• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症的靶向筛查:经验教训及对黑色素瘤的适用性:一项范围综述

Targeted Screening for Cancer: Learnings and Applicability to Melanoma: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Zheng Lejie, Smit Amelia K, Cust Anne E, Janda Monika

机构信息

Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia.

The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 14;14(8):863. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080863.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14080863
PMID:39202054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355139/
Abstract

This scoping review aims to systematically gather evidence from personalized cancer-screening studies across various cancers, summarize key components and outcomes, and provide implications for a future personalized melanoma-screening strategy. Peer-reviewed articles and clinical trial databases were searched for, with restrictions on language and publication date. Sixteen distinct studies were identified and included in this review. The studies' results were synthesized according to key components, including risk assessment, risk thresholds, screening pathways, and primary outcomes of interest. Studies most frequently reported about breast cancers ( = 7), followed by colorectal ( = 5), prostate ( = 2), lung ( = 1), and ovarian cancers ( = 1). The identified screening programs were evaluated predominately in Europe ( = 6) and North America ( = 4). The studies employed multiple different risk assessment tools, screening schedules, and outcome measurements, with few consistent approaches identified across the studies. The benefit-harm assessment of each proposed personalized screening program indicated that the majority were feasible and effective. The establishment of a personalized screening program is complex, but results of the reviewed studies indicate that it is feasible, can improve participation rates, and screening outcomes. While the review primarily examines screening programs for cancers other than melanoma, the insights can be used to inform the development of a personalized melanoma screening strategy.

摘要

本范围综述旨在系统地收集各类癌症个性化癌症筛查研究的证据,总结关键组成部分和结果,并为未来的个性化黑色素瘤筛查策略提供启示。检索了同行评审文章和临床试验数据库,并对语言和出版日期进行了限制。共识别出16项不同的研究并纳入本综述。根据关键组成部分对研究结果进行了综合,包括风险评估、风险阈值、筛查途径和感兴趣的主要结果。研究报告最多的是乳腺癌(n = 7),其次是结直肠癌(n = 5)、前列腺癌(n = 2)、肺癌(n = 1)和卵巢癌(n = 1)。已确定的筛查项目主要在欧洲(n = 6)和北美(n = 4)进行了评估。这些研究采用了多种不同的风险评估工具、筛查时间表和结果测量方法,研究中几乎没有发现一致的方法。对每个提议的个性化筛查项目的利弊评估表明,大多数项目是可行且有效的。建立个性化筛查项目很复杂,但综述研究的结果表明,它是可行的,可以提高参与率和筛查效果。虽然本综述主要研究黑色素瘤以外癌症的筛查项目,但这些见解可用于为个性化黑色素瘤筛查策略的制定提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b293/11355139/a53f5b5f6cad/jpm-14-00863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b293/11355139/a53f5b5f6cad/jpm-14-00863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b293/11355139/a53f5b5f6cad/jpm-14-00863-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Targeted Screening for Cancer: Learnings and Applicability to Melanoma: A Scoping Review.癌症的靶向筛查:经验教训及对黑色素瘤的适用性:一项范围综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 14;14(8):863. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080863.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Pain Assessment Tools for Infants, Children, and Adolescents With Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review.癌症婴幼儿及青少年疼痛评估工具:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 28;14:e66614. doi: 10.2196/66614.
5
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
6
Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.针对乳腺癌平均风险女性进行数字化乳腺钼靶筛查,针对高风险女性进行磁共振成像(MRI)筛查:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(3):1-55. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
7
A Scoping Review of Personalized, Interactive, Web-Based Clinical Decision Tools Available for Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening in the United States.美国可用于乳腺癌预防和筛查的个性化、交互式、基于网络的临床决策工具的范围综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 17;9(1):23814683241236511. doi: 10.1177/23814683241236511. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
8
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
9
Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.针对40至49岁患乳腺癌平均风险女性的乳腺钼靶筛查:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1.
10
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation considerations for risk-tailored cancer screening in the population: A scoping review.风险定制癌症筛查在人群中的实施考虑因素:范围综述。
Prev Med. 2024 Apr;181:107897. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107897. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
2
Ecological study estimating melanoma overdiagnosis in the USA using the lifetime risk method.使用终生风险法对美国黑色素瘤过度诊断情况进行估计的生态学研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):156-161. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112460.
3
Management of cutaneous melanoma in Australia: a narrative review.
澳大利亚皮肤黑色素瘤的管理:一项叙述性综述。
Med J Aust. 2023 May 15;218(9):426-431. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51910. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
4
Melanoma risk prediction based on a polygenic risk score and clinical risk factors.基于多基因风险评分和临床危险因素的黑色素瘤风险预测。
Melanoma Res. 2023 Aug 1;33(4):293-299. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000896. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.皮肤癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的最新证据报告和系统评价
JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1296-1307. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.3262.
6
The Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) trial: a randomised controlled trial of a decision support tool for risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌风险预测(CRISP)试验:一种用于风险分层结直肠癌筛查的决策支持工具的随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jul 27;73(733):e556-e565. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0480. Print 2023 Aug.
7
Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420).实时常规实施风险分层乳腺癌筛查与常规筛查相比的效果量化:BC-Predict 非随机对照研究(NCT04359420)。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Jun;128(11):2063-2071. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02250-w. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
8
Early Detection and Prognostic Assessment of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus on Optimal Practice and the Role of Gene Expression Profile Testing.皮肤黑色素瘤的早期检测和预后评估:最佳实践的共识以及基因表达谱测试的作用。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 May 1;159(5):545-553. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0127.
9
Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public: A mixed-methods systematic review.基于公众视角的人群癌症筛查中风险分层的可接受性:一项混合方法系统评价。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):989-1008. doi: 10.1111/hex.13739. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
10
Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support implementation.基于人群的癌症筛查中风险分层的可接受性:从医疗保健专业人员的角度出发的混合方法系统评价及实施建议。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0279201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279201. eCollection 2023.