Crabtree Jordan R, Mulenga Chilando M, Tran Khoa, Feinberg Konstantin, Santerre J Paul, Borschel Gregory H
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College St Room 407, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;11(8):776. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080776.
The regenerative capacity of the peripheral nervous system is limited, and peripheral nerve injuries often result in incomplete healing and poor outcomes even after repair. Transection injuries that induce a nerve gap necessitate microsurgical intervention; however, even the current gold standard of repair, autologous nerve graft, frequently results in poor functional recovery. Several interventions have been developed to augment the surgical repair of peripheral nerves, and the application of functional biomaterials, local delivery of bioactive substances, electrical stimulation, and allografts are among the most promising approaches to enhance innate healing across a nerve gap. Biocompatible polymers with optimized degradation rates, topographic features, and other functions provided by their composition have been incorporated into novel nerve conduits (NCs). Many of these allow for the delivery of drugs, neurotrophic factors, and whole cells locally to nerve repair sites, mitigating adverse effects that limit their systemic use. The electrical stimulation of repaired nerves in the perioperative period has shown benefits to healing and recovery in human trials, and novel biomaterials to enhance these effects show promise in preclinical models. The use of acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) circumvents the morbidity of donor nerve harvest necessitated by the use of autografts, and improvements in tissue-processing techniques may allow for more readily available and cost-effective options. Each of these interventions aid in neural regeneration after repair when applied independently, and their differing forms, benefits, and methods of application present ample opportunity for synergistic effects when applied in combination.
周围神经系统的再生能力有限,即使在修复后,周围神经损伤也常常导致愈合不完全和预后不良。导致神经间隙的横断伤需要显微外科干预;然而,即使是目前修复的金标准——自体神经移植,也常常导致功能恢复不佳。已经开发了几种干预措施来加强周围神经的手术修复,功能性生物材料的应用、生物活性物质的局部递送、电刺激和同种异体移植是增强神经间隙固有愈合的最有前景的方法之一。具有优化降解速率、形貌特征和由其组成提供的其他功能的生物相容性聚合物已被纳入新型神经导管(NCs)。其中许多允许将药物、神经营养因子和全细胞局部递送到神经修复部位,减轻限制其全身使用的不良反应。围手术期对修复神经进行电刺激在人体试验中已显示出对愈合和恢复有益,而增强这些效果的新型生物材料在临床前模型中显示出前景。脱细胞神经同种异体移植物(ANA)的使用避免了自体移植物所需的供体神经采集的发病率,并且组织处理技术的改进可能允许更易于获得和具有成本效益的选择。这些干预措施中的每一种在单独应用时都有助于修复后的神经再生,并且它们不同的形式、益处和应用方法在联合应用时提供了充分的协同效应机会。