Suppr超能文献

内感受敏感性和催眠易感性在运动想象中的作用。

The Role of Interoceptive Sensitivity and Hypnotizability in Motor Imagery.

作者信息

Malloggi Eleonora, Zelič Žan, Santarcangelo Enrica Laura

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.

Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno 31, 56127 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):832. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080832.

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) requires the mental representation of the body, obtained by integrating exteroceptive and interoceptive information. This study aimed to investigate the role of interoceptive sensitivity (IS) in MI performed through visual and kinesthetic modalities by participants with low (lows, = 26; SHSS: A, + : 1.00 + 1.52), medium (mediums, = 11; SHSS: A, 6.00 + 0.77) and high hypnotizability scores (highs, = 16; SHSS:A, 9.75 + 1.24), as measured by the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form A. The three groups displayed different MI abilities and IS levels. The efficacy of MI was measured using the chronometric index and self-reported experience, while IS was measured using the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) questionnaire. Alpha and beta power spectrum densities (PSDs) were extracted from the EEG signals acquired during baseline, actual movement and visually and kinesthetically imagined movements. The chronometric indices do not reveal significant differences between groups and imagery modalities. The self-report MI efficacy indicates better kinesthetic imagery in highs and mediums than in lows, and no modality difference among lows. The MAIA dimensions sustain the differences in subjective experience and almost all the EEG differences. The latter are slightly different in highs, mediums and lows. This is the first report of the major role played by IS in MI and strongly supports the theory of embodied cognition.

摘要

运动想象(MI)需要通过整合外感受和内感受信息来获得身体的心理表征。本研究旨在调查内感受敏感性(IS)在低催眠易感性(低分组,n = 26;斯坦福催眠易感性量表:A 型,得分:1.00 ± 1.52)、中等催眠易感性(中等分组,n = 11;斯坦福催眠易感性量表:A 型,得分:6.00 ± 0.77)和高催眠易感性(高分组,n = 16;斯坦福催眠易感性量表:A 型,得分:9.75 ± 1.24)的参与者通过视觉和动觉方式进行的运动想象中的作用。这三组表现出不同的运动想象能力和内感受敏感性水平。使用计时指标和自我报告的体验来衡量运动想象的效果,而使用内感受意识多维评估(MAIA)问卷来测量内感受敏感性。从基线、实际运动以及视觉和动觉想象运动期间采集的脑电图信号中提取α和β功率谱密度(PSD)。计时指标未显示出组间和想象方式之间的显著差异。自我报告的运动想象效果表明,高分组和中等分组在动觉想象方面比低分组更好,而低分组在不同方式之间没有差异。MAIA 维度证实了主观体验的差异以及几乎所有脑电图差异。后者在高分组、中等分组和低分组中略有不同。这是关于内感受敏感性在运动想象中起主要作用的首次报告,并有力地支持了具身认知理论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ec/11353101/23ca225e8b16/brainsci-14-00832-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验