• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血流分流器的选择如何影响被困眼动脉内的血流变化:一项计算流体动力学研究

How Flow Diverter Selection Can Affect the Flow Changes within a Jailed Ophthalmic Artery: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.

作者信息

Ünsal Can, Güçlü Görkem, Olcay Ali Bahadir, Hassankhani Amir, Bilgin Cem, Hakyemez Bahattin

机构信息

Numerical Simulation and Spray Targeting Division, Department of Engineering, Bosch, Bursa, Türkiye.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, United States.

出版信息

Asian J Neurosurg. 2024 Jun 27;19(3):426-434. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787868. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787868
PMID:39205892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349421/
Abstract

Flow diverter (FD) stents are widely used to treat giant aneurysms by reducing blood flow into the aneurysm sac. However, choosing the optimal FD for a patient can be challenging when a nearby artery, such as the ophthalmic artery (OA), is jailed by the FD placement. This study compares the impact of two FD stents with different effective metal surface area (EMSA) values on OA occlusion.  A numerical model of a 59-year-old female patient with a giant aneurysm in the left internal carotid artery and a jailed OA was created based on clinical data. Two FD stents, FRED4017 and FRED4518, with different EMSA values at the aneurysm neck and OA inlet, were virtually deployed in the model. Blood flow and occlusion amount in the OA were simulated and compared between the two FD stents.  FRED4017 had higher EMSA values than FRED4518 at the aneurysm neck (35% vs. 24.6%) and lower EMSA values at the OA inlet (15% vs. 21.2%). FRED4017 caused more occlusion in the OA than FRED4518 (40% vs. 28%), indicating a higher risk of ocular ischemic syndrome.  The EMSA value of FD stents affects the blood flow and occlusion amount in the jailed OA. Therefore, selecting an FD stent with a low EMSA value at the OA inlet may be beneficial for patients with a nearby jailed artery at the aneurysm neck.

摘要

血流导向(FD)支架通过减少流入动脉瘤囊的血流量被广泛用于治疗巨大动脉瘤。然而,当附近的动脉,如眼动脉(OA)被FD支架置入所覆盖时,为患者选择最佳的FD支架可能具有挑战性。本研究比较了两种具有不同有效金属表面积(EMSA)值的FD支架对OA闭塞的影响。

基于临床数据创建了一名59岁患有左侧颈内动脉巨大动脉瘤且眼动脉被覆盖的女性患者的数值模型。在该模型中虚拟植入了两种在动脉瘤颈部和OA入口处具有不同EMSA值的FD支架,即FRED4017和FRED4518。对两种FD支架的OA血流和闭塞量进行了模拟和比较。

FRED4017在动脉瘤颈部处比FRED4518具有更高的EMSA值(35%对24.6%),而在OA入口处具有更低的EMSA值(15%对21.2%)。FRED4017比FRED4518在OA中导致更多的闭塞(40%对28%),表明发生眼部缺血综合征的风险更高。

FD支架的EMSA值会影响被覆盖的OA中的血流和闭塞量。因此,对于动脉瘤颈部附近有被覆盖动脉的患者,选择在OA入口处具有低EMSA值的FD支架可能是有益的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/4d8655fdccb8/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/1047e270f231/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/069dbe3fe652/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/10c2759daad5/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/1203b4338408/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/d10d6d97b195/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/510e136a75c8/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/4d8655fdccb8/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/1047e270f231/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/069dbe3fe652/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/10c2759daad5/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/1203b4338408/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/d10d6d97b195/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/510e136a75c8/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9a/11349421/4d8655fdccb8/10-1055-s-0044-1787868-i2410018-7.jpg

相似文献

1
How Flow Diverter Selection Can Affect the Flow Changes within a Jailed Ophthalmic Artery: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.血流分流器的选择如何影响被困眼动脉内的血流变化:一项计算流体动力学研究
Asian J Neurosurg. 2024 Jun 27;19(3):426-434. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787868. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: complications, aneurysm sac occlusion, reabsorption, recurrence, and jailed branch modification at follow-up.Willis 环以外的复杂分叉动脉瘤的血流导向治疗:随访时的并发症、瘤囊闭塞、吸收、复发和被监禁分支的改变。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 21;131(6):1751-1762. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS18654. Print 2019 Dec 1.
3
Determining flow stasis zones in the intracranial aneurysms and the relation between these zones and aneurysms' aspect ratios after flow diversions.确定颅内动脉瘤中的血流淤滞区以及血流分流后这些区域与动脉瘤纵横比之间的关系。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr;31(2):226-234. doi: 10.1177/15910199231162878. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms.高保真虚拟支架置入:用于复杂颅内动脉瘤血流动力学特征分析的血流导向装置置入建模
J Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;123(4):832-40. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS14497. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Role of terminal and anastomotic circulation in the patency of arteries jailed by flow-diverting stents: from hemodynamic changes to ostia surface modifications.血流导向支架夹闭的动脉通畅性与远侧及吻合口循环的关系:从血流动力学改变到吻合口表面改建。
J Neurosurg. 2017 May;126(5):1702-1713. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.JNS152120. Epub 2016 May 20.
6
Flow diversion of bifurcation aneurysms is more effective when the jailed branch is occluded: an experimental study in a novel canine model.当被栓塞的分支血管被闭塞时,分叉部动脉瘤的血流导向治疗更有效:一项在新型犬类模型中的实验研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Mar;9(3):311-315. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012240. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
7
Evaluating the Effect of the Number of Wire of Flow Diverter Stents on the Nonstagnated Region Formation in an Aneurysm Sac Using Lagrangian Coherent Structure and Hyperbolic Time Analysis.评估使用拉格朗日相干结构和双曲时间分析血流导向支架的丝数对动脉瘤囊中无停滞区形成的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e666-e682. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.116. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
8
Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging findings following flow diversion in patients with complex middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms: a single-center analysis regarding the jailed cortical branches.血流导向装置治疗复杂大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤后磁共振灌注成像表现:关于夹闭皮质分支的单中心分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Dec 19;16(1):8-14. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020124.
9
Comparison of the flow diverter and stent-assisted coiling in large and giant aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score-matched analysis.大型和巨大动脉瘤中血流导向装置与支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的比较:基于倾向评分匹配分析的安全性和有效性
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):2369-77. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4052-1. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
10
Evaluation of Two Fast Virtual Stenting Algorithms for Intracranial Aneurysm Flow Diversion.评价两种用于颅内动脉瘤血流导向装置的快速虚拟支架置入算法。
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2020;17(1):58-70. doi: 10.2174/1567202617666200120141608.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the Effective Metal Surface Area of Two Different Flow Diverter Stents on the Stagnation Region Formation Inside the Aneurysm Sac.两种不同血流导向支架的有效金属表面积对动脉瘤腔内停滞区域形成的影响。
Asian J Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 21;20(1):61-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791842. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining flow stasis zones in the intracranial aneurysms and the relation between these zones and aneurysms' aspect ratios after flow diversions.确定颅内动脉瘤中的血流淤滞区以及血流分流后这些区域与动脉瘤纵横比之间的关系。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr;31(2):226-234. doi: 10.1177/15910199231162878. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
Flow diverter devices in the treatment of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms when surgical and endovascular treatments are challenging.血流导向装置治疗复杂大脑中动脉动脉瘤:手术和血管内治疗面临挑战时的选择。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Dec;31(12):106760. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106760. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Predictors of flow diverter stent in large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms, single-center experience.
大及巨大未破裂颅内动脉瘤血流导向支架置入的预测因素:单中心经验。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6399-6405. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06336-w. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
Flow Diversion for ICA Aneurysms with Compressive Neuro-Ophthalmologic Symptoms: Predictors of Morbidity, Mortality, and Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion.血流导向装置治疗伴有压迫性神经眼科症状的颈内动脉动脉瘤:发病率、死亡率和不完全动脉瘤闭塞的预测因素。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jul;43(7):998-1003. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7550. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: A retrospective long-term single center analysis.血流导向装置治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗:回顾性长期单中心分析。
Neuroradiol J. 2023 Feb;36(1):76-85. doi: 10.1177/19714009221108678. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
6
Incomplete occlusion and visual symptoms of peri-ophthalmic aneurysm after treatment with a pipeline embolization device: a multi-center cohort study.采用Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗后发生眶周动脉瘤不完全闭塞和视觉症状:一项多中心队列研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Aug;164(8):2191-2202. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05239-1. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Flow diverter retreatment for intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis of efficacy and feasibility.颅内动脉瘤的血流导向再治疗:疗效与可行性的荟萃分析
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Feb;30(1):37-42. doi: 10.1177/15910199221095972. Epub 2022 May 3.
8
Two patients of visual disturbance and optic perineuritis after placement of a flow diverter.两名患者在植入血流导向装置后出现视觉障碍和视神经周围炎。
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Mar 3;17(5):1487-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.01.085. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Visual Impairment due to a large paraclinoid aneurysm treated with parent artery occlusion and bypass: A case report.经大脑前动脉闭塞及搭桥术治疗大型床突旁动脉瘤所致视力障碍:一例报告
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Apr;31(4):106280. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106280. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
10
Flow Diversion for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treatment: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review.血流导向装置治疗急性破裂颅内动脉瘤:回顾性研究和文献复习。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Mar;31(3):106284. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106284. Epub 2022 Jan 7.