University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK.
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01057-z.
Paramedics are responsible for critical resuscitation decisions when attending Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). Existing research indicates that a range of clinical and non-clinical factors moderate their decision-making. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there is little evidence on how and why paramedics make their decisions at actual OHCA events.
We explored the experiences of UK paramedics using individually recalled OHCA events as catalysts for discussion. Pen portraits developed from semi-structured interviews with 31 paramedics across two UK ambulance services were thematically analysed, enabling cross-participant comparisons whilst retaining depth and context.
We identified four themes: uncertainties encountered in resuscitation guidelines, influences on decision-making, holistic perspectives, and indirect moderators. We found that paramedics experienced uncertainty at all stages of the resuscitation process. Uncertainties arose from indeterminate, ambiguous or complex information and were described as having both clinical and ethical dimensions. Whilst guidelines drove paramedics' decisions, non-clinical personal, practical and relational factors moderated their assessments of survivability and decision-making, with attitudes to interactions between patient age, frailty and quality of life playing a substantial role. Coping strategies such as uncertainty reduction, assumption-based reasoning and weighing pros and cons were evident from interviews.
The complexity of interactions between clinical and non-clinical factors points to an element of variability in paramedics' responses to uncertainty. Exploring UK paramedics' uncertainties and decision-making during specific OHCA events can help acknowledge and address uncertainties in resuscitation guidelines and paramedic training, providing paramedics with the tools to manage uncertainty in a consistent and transparent way.
当处理院外心脏骤停(OHCA)时,护理人员负责进行关键的复苏决策。现有研究表明,一系列临床和非临床因素会影响他们的决策。在英国,关于护理人员在实际 OHCA 事件中如何以及为何做出决策的证据很少。
我们使用个人回忆的 OHCA 事件作为讨论的催化剂,探讨了英国护理人员的经验。对来自两个英国救护服务机构的 31 名护理人员的半结构化访谈进行了主题分析,从而形成了个人素描,这种分析方法使跨参与者的比较得以实现,同时保留了深度和背景。
我们确定了四个主题:复苏指南中遇到的不确定性、对决策的影响、整体观点和间接调节因素。我们发现,护理人员在复苏过程的所有阶段都经历了不确定性。这些不确定性源于不确定、模棱两可或复杂的信息,并且被描述为具有临床和伦理层面。虽然指南推动了护理人员的决策,但非临床的个人、实际和关系因素调节了他们对生存能力和决策的评估,对患者年龄、脆弱性和生活质量之间相互作用的态度起着重要作用。从访谈中可以明显看出,护理人员采用了不确定性减少、基于假设的推理和权衡利弊等应对策略。
临床和非临床因素之间相互作用的复杂性表明,护理人员对不确定性的反应存在一定程度的可变性。探索英国护理人员在特定 OHCA 事件中的不确定性和决策,可以帮助在复苏指南和护理人员培训中承认和解决不确定性,为护理人员提供以一致和透明的方式管理不确定性的工具。