Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Medical Psychology, Health and Medical University Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Hardtwaldklinik I Werner Wicker GmbH & Co. KG, Hospital for Neurology - Psychiatry/Psychotherapy With Psychosomatic and Trauma Therapy, Bad Zwesten, Germany.
J Psychosom Res. 2024 Nov;186:111902. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111902. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to long-term health issues known as post-COVID-19 condition, including fatigue and cognitive disruptions. Despite its recognition as a public health concern, the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, especially in neurological rehabilitation, remains unclear. This study examines how treatment expectations are associated with psychological and physical outcomes in post-COVID-19 condition neurological rehabilitation.
In an observational cohort study 61 patients with confirmed post-COVID-19 condition were included. Baseline (T0) data on treatment and side effect expectations were collected, before participants underwent a 4-6 week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Primary outcome was illness-related disability (Pain Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety levels (GAD-7), functional status (PCFS), fatigue (CFS), and physical fitness (6MWT). Regression models analyzed the associations of baseline expectations with outcomes at the end of rehabilitation (T1) and three months post-rehabilitation (T2).
After adjusting for multiple testing, higher baseline side-effect expectations were associated with greater illness-related disability (β = 0.42, p = 0.007), reduced physical fitness (β = - 0.24, p = 0.04), and more somatic symptoms (β = 0.33, p = 0.006) at follow-up (T2). Positive treatment expectations were associated with poorer functional status (β = 0.35, p = 0.011) at T2.
This study highlights the associations of side-effect expectations with post-COVID-19 condition rehabilitation outcomes. Higher side-effect expectations were associated to poorer outcomes, indicating a nocebo effect. Surprisingly, positive expectations were linked to worse outcomes, possibly due to unrealistic optimism. Managing patient expectations realistically and addressing side-effect concerns seems crucial for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes.
由 SARS-CoV-2 引起的 COVID-19 大流行导致了被称为 COVID-19 后状况的长期健康问题,包括疲劳和认知障碍。尽管它被认为是一个公共卫生问题,但治疗干预的疗效,特别是在神经康复方面,仍不清楚。本研究探讨了治疗期望如何与 COVID-19 后状况神经康复中的心理和身体结果相关。
在一项观察性队列研究中,纳入了 61 名确诊的 COVID-19 后状况患者。在参与者接受 4-6 周的多学科康复计划之前,收集了基线(T0)的治疗和副作用期望数据。主要结果是与疾病相关的残疾(疼痛残疾指数)。次要结果包括抑郁症状(PHQ-9)、焦虑水平(GAD-7)、功能状态(PCFS)、疲劳(CFS)和身体状况(6MWT)。回归模型分析了基线期望与康复结束时(T1)和康复后三个月(T2)的结果之间的关联。
在进行多次检验调整后,较高的基线副作用期望与更大的疾病相关残疾(β=0.42,p=0.007)、较低的身体状况(β=-0.24,p=0.04)和更多的躯体症状(β=0.33,p=0.006)相关。积极的治疗期望与 T2 时较差的功能状态(β=0.35,p=0.011)相关。
本研究强调了副作用期望与 COVID-19 后状况康复结果的关联。较高的副作用期望与较差的结果相关,表明存在反安慰剂效应。令人惊讶的是,积极的期望与更差的结果相关,这可能是由于不切实际的乐观主义。现实地管理患者的期望并解决副作用问题似乎对于优化康复结果至关重要。