Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre (TCBC), Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry/Special Needs Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU).
Dent Mater J. 2024 Sep 28;43(5):738-745. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2024-067. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture behavior of endodontically treated (ET) deciduous molar when directly restored with different restorative materials in Class II (MO) cavities in comparison with permanent teeth. MO cavities were prepared with 2.4-2.5 mm and 1.9-2.0 mm in buccolingual width, and mesiodistal width of each cavity walls, respectively, followed by direct restoration with different materials: resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), composite resin (CR), and composite resin containing 25% short glass-fiber (SFRC). All specimens were subjected to mechanical loading tests at a speed of 1 mm/min and evaluated fracture resistance and fracture modes. A one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey multiple comparisons analysis was used. Deciduous-SFRC (3,310.5±396.2 N) were significantly higher fracture resistance than permanent-RMGIC (1,633.8±346.8 N) (p<0.001), and permanent-CR (1,400.0±381.3 N) (p<0.001). For the direct restoration of MO cavity after endodontic treatment, SFRC demonstrated its promising performance in load-bearing capacity and failure mode, especially in ET deciduous molars.
本研究旨在比较不同修复材料直接修复 II 类(MO)窝洞的牙髓治疗(ET)乳磨牙的骨折行为与恒牙。MO 窝洞分别用 2.4-2.5mm 和 1.9-2.0mm 的颊舌宽度以及每个窝洞壁的近远中宽度制备,然后用不同材料直接修复:树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)、复合树脂(CR)和含 25%短玻璃纤维的复合树脂(SFRC)。所有标本均以 1mm/min 的速度进行机械加载试验,并评估抗断裂能力和断裂模式。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA),然后进行 Tukey 多重比较分析。乳牙-SFRC(3310.5±396.2N)的抗断裂能力明显高于恒牙-RMGIC(1633.8±346.8N)(p<0.001)和恒牙-CR(1400.0±381.3N)(p<0.001)。对于牙髓治疗后 MO 窝洞的直接修复,SFRC 在承载能力和失效模式方面表现出了良好的性能,特别是在 ET 乳磨牙中。