• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在眼动指标上的差异:考察静息瞳孔大小、抑制控制与固视稳定性之间的关系。

Individual differences in baseline eye movement indices: Examining the relationships between baseline pupil size, inhibitory control, and fixation stability.

机构信息

School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, 1 Keji Rd., Minhou District, Fuzhou, 350117, Fujian, China.

Nanxing Middle School, 18 Binxi Rd., Shuitou Town, Nan'an City, Quanzhou, 362342, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec;24(6):1084-1095. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01213-9. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-024-01213-9
PMID:39198300
Abstract

The relationship among baseline pupil size, fixation stability, and inhibitory control were examined in this study. Participants performed a baseline eye measure in which they were instructed to stare at a fixation dot on screen for 2 min. Following the baseline eye measure, participants completed an antisaccade task to measure inhibitory control ability. We found a correlation between baseline pupil size variability and inhibitory control, as well as between fixation stability and inhibitory control. We showed that participants with better inhibitory control exhibited larger variability in pupil size, and those with better fixation stability showed superior inhibitory control ability. Overall, our results indicate that there are significant correlations between inhibitory control and baseline pupil size, as well as between inhibitory control and fixation stability.

摘要

本研究考察了基线瞳孔大小、注视稳定性和抑制控制之间的关系。参与者进行了基线眼动测量,他们被指示在屏幕上的注视点注视 2 分钟。在基线眼动测量之后,参与者完成了反扫视任务以测量抑制控制能力。我们发现基线瞳孔大小变异性与抑制控制之间以及注视稳定性与抑制控制之间存在相关性。我们表明,抑制控制能力更好的参与者表现出更大的瞳孔大小变异性,而注视稳定性更好的参与者表现出更高的抑制控制能力。总体而言,我们的结果表明抑制控制与基线瞳孔大小之间以及抑制控制与注视稳定性之间存在显著相关性。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in baseline eye movement indices: Examining the relationships between baseline pupil size, inhibitory control, and fixation stability.个体在眼动指标上的差异:考察静息瞳孔大小、抑制控制与固视稳定性之间的关系。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec;24(6):1084-1095. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01213-9. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining variation in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability.基线眼动测量的个体差异:研究基线瞳孔直径、自发眨眼率和注视稳定性的变化。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):1074-1093. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00709-z.
3
Pupil size influences the eye-tracker signal during saccades.瞳孔大小在扫视过程中会影响眼动追踪信号。
Vision Res. 2016 Apr;121:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Pupil size dynamics during fixation impact the accuracy and precision of video-based gaze estimation.注视过程中瞳孔大小的动态变化会影响基于视频的注视估计的准确性和精确性。
Vision Res. 2016 Jan;118:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
5
The "subjective" pupil old/new effect: is the truth plain to see?“主观”瞳孔新旧效应:真相显而易见吗?
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Jul;89(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 9.
6
Do pupil-based binocular video eye trackers reliably measure vergence?基于瞳孔的双目视频眼动仪能否可靠地测量双眼视轴辐辏?
Vision Res. 2019 Mar;156:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
7
Measuring the stare-in-the-crowd effect: a new paradigm to study social perception.测量群视效应:一种研究社会感知的新范式。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):994-1003. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0514-7.
8
Pupil Response in Visual Tracking Tasks: The Impacts of Task Load, Familiarity, and Gaze Position.视觉跟踪任务中的瞳孔反应:任务负荷、熟悉程度和注视位置的影响
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;24(8):2545. doi: 10.3390/s24082545.
9
Fixation Duration and Pupil Size as Diagnostic Tools in Parkinson's Disease.固定持续时间和瞳孔大小作为帕金森病的诊断工具
J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(2):865-875. doi: 10.3233/JPD-202427.
10
The relationship between baseline pupil size and intelligence.基线瞳孔大小与智力之间的关系。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Dec;91:109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
An examination of relations between baseline pupil measures and cognitive abilities.考察基线瞳孔测量值与认知能力之间的关系。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Dec;59(12):e14124. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14124. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Fluid intelligence and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.流体智力与蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素系统。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 16;118(46). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110630118.
3
Baseline pupil size is related to fluid intelligence: A reply to.基线瞳孔大小与流体智力有关:对……的回应
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104826. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104826. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Is baseline pupil size related to cognitive ability? Yes (under proper lighting conditions).基础瞳孔大小与认知能力有关吗?有(在适当的照明条件下)。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104643. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104643. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
The effects of cognitive abilities and task demands on tonic and phasic pupil sizes.认知能力和任务需求对瞳孔紧张和瞬间尺寸的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Oct;156:107945. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107945. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Pupil Size as a Window on Neural Substrates of Cognition.瞳孔大小作为认知神经基质的窗口。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jun;24(6):466-480. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
Pupillometry: Psychology, Physiology, and Function.瞳孔测量法:心理学、生理学与功能
J Cogn. 2018 Feb 21;1(1):16. doi: 10.5334/joc.18.
8
Individual differences in resting-state pupil size: Evidence for association between working memory capacity and pupil size variability.静息状态瞳孔大小的个体差异:工作记忆容量与瞳孔大小变异性之间关联的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Jun;140:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
9
On the interrelation of 1/ neural noise and norepinephrine system activity during motor response inhibition.在运动反应抑制过程中 1/ 神经噪声与去甲肾上腺素能系统活动的相互关系。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 May 1;121(5):1633-1643. doi: 10.1152/jn.00701.2018. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Task-evoked pupil dilation and BOLD variance as indicators of locus coeruleus dysfunction.任务诱发的瞳孔扩张和 BOLD 方差作为蓝斑功能障碍的指标。
Cortex. 2017 Dec;97:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.025. Epub 2017 Oct 7.