Evaluation of five methods for the interpolation of bad leads in the solution of the inverse electrocardiography problem.

This study aims to assess the sensitivity of epicardial potential-based electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to the removal or interpolation of bad leads.We utilized experimental data from two distinct centers. Langendorff-perfused pig (= 2) and dog (= 2) hearts were suspended in a human torso-shaped tank and paced from the ventricles. Six different bad lead configurations were designed based on clinical experience. Five interpolation methods were applied to estimate the missing data. Zero-order Tikhonov regularization was used to solve the inverse problem for complete data, data with removed bad leads, and interpolated data. We assessed the quality of interpolated ECG signals and ECGI reconstructions using several metrics, comparing the performance of interpolation methods and the impact of bad lead removal versus interpolation on ECGI.The performance of ECG interpolation strongly correlated with ECGI reconstruction. The hybrid method exhibited the best performance among interpolation techniques, followed closely by the inverse-forward and Kriging methods. Bad leads located over high amplitude/high gradient areas on the torso significantly impacted ECGI reconstructions, even with minor interpolation errors. The choice between removing or interpolating bad leads depends on the location of missing leads and confidence in interpolation performance. If uncertainty exists, removing bad leads is the safer option, particularly when they are positioned in high amplitude/high gradient regions. In instances where interpolation is necessary, the inverse-forward and Kriging methods, which do not require training, are recommended.This study represents the first comprehensive evaluation of the advantages and drawbacks of interpolating versus removing bad leads in the context of ECGI, providing valuable insights into ECGI performance.