• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining the Utility of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Traumatic Brain Injury Screening among Women Veterans: Recommendations for Expansion to Include Interpersonal Violence.审视退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)对女性退伍军人创伤性脑损伤筛查的效用:关于扩大筛查范围以纳入人际暴力的建议
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 14;14(8):814. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080814.
2
Correspondence of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime (BAT-L) clinical interview and the VA TBI screen.《波士顿创伤性脑损伤终身评估(BAT-L)临床访谈与退伍军人事务部创伤性脑损伤筛查的一致性》
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):E1-7. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000008.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime Clinical Interview Compared to Department of Defense Medical Records.波士顿创伤性脑损伤终身临床访谈诊断准确性与国防部医疗记录比较。
Mil Med. 2023 Nov 3;188(11-12):3561-3569. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac162.
4
Stability and Validity of the Veterans Health Administration's Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Reminder Screen.退伍军人健康管理局创伤性脑损伤临床提醒筛查的稳定性和有效性
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):E29-39. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000095.
5
The Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime Semistructured Interview for Assessment of TBI and Subconcussive Injury Among Female Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence of Research Utility and Validity.波士顿创伤性脑损伤终身半结构式访谈用于评估亲密伴侣暴力女性幸存者的创伤性脑损伤和亚临床损伤:研究效用和有效性的证据。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(3):E175-E185. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000700. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
Intimate Partner Violence Among Female OEF/OIF/OND Veterans Who Were Evaluated for Traumatic Brain Injury in the Veterans Health Administration: A Preliminary Investigation.在退伍军人健康管理局接受创伤性脑损伤评估的女性 OEF/OIF/OND 退伍军人中,亲密伴侣暴力:初步调查。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Jul;35(13-14):2422-2445. doi: 10.1177/0886260517702491. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
7
The Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime (BAT-L) semistructured interview: evidence of research utility and validity.波士顿创伤性脑损伤终生评估(BAT-L)半结构式访谈:研究实用性和有效性的证据。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):89-98. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182865859.
8
Headache Prevalence at 4-11 Years After Deployment-Related Traumatic Brain Injury in Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Wars and Comparison to Controls: A Matched Case-Controlled Study.伊拉克和阿富汗战争退役军人创伤性脑损伤后 4-11 年头痛的患病率及与对照组的比较:一项匹配病例对照研究。
Headache. 2016 Jun;56(6):1004-21. doi: 10.1111/head.12837. Epub 2016 May 30.
9
Anticipating the traumatic brain injury-related health care needs of women veterans after the Department of Defense change in combat assignment policy.预测国防部改变作战任务分配政策后,女性退伍军人创伤性脑损伤相关的医疗保健需求。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):e171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.12.004.
10
Screening for Remote History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in VHA: A Critical Literature Review.美国退伍军人事务部中轻度创伤性脑损伤远程病史的筛查:一项批判性文献综述
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):204-14. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000168.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvements in Safety Outcomes Following Brief Healthcare-Based Intimate Partner Violence Interventions among Women Who Screen Positive for Intimate Partner Violence-Related Traumatic Brain Injuries.在筛查出与亲密伴侣暴力相关创伤性脑损伤呈阳性的女性中,基于医疗保健的简短亲密伴侣暴力干预后安全结果的改善。
Brain Sci. 2024 Oct 6;14(10):1008. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14101008.

本文引用的文献

1
Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Are Associated with Physical Health Burden Among Post-9/11 Women Veterans.创伤性脑损伤和创伤后应激障碍与9·11事件后女性退伍军人的身体健康负担相关。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jan;34(2):221-228. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0147. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury: Unmasking and Addressing the Gaps.亲密伴侣暴力相关脑损伤:揭开并解决差距。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Oct;41(19-20):2219-2237. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0543. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
Learning from women veterans who navigate invisible injuries, caregiving, and reintegration challenges.向那些能够应对隐形伤害、护理和再融入挑战的女性退伍军人学习。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02815-0.
4
Exploring the Relationships Between Rehabilitation and Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: A Scoping Review.探索康复与亲密伴侣暴力幸存者之间的关系:一项范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Apr;25(2):1638-1660. doi: 10.1177/15248380231196807. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
5
Exploring the intersection of brain injury and mental health in survivors of intimate partner violence: A scoping review.探讨亲密伴侣暴力幸存者中脑损伤与心理健康的交集:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;11:1100549. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1100549. eCollection 2023.
6
Intimate partner violence, substance use, and health comorbidities among women: A narrative review.女性亲密伴侣暴力、物质使用与健康共病:一项叙述性综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 27;13:1028375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028375. eCollection 2022.
7
Characterizing Sex Differences in Clinical and Functional Outcomes Among Military Veterans with a Comprehensive Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation (CTBIE): A Million Veteran Program (MVP) Study.通过综合创伤性脑损伤评估(CTBIE)对退伍军人临床和功能结局中的性别差异进行特征分析:百万退伍军人计划(MVP)研究。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov 21;2022. doi: 10.1177/21677026221100230.
8
Women Veterans' Healthcare Needs, Utilization, and Preferences in Veterans Affairs Primary Care Settings.女性退伍军人在退伍军人事务部初级保健环境中的医疗需求、利用和偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(Suppl 3):791-798. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07585-3. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
9
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Surveys and Population Screening Studies.亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)在军人和退伍军人中的研究:基于人群的调查和人群筛查研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 21;19(14):8853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148853.
10
Recovering from Intimate Partner Violence through Strengths and Empowerment (RISE): Initial Evaluation of the Clinical Effects of RISE Administered in Routine Care in the US Veterans Health Administration.通过优势和赋权(RISE)从亲密伴侣暴力中恢复:在美国退伍军人健康管理局常规护理中实施 RISE 的临床效果的初步评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 20;19(14):8793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148793.

审视退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)对女性退伍军人创伤性脑损伤筛查的效用:关于扩大筛查范围以纳入人际暴力的建议

Examining the Utility of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Traumatic Brain Injury Screening among Women Veterans: Recommendations for Expansion to Include Interpersonal Violence.

作者信息

Pebole Michelle M, Iverson Katherine M, Bolduc Caitlin M, Joyce Julie M, Sablone Caroline A, Fortier Catherine B

机构信息

The Translational Research Center for TBI and Stress Disorders (TRACTS), VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 14;14(8):814. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080814.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci14080814
PMID:39199505
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11352346/
Abstract

Women veterans (WVs) are more likely than men veterans to experience traumatic brain injury (TBI) from causes unrelated to deployment. Yet, current Veterans Health Administration (VHA) TBI screening focuses on deployment. This study examines the utility of the VHA TBI screening tool for WVs. Using the Boston Assessment for TBI-Lifetime (BAT-L) as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of the VHA screen were identified for deployment and non-deployment injuries. Injuries missed by the screen were thematically described. Sensitivity and specificity were compared by context (research, clinical). Ninety WVs were included; fifty-three (60.9%) met TBI criteria per the BAT-L. For TBIs occurring during deployment, sensitivity was higher in research (89.1%) compared to clinics (61.7%); specificity was lower in research (60.7%) compared to clinics (93.0%). The BAT-L identified 27 non-deployment TBIs not captured by the VHA screen, most frequently from physical assault or sports. The VHA screen does not include non-deployment events; thus, non-deployment sensitivity and specificity could not be calculated. For lifetime TBIs (deployment + non-deployment etiologies), sensitivity was higher in research (73.5%) compared to clinics (48.9%). Specificity was lower in research (60.0%) compared to clinics (100.0%). Findings can inform improvements to TBI screening among WVs, including expansion for interpersonal violence.

摘要

女性退伍军人比男性退伍军人更有可能因与部署无关的原因而遭受创伤性脑损伤(TBI)。然而,目前退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的TBI筛查重点是部署情况。本研究探讨了VHA的TBI筛查工具对女性退伍军人的实用性。以波士顿创伤性脑损伤终身评估(BAT-L)作为金标准,确定了VHA筛查对部署相关损伤和非部署相关损伤的敏感性和特异性。对筛查遗漏的损伤进行了主题描述。按背景(研究、临床)比较了敏感性和特异性。纳入了90名女性退伍军人;根据BAT-L,53名(60.9%)符合TBI标准。对于部署期间发生的TBI,研究中的敏感性(89.1%)高于临床(61.7%);研究中的特异性(60.7%)低于临床(93.0%)。BAT-L识别出27例VHA筛查未发现的非部署相关TBI,最常见于身体攻击或运动。VHA筛查不包括非部署事件;因此,无法计算非部署的敏感性和特异性。对于终身TBI(部署+非部署病因),研究中的敏感性(73.5%)高于临床(48.9%)。研究中的特异性(60.0%)低于临床(100.0%)。研究结果可为改善女性退伍军人的TBI筛查提供参考,包括扩大人际暴力方面的筛查。