Najjar-Debbiny Ronza, Nobili Alessandro, Mannuccio Mannucci Pier, Barnett-Griness Ofra, Saliba Walid, Adir Yochai, Antonella Galbussera Alessia, Tettamanti Mauro, D'Avanzo Barbara, Harari Sergio
Infection Control and Prevention Unit, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa 3436212, Israel.
Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3436212, Israel.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4766. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164766.
This retrospective study contrasts the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Lombardy (Italy) and Israel, focusing on mortality, healthcare response, public health measures, and demographics. We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 data from Lombardy and Israel covering four viral waves. Data included infection rates, hospitalizations, and mortality. In Lombardy, healthcare data were collected from the administrative database of the Lombardy Welfare Directorate; in Israel, they were collected from Clalit Health Services and the Israeli Ministry of Health's COVID-19 database. Statistical analyses compared trends in infection rates, demographics, and mortality rates across the four viral waves by using logistic and linear regression models and adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities. Lombardy exhibited significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 hospitalization rates during the first wave than Israel, with 71,558 cases over a population sample of ~10 million versus 5741 over a population sample of ~4.7 million in Israel. The majority of cases in Israel were managed at home, with 18 cases only (0.3%) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization during the first wave, compared to 4104 (5.7%) cases in Lombardy. Israel's vaccination campaign began earlier, so that by the fourth wave, 439,545 (42.2%) people in Israel were fully vaccinated with three doses, compared to 214,542 (22.9%) in Lombardy. Mortality decreased over time in both sites, dropping from 103 cases (1.8%) to 1550 (0.1%) in Israel and from 13,372 (18.7%) to 4388 (0.3%) in Lombardy. Early public health interventions and vaccination were crucial in managing the SARS-CoV-2 impact.
这项回顾性研究对比了新冠疫情在意大利伦巴第大区和以色列的影响,重点关注死亡率、医疗应对措施、公共卫生措施和人口统计学特征。我们分析了来自伦巴第大区和以色列的涵盖四个病毒传播阶段的新冠病毒数据。数据包括感染率、住院率和死亡率。在伦巴第大区,医疗数据从伦巴第福利局的行政数据库收集;在以色列,数据从克拉利特医疗服务机构和以色列卫生部的新冠病毒数据库收集。统计分析通过使用逻辑回归和线性回归模型,并对年龄、性别和合并症进行调整,比较了四个病毒传播阶段的感染率、人口统计学特征和死亡率趋势。在第一波疫情期间,伦巴第大区的新冠病毒感染率和新冠住院率显著高于以色列,在约1000万人口样本中有71558例病例,而以色列在约470万人口样本中有5741例病例。以色列的大多数病例在家中接受治疗,在第一波疫情期间只有18例(0.3%)需要入住重症监护病房(ICU),而伦巴第大区有4104例(5.7%)。以色列的疫苗接种运动开始得更早,因此到第四波疫情时,以色列有439545人(42.2%)完成了三剂次的全程接种,而伦巴第大区有214542人(22.9%)。两个地区的死亡率都随时间下降,以色列从103例(1.8%)降至1,550例(约0.1%),伦巴第大区从13372例(18.7%)降至4388例(0.3%)。早期的公共卫生干预措施和疫苗接种对于应对新冠病毒的影响至关重要。