Yang Wanqi, González Pablo A, Xin Qianqian, Reyes Mari Rose De Los, Villalobos Ralph Elvi, Borja-Tabora Charissa Fay Corazon, Bermal Nancy Nazaire, Kalergis Alexis M, Yu Dan, Wu Wenbin, Bueno Susan M, Huo Liqun, Calvo Mario, Zeng Gang, Li Jing
Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China.
Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago 7810128, Chile.
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Aug 7;12(8):892. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12080892.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) developed by Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd. (Sinovac, Beijing, China) by comparing its immunogenicity and safety with a comparator QIV (Vaxigrip Tetra) in a population aged 3 years and older in Chile and the Philippines.
A phase 3, non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted in the southern hemisphere (SH) 2023 influenza season. Participants aged ≥ 3 years old with stable health were randomized 1:1 to receive either Sinovac QIV or comparator QIV. The co-primary outcomes were immunological non-inferiority for Sinovac QIV versus the comparator against each strain contained in the vaccines in terms of seroconversion rates (SCRs) and geometric mean titers (GMTs) of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies 28 days after final vaccination.
A total of 2039 participants were vaccinated (1019 Sinovac QIV; 1020 comparator QIV). Sinovac QIV induced non-inferior immune responses to all four strains as compared to comparator QIV, with slightly higher GMTs than those of comparator QIV: GMT ratios (lower limit 95% confidence interval (CI)) were 1.8 (1.6) for A(H1N1), 1.4 (1.3) for A (H3N2), 1.3 (1.1) for B Victoria and 1.2 (1.1) for B Yamagata; observed seroconversion rate differences (lower limit 95% CI) were 9.6% (6.7) for A(H1N1), 7.0% (3.5) for A(H3N2), 2.4% (-0.03) for B Victoria and 6.8% (3.0) for B Yamagata. Adverse reactions were similar across the two groups and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported.
The immunogenicity of Sinovac QIV was non-inferior to that of the comparator QIV in these populations aged 3 years and older, and safety was comparable.
在本研究中,我们旨在通过比较北京科兴生物制品有限公司(中国北京,科兴)研发的四价流感疫苗(QIV)与对照四价流感疫苗(Vaxigrip Tetra)在智利和菲律宾3岁及以上人群中的免疫原性和安全性,来评估其非劣效性。
在南半球2023年流感季节进行了一项3期、非劣效性、双盲、随机对照、多中心临床试验。年龄≥3岁且健康状况稳定的参与者按1:1随机分组,分别接受科兴QIV或对照QIV。共同主要结局是在最后一剂疫苗接种28天后,就血凝抑制(HI)抗体的血清转化率(SCR)和几何平均滴度(GMT)而言,科兴QIV相对于对照疫苗对疫苗中所含每种毒株的免疫非劣效性。
共有2039名参与者接种了疫苗(1019名接种科兴QIV;1020名接种对照QIV)。与对照QIV相比,科兴QIV对所有四种毒株均诱导出非劣效的免疫反应,其GMT略高于对照QIV:A(H1N1)的GMT比值(95%置信区间下限)为1.8(1.6),A(H3N2)为1.4(1.3),B维多利亚系为1.3(1.1),B山形系为1.2(1.1);观察到的血清转化率差异(95%置信区间下限)A(H1N1)为9.6%(6.7),A(H3N2)为7.0%(3.5),B维多利亚系为2.4%(-0.03),B山形系为6.8%(3.0)。两组的不良反应相似,未报告与疫苗相关的严重不良事件。
在这些3岁及以上人群中,科兴QIV的免疫原性不劣于对照QIV,且安全性相当。