Loscalzo Yura
Department of Health Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(8):684. doi: 10.3390/bs14080684.
In 2017, Loscalzo and Giannini introduced the new potential clinical condition of studyholism (or obsession toward study) and a comprehensive model including its possible antecedents and outcomes. Then, emphasizing the value of avoiding an aprioristic (addiction) framework in analyzing problematic overstudying, they suggested conducting research on this new construct to unveil its internalizing and/or externalizing nature while also avoiding the over-pathologizing of a common behavior such as studying. Seven years after the first publication about studyholism, growing evidence concerning its antecedents suggested that studyholism might be defined as an OCD-related disorder (or, more generally, as an internalizing disorder). Moreover, the research about its outcomes highlighted that it is a problem behavior deserving attention as it is associated with academic, psychological, physical, and social downsides. Therefore, this paper aims to review the scientific literature published concerning studyholism to illuminate if it might be conceptualized as an OCD-related disorder based on its symptomatology, antecedents, and impact on individuals' academic, physical, and psychological functioning. Given that it is a new construct, it is of critical value to systematize the findings gathered until now as it can help scholars interested in students' well-being to have a clear understanding concerning the importance of screening studyholism since childhood, as this will help favor academic success and well-being and reduce the risk for school dropout. Finally, this paper presents an agenda for future research on studyholism, and it highlights the importance of further analyzing problematic overstudying using different theoretical perspectives (such as the behavioral addiction conceptualization) to unveil its real nature.
2017年,洛斯科尔佐和詹尼尼提出了“学习成瘾”(或对学习的痴迷)这一新的潜在临床状况,并给出了一个全面的模型,包括其可能的前因和后果。然后,他们强调在分析过度学习问题时避免先入为主的(成瘾)框架的重要性,建议对这一新概念进行研究,以揭示其内化和/或外化的本质,同时避免将学习这种常见行为过度病理化。在关于学习成瘾的首次发表七年之后,越来越多关于其前因的证据表明,学习成瘾可能被定义为一种与强迫症相关的障碍(或者更普遍地说,是一种内化障碍)。此外,关于其后果的研究突出表明,它是一种值得关注的问题行为,因为它与学业、心理、身体和社交方面的负面影响相关。因此,本文旨在回顾已发表的关于学习成瘾的科学文献,以阐明基于其症状、前因以及对个体学业、身体和心理功能的影响,它是否可以被概念化为一种与强迫症相关的障碍。鉴于这是一个新的概念,将目前收集到的研究结果系统化具有至关重要的价值,因为这可以帮助关注学生福祉的学者清楚地了解从小筛查学习成瘾的重要性,因为这将有助于促进学业成功和福祉,并降低辍学风险。最后,本文提出了一个关于学习成瘾未来研究的议程,并强调了使用不同理论视角(如行为成瘾概念化)进一步分析过度学习问题以揭示其真实本质的重要性。