Khan Muhammad Shayan, Baqi Abdul, Tahir Ayesha, Ghumman Ghulam Mujtaba, Ullah Waqas, Shah Jay, Sattar Yasar, Mir Tanveer, Sheikh Zain, Salman Fnu, Baghal Moaaz, Luthra Kritika, Khatri Vinod, Waqar Zainulabedin, Khan Malik Waleed Zeb, Taleb Mohammed, Ali Syed Sohail
Department of Cardiology, Mercy Saint Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Saint Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA.
Cardiol Res. 2024 Aug;15(4):223-232. doi: 10.14740/cr1625. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
The aim of the study was to determine national estimates for the percentage of all readmissions with demographic features, length of stay (LOS), cost analysis, comorbidities, complications, overall and gender-specific mortality and complications of transcutaneous tricuspid valve replacement/repair (TTVR) vs. open surgical tricuspid valve replacement/repair (open TVR).
Data were extrapolated from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) 2015-19. Of the 75,266,750 (unweighted) cases recorded in the 2015 - 2019 dataset, 429 had one or more of the percutaneous approach codes as per the ICD-10 dataset, and 10,077 had one or more of the open approach codes.
Overall, the number of cases performed each year through open TVR was higher than TTVR, but there was an increased trend towards the TTVR every passing year. TTVR was performed more in females and advanced age groups than open TVR. The LOS and cost were lower in the TTVR group than in open TVR. Patients undergoing TTVR had more underlying comorbidities like congestive heart failure, hypertension, and uncomplicated diabetes mellitus. Overall mortality was 3.49% in TTVR vs. 6.09% in open TVR. The gender-specific analysis demonstrated higher female mortality in the open TVR compared to TTVR (5.45% vs. 3.03%). Male mortality was statistically insignificant between the two groups (6.8% vs. 4.3%, P-value = 0.15). Patients with TTVR had lower rates of complications than open TVR, except for arrhythmias, which were higher in TTVR. Patients undergoing open TVR required more intracardiac support, such as intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella, than TTVR.
TTVR is an emerging alternative to open TVR in patients with tricuspid valve diseases, especially tricuspid regurgitation. Despite having more underlying comorbidities, the TTVR group had lower in-hospital mortality, hospital cost, LOS, and fewer complications than open TVR.
本研究的目的是确定全国范围内经皮三尖瓣置换/修复术(TTVR)与开放性外科三尖瓣置换/修复术(开放性TVR)在所有再入院患者中的人口统计学特征、住院时间(LOS)、成本分析、合并症、并发症、总体及特定性别的死亡率和并发症的百分比估计值。
数据来自2015 - 2019年全国再入院数据库(NRD)。在2015 - 2019年数据集中记录的75,266,750例(未加权)病例中,根据ICD - 10数据集,429例有一个或多个经皮入路编码,10,077例有一个或多个开放入路编码。
总体而言,每年通过开放性TVR进行的病例数高于TTVR,但TTVR每年都有上升趋势。与开放性TVR相比,TTVR在女性和老年人群中实施得更多。TTVR组的住院时间和成本低于开放性TVR。接受TTVR的患者有更多潜在合并症,如充血性心力衰竭、高血压和无并发症的糖尿病。TTVR的总体死亡率为3.49%,而开放性TVR为6.09%。特定性别的分析表明,与TTVR相比,开放性TVR中女性死亡率更高(5.45%对3.03%)。两组之间男性死亡率无统计学差异(6.8%对4.3%,P值 = 0.15)。TTVR患者的并发症发生率低于开放性TVR,但心律失常除外,TTVR中该并发症发生率更高。与TTVR相比,接受开放性TVR的患者需要更多的心内支持,如主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)和Impella。
对于三尖瓣疾病,尤其是三尖瓣反流患者,TTVR是开放性TVR的一种新兴替代方法。尽管有更多潜在合并症,但TTVR组的住院死亡率、住院成本、住院时间更低,并发症也比开放性TVR更少。