Sanak Tomasz, Putowski Mateusz, Dąbrowski Marek, Kwinta Anna, Zawisza Katarzyna, Morajda Andrzej, Puślecki Mateusz
Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Cracow, Poland.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital in Cracow, 30-688 Cracow, Poland.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;12(16):1613. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161613.
The acronym CALL TO ECLS has been proposed as a potential tool to support decision-making in critical communication moments when qualifying a patient for the ECPR procedure. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of the acronym and validate its content. Validation is crucial to ensure that the acronym is theoretically correct and includes the necessary information that must be conveyed by EMS during the qualification of a patient with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for ECMO. A survey was conducted using the LimeSurvey platform through the Survey Research System of the Jagiellonian University Medical College over a 6-month period (from December 2022 to May 2023). Usefulness, importance, clarity, and unambiguity were rated on a 4-point Likert scale, from 1 (not useful, not important, unclear, ambiguous) to 4 (useful, important, clear, unambiguous). On the 4-point scale, the Content Validity Index (I-CVI) was calculated as the percentage of subject matter experts who rated the criterion as having a level of importance/clarity/validity/uniqueness of 3 or 4. The Scale-level Content Validity Index (S-CVI) based on the average method was computed as the average of I-CVI scores (S-CVI-AVE) for all considered criteria (protocol). The number of fully completed surveys by experts was 35, and partial completion was obtained in 63 cases. All criteria were deemed significant/useful, with I-CVI coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.97. Similarly, the importance of all criteria was confirmed, as all I-CVI coefficients were greater than 0.78 (ranging from 0.83 to 0.97). The average I-CVI score for the ten considered criteria in terms of usefulness/significance and importance exceeded 0.9, indicating high validity of the tool/protocol/acronym. Based on the survey results and analysis of responses provided by experts, a second version was created, incorporating additional explanations. In Criterion 10, an explanation was added-"Signs of life"-during conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ROSC, motor response during CPR). It has been shown that the acronym CALL TO ECLS, according to experts, is accurate and contains the necessary content, and can serve as a system to facilitate communication between the pre-hospital environment and specialized units responsible for qualifying patients for the ECPR.
首字母缩写词CALL TO ECLS已被提议作为一种潜在工具,用于在判定患者是否适合接受体外心肺复苏(ECPR)程序的关键沟通时刻辅助决策。本研究的目的是评估该首字母缩写词的准确性并验证其内容。验证至关重要,以确保该首字母缩写词在理论上正确无误,并且包含急救医疗服务(EMS)在判定院外心脏骤停患者是否适合接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗时必须传达的必要信息。通过雅盖隆大学医学院的调查研究系统,使用LimeSurvey平台进行了为期6个月(从2022年12月至2023年5月)的调查。有用性、重要性、清晰度和明确性采用4级李克特量表进行评分,从1分(无用、不重要、不清晰、不明确)到4分(有用、重要、清晰、明确)。在4级量表上,内容效度指数(I-CVI)计算为将该标准评定为重要性/清晰度/效度/独特性水平为3或4的主题专家的百分比。基于平均法的量表级内容效度指数(S-CVI)计算为所有考虑标准(方案)的I-CVI分数(S-CVI-AVE)的平均值。专家完全完成的调查问卷数量为35份,63例为部分完成。所有标准均被认为具有重要性/有用性,I-CVI系数范围为0.87至0.97。同样,所有标准的重要性都得到了确认,因为所有I-CVI系数均大于0.78(范围为0.83至0.97)。就有用性/重要性和重要性而言,所考虑的十个标准的平均I-CVI分数超过0.9,表明该工具/方案/首字母缩写词具有较高的效度。根据调查结果以及对专家提供的回复的分析,创建了包含额外解释的第二版。在标准10中,添加了解释——“生命体征”——在传统心肺复苏期间(恢复自主循环、心肺复苏期间的运动反应)。结果表明,根据专家的说法,首字母缩写词CALL TO ECLS准确无误且包含必要内容,可作为一种促进院前环境与负责判定患者是否适合接受ECPR的专业单位之间沟通的系统。