• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

东亚人群下颌骨舌侧凹陷解剖结构的锥形束计算机断层扫描形态学分析——一项回顾性研究

Morphological Analysis of the Anatomical Mandibular Lingual Concavity Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in East Asian Population-A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Ahn Hee-Ju, Byun Soo-Hwan, Che Sung-Ah, Park Sang-Yoon, Yi Sang-Min, Park In-Young, On Sung-Woon, Yang Byoung-Eun

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea.

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;14(16):1792. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161792.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14161792
PMID:39202280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353795/
Abstract

The rising demand for dental implants necessitates addressing anatomical challenges, particularly the shape of the mandible. Incorrectly angling implants can cause lingual perforations, risking damage to the inferior alveolar artery and nerve. This study analyzed 96 cone-beam computed tomography images from individuals aged 20 to 70 (8 males and 8 females) to evaluate mandibular anatomy in four areas: left and right sides and the first and second molars. Mandibular shapes were classified into U, C, and P types. U-shaped mandibles, with a wider crest width, pose the highest risk of lingual perforation. Measurements for U-shaped types included concavity angle, length, and depth. Statistical analyses (T-tests and ANOVA) with a 95% confidence interval showed no significant differences between the left and right sides. However, significant differences based on gender, age, and tooth type were found. The study found U-shapes in 34.6% of cases, P-shapes in 28.9%, and C-shapes in 36.5%, with U-shapes more common in second molars. Understanding these variations enhances the safety and effectiveness of implant procedures and oral surgeries.

摘要

对牙种植体需求的不断增加,使得解决解剖学挑战成为必要,尤其是下颌骨的形状。种植体角度不正确会导致舌侧穿孔,有损伤下牙槽动脉和神经的风险。本研究分析了96例年龄在20至70岁之间个体(8名男性和8名女性)的锥形束计算机断层扫描图像,以评估四个区域的下颌骨解剖结构:左右两侧以及第一和第二磨牙处。下颌骨形状分为U型、C型和P型。嵴宽度较宽的U型下颌骨发生舌侧穿孔的风险最高。U型下颌骨的测量指标包括凹陷角度、长度和深度。采用95%置信区间的统计分析(t检验和方差分析)显示,左右两侧之间无显著差异。然而,基于性别、年龄和牙齿类型发现了显著差异。研究发现,34.6%的病例为U型,28.9%为P型,36.5%为C型,U型在第二磨牙中更为常见。了解这些变异可提高种植手术和口腔外科手术的安全性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/274f7cfec708/diagnostics-14-01792-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/9d6bc960d61e/diagnostics-14-01792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/ac0e188e68fa/diagnostics-14-01792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/5b36276fabe7/diagnostics-14-01792-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/ba65f3e71845/diagnostics-14-01792-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/274f7cfec708/diagnostics-14-01792-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/9d6bc960d61e/diagnostics-14-01792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/ac0e188e68fa/diagnostics-14-01792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/5b36276fabe7/diagnostics-14-01792-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/ba65f3e71845/diagnostics-14-01792-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad4e/11353795/274f7cfec708/diagnostics-14-01792-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Morphological Analysis of the Anatomical Mandibular Lingual Concavity Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in East Asian Population-A Retrospective Study.东亚人群下颌骨舌侧凹陷解剖结构的锥形束计算机断层扫描形态学分析——一项回顾性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;14(16):1792. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161792.
2
Evaluation of anatomic variations of mandibular lingual concavities from cone beam computed tomography scans in a Malaysian population.评价马来西亚人群下颌舌侧窝的锥形束 CT 扫描解剖变异。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):766.e1-766.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
3
Effects of Crest Morphology on Lingual Concavity in Mandibular Molar Region: an Observational Study.嵴形态对下颌磨牙区舌侧凹陷的影响:一项观察性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2023 Mar 31;14(1):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14103. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
4
Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Analysis of the Posterior and Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity for Dental Implant Patients.牙种植患者下颌前后舌侧凹陷的锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Feb;43(1):12-18. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00084. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
5
Radiomorphometric analysis of edentulous posterior mandibular ridges in the first molar region: a cone-beam computed tomography study.第一磨牙区无牙下颌后牙嵴的放射形态计量分析:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019 Nov 11;50(1):28-37. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.28. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.下颌后区舌板穿孔风险评估:锥形束 CT 引导下的虚拟种植体放置研究。
J Periodontol. 2011 Jan;82(1):129-35. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100313. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
7
Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 对下颌舌侧窝进行的横断面分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Feb;22(2):201-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
8
Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.下颌后牙区即刻种植时下牙槽神经损伤的风险评估:一项虚拟种植体植入研究
J Dent. 2014 Mar;42(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
9
Quantitative and qualitative 3D analysis of mandibular lingual concavities: Implications for dental implant planning in the posterior mandible.下颌舌侧窝的定量和定性 3D 分析:对下颌后牙区种植规划的影响。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Feb;10(1):e858. doi: 10.1002/cre2.858.
10
Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants.需要种植牙的患者下颌下窝的断层容积评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jan;109(1):e32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.035.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of anatomic variations of mandibular lingual concavities from cone beam computed tomography scans in a Malaysian population.评价马来西亚人群下颌舌侧窝的锥形束 CT 扫描解剖变异。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):766.e1-766.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Population genomics of East Asian ethnic groups.东亚族群的群体基因组学。
Hereditas. 2020 Dec 8;157(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s41065-020-00162-w.
3
Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets.
评估 826 个下颌后窝中深舌凹的频率。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Nov;48(11):1045-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Assessment of Lingual Concavities in Submandibular Fossa Region in Patients requiring Dental Implants-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.牙种植患者下颌下窝区域舌侧凹陷的评估——一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1329-1333.
5
Correlation between the visibility of submandibular fossa and mandibular canal cortication on panoramic radiographs and submandibular fossa depth on CBCT.全景X线片上下颌下窝及下颌管皮质的显影与CBCT上下颌下窝深度之间的相关性
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018 Jan 1;23(1):e105-e111. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22115.
6
Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry.短种植体:种植牙科学的新视野。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep;10(9):ZE14-ZE17. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21838.8550. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Analysis of the Posterior and Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity for Dental Implant Patients.牙种植患者下颌前后舌侧凹陷的锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Feb;43(1):12-18. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00084. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
8
Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications.下颌骨后部区域骨形态的回顾性研究。舌侧凹陷的患病率、程度及其可能并发症的评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Nov 1;21(6):e731-e736. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21256.
9
Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.在牙种植手术中使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌后牙区标志点
Ann Anat. 2016 May;205:53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.下颌骨的舌侧凹陷:一项使用CBCT确定的横断面分析进行的形态学研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;43(2):254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Nov 26.