in attention in aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 31;109:95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Relationship Between Cognitive Functions and Multilevel Language Processing: Data From Chinese Speakers With Aphasia and Implications.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Mar 8;65(3):1128-1144. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00381. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
Between-session intra-individual variability in sustained, selective, and integrational non-linguistic attention in aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.026. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
6
An Examination of Strategy Implementation During Abstract Nonlinguistic Category Learning in Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Aug 1;58(4):1195-209. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0257.
7
The Production of Gesture and Speech by People With Aphasia: Influence of Communicative Constraints.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 11;62(12):4417-4432. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0020. Print 2019 Dec 18.
8
Communication strategies to support decision-making by persons with aphasia: A scoping review.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):1955-1976. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12925. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
9
Effects of mindfulness meditation on three individuals with aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 Nov-Dec;47(6):673-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00173.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
10
The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4900-4917. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00129. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of physiological changes associated with single-session pre-frontal tDCS: a pilot study.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Feb 25;19:1549248. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1549248. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients experience of cognitive fatigue post-stroke: an exploratory study.
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(19):4514-4521. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2280065. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
2
Physiological Arousal, Attentiveness, Emotion, and Word Retrieval in Aphasia: Effects and Relationships.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2554-2564. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00305. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
3
Relationship Between Physiologically Measured Attention and Behavioral Task Engagement in Persons With Chronic Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1430-1445. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00016. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
4
Sleepiness, Exertion Fatigue, Arousal, and Vigilant Attention in Persons With Chronic Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1491-1508. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0301. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
Clinical Outcomes Following Language-Specific Attention Treatment Versus Direct Attention Training for Aphasia: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Aug 15;62(8):2785-2811. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0504. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Between-session and within-session intra-individual variability in attention in aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 31;109:95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Sustained Attention in Real Classroom Settings: An EEG Study.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jul 31;11:388. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00388. eCollection 2017.
8
Language-Specific Attention Treatment for Aphasia: Description and Preliminary Findings.
Semin Speech Lang. 2017 Feb;38(1):5-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597260. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
10
The roles of cortical oscillations in sustained attention.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;19(4):188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验