• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于梯度提升回归树的纤维增强聚合物增强混凝土板冲切剪切强度的机器学习预测模型

Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Punching Shear Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Slabs Using a Gradient-Boosted Regression Tree.

作者信息

Abood Emad A, Abdallah Marwa Hameed, Alsaadi Mahmood, Imran Hamza, Bernardo Luís Filipe Almeida, De Domenico Dario, Henedy Sadiq N

机构信息

Department of Material Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Shatrah University, Al-Shatrah 64007, Iraq.

Department of Civil Engineering, Najaf Technical Institute, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Najaf Munazira Str., Najaf 54003, Iraq.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;17(16):3964. doi: 10.3390/ma17163964.

DOI:10.3390/ma17163964
PMID:39203141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355707/
Abstract

Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) are increasingly being used as a composite material in concrete slabs due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and resistance to corrosion. However, FRP-reinforced concrete slabs, similar to traditional systems, are susceptible to punching shear failure, a critical design concern. Existing empirical models and design provisions for predicting the punching shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete slabs often exhibit significant bias and dispersion. These errors highlight the need for more reliable predictive models. This study aims to develop gradient-boosted regression tree (GBRT) models to accurately predict the shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete panels and to address the limitations of existing empirical models. A comprehensive database of 238 sets of experimental results for FRP-reinforced concrete slabs has been compiled from the literature. Different machine learning algorithms were considered, and the performance of GBRT models was evaluated against these algorithms. The dataset was divided into training and testing sets to verify the accuracy of the model. The results indicated that the GBRT model achieved the highest prediction accuracy, with root mean square error (RMSE) of 64.85, mean absolute error (MAE) of 42.89, and coefficient of determination (R) of 0.955. Comparative analysis with existing experimental models showed that the GBRT model outperformed these traditional approaches. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the GBRT model, providing insight into the contribution of each input variable to the prediction of punching shear strength. The analysis emphasized the importance of variables such as slab thickness, FRP reinforcement ratio, and critical section perimeter. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the GBRT model in predicting the punching shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete slabs with high accuracy. SHAP analysis elucidates key factors that influence model predictions and provides valuable insights for future research and design improvements.

摘要

由于纤维增强聚合物(FRP)具有高强度重量比和耐腐蚀性能,它们在混凝土板中越来越多地被用作复合材料。然而,与传统体系类似,FRP增强混凝土板容易发生冲切剪切破坏,这是一个关键的设计问题。现有的用于预测FRP增强混凝土板冲切剪切强度的经验模型和设计规定往往存在显著的偏差和离散性。这些误差凸显了对更可靠预测模型的需求。本研究旨在开发梯度提升回归树(GBRT)模型,以准确预测FRP增强混凝土板的抗剪强度,并解决现有经验模型的局限性。从文献中收集了一个包含238组FRP增强混凝土板实验结果的综合数据库。考虑了不同的机器学习算法,并针对这些算法评估了GBRT模型的性能。将数据集分为训练集和测试集以验证模型的准确性。结果表明,GBRT模型实现了最高的预测精度,均方根误差(RMSE)为64.85,平均绝对误差(MAE)为42.89,决定系数(R)为0.955。与现有实验模型的对比分析表明,GBRT模型优于这些传统方法。使用SHapley加法解释(SHAP)方法对GBRT模型进行解释,深入了解每个输入变量对冲切剪切强度预测的贡献。分析强调了板厚、FRP配筋率和临界截面周长等变量的重要性。本研究证明了GBRT模型在高精度预测FRP增强混凝土板冲切剪切强度方面的有效性。SHAP分析阐明了影响模型预测的关键因素,并为未来的研究和设计改进提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/b7e43619392a/materials-17-03964-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/9fa9a96ecc13/materials-17-03964-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/ef94c56ed844/materials-17-03964-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/0c94c3ec802e/materials-17-03964-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/5ed29eba08ee/materials-17-03964-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/b564933fc6e4/materials-17-03964-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/852062ae0e85/materials-17-03964-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/35074f473c2e/materials-17-03964-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/986f63714da1/materials-17-03964-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/d824d65524ed/materials-17-03964-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/33e01e627800/materials-17-03964-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/945d4d4ccbe9/materials-17-03964-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/b7e43619392a/materials-17-03964-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/9fa9a96ecc13/materials-17-03964-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/ef94c56ed844/materials-17-03964-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/0c94c3ec802e/materials-17-03964-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/5ed29eba08ee/materials-17-03964-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/b564933fc6e4/materials-17-03964-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/852062ae0e85/materials-17-03964-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/35074f473c2e/materials-17-03964-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/986f63714da1/materials-17-03964-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/d824d65524ed/materials-17-03964-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/33e01e627800/materials-17-03964-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/945d4d4ccbe9/materials-17-03964-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1965/11355707/b7e43619392a/materials-17-03964-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Punching Shear Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Slabs Using a Gradient-Boosted Regression Tree.基于梯度提升回归树的纤维增强聚合物增强混凝土板冲切剪切强度的机器学习预测模型
Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;17(16):3964. doi: 10.3390/ma17163964.
2
A Novel Feature Selection Approach Based on Tree Models for Evaluating the Punching Shear Capacity of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs.一种基于树模型的新型特征选择方法,用于评估钢纤维增强混凝土平板的冲切剪切能力。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 3;13(17):3902. doi: 10.3390/ma13173902.
3
Designing a reliable machine learning system for accurately estimating the ultimate condition of FRP-confined concrete.设计一个可靠的机器学习系统,用于准确估计纤维增强塑料(FRP)约束混凝土的最终状态。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 3;14(1):20466. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69990-4.
4
Punching Shear Behavior of Slabs Made from Different Types of Concrete Internally Reinforced with SHCC-Filled Steel Tubes.内部用填充高性能应变硬化水泥基复合材料(SHCC)的钢管增强的不同类型混凝土制成的板的冲切剪切性能
Materials (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;16(1):72. doi: 10.3390/ma16010072.
5
Punching Shear Behavior of Two-Way Concrete Slabs Reinforced with Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars.玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)筋增强双向混凝土板的冲切剪切性能
Polymers (Basel). 2018 Aug 9;10(8):893. doi: 10.3390/polym10080893.
6
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Laminates for Strengthening of RC Slabs against Punching Shear: A Review.用于增强钢筋混凝土板抗冲剪性能的纤维增强聚合物层压板:综述
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;12(3):685. doi: 10.3390/polym12030685.
7
Metaheuristic Optimization of Random Forest for Predicting Punch Shear Strength of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams.用于预测纤维增强塑料(FRP)加固混凝土梁冲剪强度的随机森林元启发式优化
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 28;16(11):4034. doi: 10.3390/ma16114034.
8
Intelligent prediction modeling for flexural capacity of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beams using machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的纤维增强塑料(FRP)加固钢筋混凝土梁抗弯承载力智能预测模型
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 7;10(1):e23375. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23375. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
9
Experimental Study on Monitoring Damage Progression of Basalt-FRP Reinforced Concrete Slabs Using Acoustic Emission and Machine Learning.基于声发射和机器学习监测玄武岩纤维增强混凝土板损伤发展的试验研究
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;23(20):8356. doi: 10.3390/s23208356.
10
Investigating the Bond Strength of FRP Laminates with Concrete Using LIGHT GBM and SHAPASH Analysis.使用轻量级梯度提升机(LIGHT GBM)和SHAPASH分析研究纤维增强复合材料(FRP)层压板与混凝土之间的粘结强度。
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;14(21):4717. doi: 10.3390/polym14214717.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial for "Mechanical Behavior of Concrete Materials and Structures: Experimental Evidence and Analytical Models (Volume II)".《混凝土材料与结构的力学行为:实验证据与分析模型(第二卷)》编辑评论
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 27;18(3):584. doi: 10.3390/ma18030584.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-Way Shear Resistance of FRP Reinforced-Concrete Slabs: Data and a Comparative Study.纤维增强塑料(FRP)增强混凝土板的双向抗剪性能:数据与对比研究
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Sep 11;14(18):3799. doi: 10.3390/polym14183799.
2
Punching Shear Strength of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Slabs without Shear Reinforcements: A Reliability Assessment.无抗剪钢筋的纤维增强塑料(FRP)增强混凝土板的冲切抗剪强度:可靠性评估
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Apr 25;14(9):1743. doi: 10.3390/polym14091743.
3
Punching Shear Behavior of Two-Way Concrete Slabs Reinforced with Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars.
玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)筋增强双向混凝土板的冲切剪切性能
Polymers (Basel). 2018 Aug 9;10(8):893. doi: 10.3390/polym10080893.