Lastrucci Andrea, Morelli Ilaria, Votta Claudio, Maran Irene, Iosca Nicola, Monaco Ilaria Pia, Salvestrini Viola, Desideri Isacco, Marrazzo Livia, Wandael Yannick, Cornacchione Patrizia, Pallotta Stefania, Giansanti Daniele, Ricci Renzo, Livi Lorenzo, Bonomo Pierluigi
Department of Allied Health Professions, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 21;16(16):2899. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162899.
: The main goal of radiotherapy (RT) is to deliver a precise dose to the target while sparing the surrounding normal tissue and minimizing side effects. Appropriate patient immobilization is crucial, especially for head and neck cancer (HNC) and Brain Cancer (BC). Conventional closed-face masks (CFMs), while effective in minimizing head motion, can cause significant discomfort, anxiety, and claustrophobia. Open-face masks (OFMs) have been developed to increase patient comfort while providing precise immobilization. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and the Arskey and O'Malley framework, an electronic search of EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science was conducted to identify original studies reporting the use and description of OFMs in clinical practice up to April 2024. The inclusion criteria were English-language articles focusing on OFMs for HNC and BC patients undergoing RT. Of 618 titles, 19 articles fulfilled the selection criteria. Most studies were comparative ( = 13) or observational ( = 6). The articles were categorized by treatment site, resulting in three groups: BC ( = 14, 68.4%), HNC ( = 4, 21.4%), and mixed ( = 2, 10.5%), which includes both BC and HNC. Of note, 82.4% ( = 16) of the included studies were published from 2020 onwards, emphasizing the recent adoption of OFM in clinical practice. : The reviewed studies show that OFMs, in combination with SGRT, offer significant advantages in terms of patient comfort and positioning accuracy in HNC and BC treatments. Reproducibility in the sub-millimeter and sub-degree range can be achieved, which supports the use of OFMs in clinical practice. Future research should explore innovative combinations of immobilization and monitoring to further improve RT outcomes and ensure precise treatment while increasing patient comfort.
放射治疗(RT)的主要目标是在保护周围正常组织并将副作用降至最低的同时,向靶区精确输送剂量。适当的患者固定至关重要,尤其是对于头颈癌(HNC)和脑癌(BC)患者。传统的封闭面罩(CFM)虽然能有效减少头部运动,但会引起明显的不适、焦虑和幽闭恐惧症。开放式面罩(OFM)的开发旨在提高患者舒适度,同时提供精确的固定。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)扩展版用于范围综述以及Arskey和O'Malley框架,对EMBASE、PubMed、SCOPUS和Web of Science进行了电子检索,以识别截至2024年4月报告OFM在临床实践中的使用和描述的原始研究。纳入标准为聚焦于接受放疗的HNC和BC患者使用OFM的英文文章。在618篇标题中,19篇文章符合选择标准。大多数研究为比较性研究(n = 13)或观察性研究(n = 6)。文章按治疗部位分类,分为三组:BC(n = 14,68.4%)、HNC(n = 4,21.4%)和混合组(n = 2,10.5%),混合组包括BC和HNC。值得注意的是,纳入研究的82.4%(n = 16)是2020年以后发表的,强调了OFM在临床实践中的近期应用。综述研究表明,OFM与表面引导放疗(SGRT)相结合,在HNC和BC治疗中,在患者舒适度和定位准确性方面具有显著优势。可以实现亚毫米和亚度范围内的可重复性,这支持了OFM在临床实践中的应用。未来的研究应探索固定和监测的创新组合,以进一步改善放疗效果,确保精确治疗,同时提高患者舒适度。