Brick Claudia, Su Heidi, Taylor Kirstin, Burgell Rebecca
Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4759. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164759.
The diagnosis of lower functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) is currently based on subjective and unreliable patient-reported symptoms, with significant clinical overlap between diagnosed phenotypes. Objective biomarkers are urgently sought. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) can objectively and non-invasively assess luminal contents. This study aimed to assess the utility of GIUS in phenotyping patients with lower FGIDs. : Patients with lower FGIDs underwent a GIUS and completed the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire, SAGIS questionnaire, and 100 mm VAS score for overall symptom severity. The faecal loading score (FLS) was obtained using a modified Leech score, where an FLS of >37 was consistent with clinically significant constipation. : Eighty-eight patients fulfilled the study requirements. In total, 56 met the Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subtypes, while 23 met the criteria for functional constipation (FC), 4 for functional diarrhoea (FD), and 5 for other diagnoses. Patients reporting constipation-predominant symptoms had a significantly higher median FLS than those describing diarrhoea-predominant symptoms (FLS = 40 [IQR 20.0-53.3] vs. 13.3 [IQR 6.7-40.0], respectively). However, 27% of patients describing diarrhoea had significant faecal loading on GIUS, and of those who described constipation, 34% did not have significant faecal loading. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of FLS-indicated constipation by the Rome IV criteria were low at 59% and 66%, respectively. : The symptom-based diagnosis of FGID subtypes based on the Rome IV criteria is a poor predictor of faecal loading. These findings should prompt further exploration of the limitations of symptom-based assessment and a shift towards physiological assessment of patients with FGIDs such as gastrointestinal ultrasound to develop more targeted therapy. Future research is underway to determine if targeting objective physiological endpoints results in improved clinical outcomes.
下消化道功能性胃肠病(FGIDs)的诊断目前基于患者主观且不可靠的症状报告,不同诊断类型之间存在显著的临床重叠。迫切需要客观的生物标志物。胃肠道超声(GIUS)能够客观且无创地评估管腔内的内容物。本研究旨在评估GIUS在对下消化道FGIDs患者进行分型中的作用。:下消化道FGIDs患者接受了GIUS检查,并完成了罗马IV诊断问卷、SAGIS问卷以及针对总体症状严重程度的100毫米视觉模拟评分(VAS)。采用改良的李氏评分获得粪便负荷评分(FLS),FLS>37与临床上显著的便秘相符。:88例患者符合研究要求。其中,56例符合罗马IV标准的肠易激综合征(IBS)亚型,23例符合功能性便秘(FC)标准,4例符合功能性腹泻(FD)标准,5例为其他诊断。报告以便秘为主症状的患者的中位FLS显著高于描述以腹泻为主症状的患者(分别为FLS = 40[四分位间距20.0 - 53.3]与13.3[四分位间距6.7 - 40.0])。然而,描述腹泻的患者中有27%在GIUS检查中有显著的粪便负荷,而描述便秘的患者中有34%没有显著的粪便负荷。根据罗马IV标准检测FLS提示的便秘的敏感性和特异性较低,分别为59%和66%。:基于罗马IV标准的FGID亚型的症状性诊断对粪便负荷的预测能力较差。这些发现应促使进一步探究基于症状评估的局限性,并转向对FGIDs患者进行生理评估,如胃肠道超声,以制定更具针对性的治疗方案。目前正在进行未来研究,以确定针对客观生理终点是否能改善临床结局。