Rembrandt Hannah N, Riley Ellyn A
Aphasia Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Feb 25;19:1549248. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1549248. eCollection 2025.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive, painless method of applying direct current electrical stimulation to specific areas of the brain, is an effective method for enhancing attention and post-stroke fatigue, as shown by behavioral improvements in post-stroke populations. While behavioral evidence supports this method, there is a paucity of physiological data corroboration of this improvement. The current study is designed to investigate if a single session of tDCS will improve attention and fatigue as shown by relevant physiological methods in persons with post-stroke aphasia.
Ten participants (5 male; mean age: 62.8) engaged in two identically structured data collection sessions with at least a 3-day wash-out period between them. Sessions started with a sustained attention task with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and pupillometry data collection, followed by an attention training program with simultaneous active or sham tDCS. Following tDCS, participants repeated the sustained attention task with simultaneous EEG and pupillometry data collection. Participants received active tDCS during one session, and sham tDCS during the other, with the order randomized.
No differences between conditions were found for either behavioral results from the sustained attention task (i.e., reaction time of correct responses; = 9 = 0.39) or EEG measured attention state data for any of the four attention states: no attention ( = 10, = 0.83), distracted attention ( = 10, = 0.20), moderate attention ( = 10, = 0.95), or high attention ( = 10, = 0.62). Pupil dilation was significantly greater in the post-active tDCS stimulation condition than in either pre-training condition ( = 10, < 0.01). tDCS stimulation lessened the increase in task-based fatigue from the beginning to the end of the session such that there was a significant increase in task-based fatigue when participants received sham tDCS ( = 10, = 0.01) but no significant change in task-based fatigue during the active condition session ( = 10, = 0.12).
Changes in pupil diameter observed in the active stimulation condition suggest activation of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) pathway within a single session of tDCS administration, but the lack of significant changes for either response time or attention states indicate no direct effect on behaviorally measured or EEG measured attention within the same timeframe. Responses to active stimulation in terms of subjective fatigue rating varied between individual participants; overall, active tDCS mitigated task-based fatigue. More research is needed to investigate this relationship.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种将直流电刺激无创、无痛地施加于大脑特定区域的方法,如中风后人群的行为改善所示,它是增强注意力和缓解中风后疲劳的有效方法。虽然行为证据支持这种方法,但缺乏生理数据对这种改善的佐证。本研究旨在调查单次tDCS是否会如中风后失语症患者相关生理方法所示改善注意力和疲劳。
10名参与者(5名男性;平均年龄:62.8岁)进行了两次结构相同的数据收集环节,两次环节之间至少有3天的洗脱期。环节开始时进行持续注意力任务,同时收集脑电图(EEG)和瞳孔测量数据,随后进行注意力训练项目,同时施加主动或伪tDCS。tDCS后,参与者重复持续注意力任务,同时收集EEG和瞳孔测量数据。参与者在一次环节中接受主动tDCS,在另一次环节中接受伪tDCS,顺序随机。
持续注意力任务的行为结果(即正确反应的反应时间;=9 =0.39)或四种注意力状态(无注意力(=10,=0.83)、分散注意力(=10,=0.20)、适度注意力(=10,=0.95)或高度注意力(=10,=0.62))中任何一种的EEG测量注意力状态数据在不同条件之间均未发现差异。主动tDCS刺激后条件下的瞳孔扩张明显大于训练前的任何一种条件(=10,<0.01)。tDCS刺激减轻了从环节开始到结束基于任务的疲劳增加,以至于当参与者接受伪tDCS时基于任务的疲劳有显著增加(=10,=0.01),但在主动条件环节中基于任务的疲劳没有显著变化(=10,=0.12)。
在主动刺激条件下观察到的瞳孔直径变化表明在单次tDCS给药过程中蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素(LC-NE)通路被激活,但反应时间或注意力状态均无显著变化表明在同一时间范围内对行为测量或EEG测量的注意力没有直接影响。个体参与者对主动刺激的主观疲劳评分反应各不相同;总体而言,主动tDCS减轻了基于任务的疲劳。需要更多研究来调查这种关系。