• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估有机酸和超声波作为南瓜对流干燥动力学及品质参数预处理的效果。

Evaluation of Organic Acids and Ultrasound as Pretreatment in Convective Drying Kinetics and Quality Parameters of Pumpkin.

作者信息

Moura José R R de O, de Morais Blenda R S, da Silva João H F, Alves Amanda S S, Brandão Shirley C R, Azoubel Patricia M

机构信息

Departamento de Engenharia Química, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Arthur de Sá, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife 50740-521, PE, Brazil.

Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife 50670-901, PE, Brazil.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Aug 9;13(16):2502. doi: 10.3390/foods13162502.

DOI:10.3390/foods13162502
PMID:39200429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353359/
Abstract

There is a growing interest in the food industry in new drying technologies that reduce the time required for dehydration, combined with low energy consumption, low environmental impact, and maintenance of the overall quality of the product. This work investigated convective drying of pumpkin with and without ultrasound-organic (citric or acetic) acid pretreatment for different durations (10, 20, and 30 min). Drying was carried out at 60 °C, and the Wang and Singh model had the best fit for the experimental data. Samples pretreated for 30 min had the shortest drying times. Water diffusivities ranged from 6.68 × 10 m/s to 7.31 × 10 m/s, with the pretreated samples presenting the highest values. The dried pumpkin water activity values were below 0.60. Regarding color parameters, there was a slight increase in luminosity, a slight reduction in *, and a significant increase in *. Drying resulted in the loss of ascorbic acid and phenolic compounds, but the samples pretreated with citric acid showed better retention. There was also a reduction in the total carotenoid content, but samples pretreated with acetic acid for 10 and 20 min showed the best retention.

摘要

食品行业对新型干燥技术的兴趣日益浓厚,这些技术能减少脱水所需时间,同时具备低能耗、低环境影响以及保持产品整体质量的特点。本研究考察了南瓜在有无超声 - 有机(柠檬酸或乙酸)酸预处理不同时长(10、20和30分钟)下的对流干燥情况。干燥在60°C下进行,Wang和Singh模型对实验数据拟合效果最佳。预处理30分钟的样品干燥时间最短。水分扩散率在6.68×10⁻¹² m²/s至7.31×10⁻¹² m²/s之间,预处理样品的值最高。干燥南瓜的水分活度值低于0.60。关于颜色参数,亮度略有增加,*值略有降低,*值显著增加。干燥导致抗坏血酸和酚类化合物损失,但用柠檬酸预处理的样品保留效果更好。总类胡萝卜素含量也有所降低,但用乙酸预处理10和20分钟的样品保留效果最佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d59/11353359/fd0187ffd27a/foods-13-02502-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d59/11353359/5cc6e2f8d052/foods-13-02502-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d59/11353359/ac0d851ab6e7/foods-13-02502-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d59/11353359/fd0187ffd27a/foods-13-02502-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d59/11353359/5cc6e2f8d052/foods-13-02502-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d59/11353359/ac0d851ab6e7/foods-13-02502-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d59/11353359/fd0187ffd27a/foods-13-02502-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Organic Acids and Ultrasound as Pretreatment in Convective Drying Kinetics and Quality Parameters of Pumpkin.评估有机酸和超声波作为南瓜对流干燥动力学及品质参数预处理的效果。
Foods. 2024 Aug 9;13(16):2502. doi: 10.3390/foods13162502.
2
Influence of ultrasound pretreatment on drying characteristics of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) slices during convective hot air drying.超声预处理对香芋(黄肉芋)片热风对流干燥特性的影响
J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Mar 30;104(5):3047-3056. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13196. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Effect of Ethanol and Ultrasound Pretreatments on Pineapple Convective Drying.乙醇和超声预处理对菠萝对流干燥的影响。
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2021 Jun;59(2):209-215. doi: 10.17113/ftb.59.02.21.7045.
4
Convective drying of fruits: Effect of pretreatment, slice thickness and drying air temperature on drying kinetics and product quality.水果的对流干燥:预处理、切片厚度和干燥空气温度对干燥动力学及产品品质的影响
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 8;10(4):e25968. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25968. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
5
Quality retention in pumpkin powder dried by combined microwave-convective drying.微波对流联合干燥南瓜粉的品质保留情况
J Food Sci Technol. 2022 Apr;59(4):1558-1569. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05167-5. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
Effect of ultrasound pre-treatment on the drying kinetics of brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum.超声预处理对褐藻龙须菜干燥动力学的影响。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2015 Mar;23:302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
7
Power ultrasound as a pretreatment to convective drying of mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaves: Impact on drying kinetics and selected quality properties.功率超声预处理对桑(Morus alba L.)叶对流干燥的影响:对干燥动力学和选定品质特性的影响
Ultrason Sonochem. 2016 Jul;31:310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
Ultrasonic and osmotic pretreatments followed by convective and vacuum drying of papaya slices.木瓜片的超声和渗透预处理,以及对流和真空干燥。
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Apr;101(6):2264-2272. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10847. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Effect of Pulsed Electric Field Pretreatment on Drying Kinetics, Color, and Texture of Parsnip and Carrot.脉冲电场预处理对欧洲防风草和胡萝卜干燥动力学、颜色和质地的影响。
J Food Sci. 2018 Aug;83(8):2159-2166. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14216. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
Osmotic dehydration and convective drying of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) - The influence of ultrasound on process kinetics and product quality.猕猴桃(Actinidia deliciosa)的渗透脱水和对流干燥 - 超声对过程动力学和产品质量的影响。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2021 Mar;71:105377. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105377. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Process Optimization of Fluidized Bed Drying for Water Spinach: Evaluating the Effect of Blanching Through RSM and ANN Models.蕹菜流化床干燥的工艺优化:通过响应面法和人工神经网络模型评估热烫处理的效果
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Mar 24;13(4):e70114. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70114. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent development in high quality drying of fruits and vegetables assisted by ultrasound: A review.超声辅助高品质果蔬干燥技术的最新进展:综述。
Food Res Int. 2022 Feb;152:110744. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110744. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Effects of ultrasound, heat, ascorbic acid and CaCl treatments on color enhancement and flavor changes of freeze-dried carrots during the storage period.超声、热、抗坏血酸和氯化钙处理对冷冻干燥胡萝卜在贮藏期间颜色增强和风味变化的影响。
Food Chem. 2022 Mar 30;373(Pt B):131526. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131526. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
Effect of Ethanol and Ultrasound Pretreatments on Pineapple Convective Drying.
乙醇和超声预处理对菠萝对流干燥的影响。
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2021 Jun;59(2):209-215. doi: 10.17113/ftb.59.02.21.7045.
4
Effects of different pretreatment methods on the drying characteristics and quality of potatoes.不同预处理方法对马铃薯干燥特性及品质的影响
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Sep 29;8(11):5767-5775. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1579. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
Effect of ethanol pretreatment on melon convective drying.乙醇预处理对甜瓜对流干燥的影响。
Food Chem. 2020 Dec 15;333:127502. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127502. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
Infrared drying effects on the quality of eggplant slices and process optimization using response surface methodology.红外干燥对茄子片品质的影响及响应面法的工艺优化。
Food Chem. 2020 Dec 15;333:127423. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127423. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
7
Application of ultrasound technology in the drying of food products.超声技术在食品干燥中的应用。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 May;63:104950. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104950. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
8
Effects of osmotic dehydration (with and without sonication) and pectin-based coating pretreatments on functional properties and color of hot-air dried apricot cubes.渗透脱水(超声和非超声)和果胶基涂层预处理对热风干燥杏立方功能特性和颜色的影响。
Food Chem. 2020 May 1;311:125978. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125978. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
9
The Profile of Secondary Metabolites and Other Bioactive Compounds in L. and Pumpkin Cultivars.南瓜品种和 L. 品种次生代谢物及其他生物活性化合物的特征。
Molecules. 2019 Aug 14;24(16):2945. doi: 10.3390/molecules24162945.
10
High hydrostatic pressure treatments trigger de novo carotenoid biosynthesis in papaya fruit (Carica papaya cv. Maradol).高静压处理触发木瓜果实(Carica papaya cv. Maradol)中新的类胡萝卜素生物合成。
Food Chem. 2019 Mar 30;277:362-372. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.102. Epub 2018 Oct 23.