Emergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska ul. 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Prehospital Unit, Emergency Medical Services Unit, Community Health Center Dr Adolfa Drolca Maribor, Cesta Proletarskih Brigad 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 21;60(8):1363. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081363.
: As the first three links of the chain of survival of victims of cardiac arrest depend on prompt action by bystanders, it is important to educate as much of the population as possible about basic life support and use of an automatic external defibrillator (BLS and AED). Schoolchildren are an accessible population that can be easily taught and numerous BLS and AED courses are available. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two different practical approaches to teaching BLS and AED. : We compared two different BLS and AED courses (course A and B) offered to 280 eighth- and ninth-grade students in primary schools. Knowledge about and the intention to perform BLS and AED were evaluated using validated questionnaires before and after the courses. Descriptive methods were used to describe the results. To compare courses, we used the Mann-Whitney U test. A value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. : Differences in knowledge and intention to perform BLS and AED after the courses were significant between courses ( < 0.001 and = 0.037, respectively). After course A, students demonstrated significantly better knowledge and numerically greater intention to perform BLS and AED (intention score 6.55 ± 0.61 out of 7). : Courses in which students have the opportunity to individually practice BLS skills show a greater increase in knowledge and in intention to perform BLS and AED.
:由于心脏骤停患者生存链的前三个环节依赖于旁观者的迅速行动,因此对尽可能多的人群进行基本生命支持和使用自动体外除颤器(BLS 和 AED)的教育非常重要。学童是一个容易接触到的人群,可以轻松地对其进行教育,并且有许多 BLS 和 AED 课程可供选择。本研究旨在评估两种不同的实用 BLS 和 AED 教学方法的有效性。:我们比较了两种不同的 BLS 和 AED 课程(课程 A 和 B),这些课程提供给了小学 8 年级和 9 年级的 280 名学生。在课程前后,使用经过验证的问卷评估了学生对 BLS 和 AED 的了解程度和实施意愿。使用描述性方法描述结果。为了比较课程,我们使用了 Mann-Whitney U 检验。<0.05 的 值被认为具有统计学意义。:课程结束后,学生对 BLS 和 AED 的知识和实施意愿存在差异(分别为<0.001 和=0.037)。在课程 A 之后,学生的知识和实施 BLS 和 AED 的意愿明显提高(意愿得分分别为 7 分中的 6.55±0.61)。:学生有机会单独练习 BLS 技能的课程,知识和实施 BLS 和 AED 的意愿的提高幅度更大。