• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际疾病分类第九版临床修正版诊断相关分组(ICD-9-CM DRGs):通过使用AS-SCORE提高同质性。

The ICD-9-CM DRGs: increased homogeneity through use of AS-SCORE.

作者信息

Panniers T L, Tomkiewicz Z M

出版信息

QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1985 Feb;11(2):47-52.

PMID:3920601
Abstract

AS-SCORE, applied to DRGs, has the potential for providing a system of case-mix measurement that will be more meaningful to physicians, nurses, and hospital administrators as they attempt to predict their patients' use of hospital resources. Urban hospitals and teaching hospitals may find such a system crucial to adequate reimbursement for the more severely ill patients they treat. The system is easily taught and gives reliable scores. The system is clinically coherent because it takes into account all of a patient's conditions and complications. When combined with a cost accounting system for nursing services, the system is sensitive to patients' nursing care requirements. Further studies should be conducted to determine the applicability of AS-SCORE to other nonhomogeneous medical and surgical groupings of the I-9 DRG system. Not all DRGs may need to be subcategorized by a severity-of-illness measure; some DRGs, for example, contain patients who are very similar, such as those who undergo tonsillectomy or normal vaginal delivery. Thus, if subcategorization by severity is not needed for all DRGs, it may be possible to use the AS-SCORE measure and, at the same time, to keep the number of groups small enough to be manageable. These studies should also be conducted in hospitals in other parts of the country to determine the replicability of the findings despite regional variations in facilities and practice methods.

摘要

应用于诊断相关分组(DRGs)的AS - SCORE有潜力提供一种病例组合测量系统,对于医生、护士和医院管理人员在试图预测患者对医院资源的使用情况时更有意义。城市医院和教学医院可能会发现这样一个系统对于为他们所治疗的病情较重的患者获得足够的补偿至关重要。该系统易于传授且评分可靠。该系统在临床上具有连贯性,因为它考虑了患者的所有病情和并发症。当与护理服务成本核算系统相结合时,该系统对患者的护理需求很敏感。应进行进一步研究以确定AS - SCORE在I - 9 DRG系统的其他非同类医疗和外科分组中的适用性。并非所有DRGs都需要按疾病严重程度进行细分;例如,一些DRGs包含非常相似的患者,如那些接受扁桃体切除术或正常阴道分娩的患者。因此,如果并非所有DRGs都需要按严重程度进行细分,那么有可能使用AS - SCORE测量方法,同时保持分组数量足够少以便于管理。这些研究还应在该国其他地区的医院进行,以确定尽管设施和实践方法存在地区差异,研究结果的可重复性。

相似文献

1
The ICD-9-CM DRGs: increased homogeneity through use of AS-SCORE.国际疾病分类第九版临床修正版诊断相关分组(ICD-9-CM DRGs):通过使用AS-SCORE提高同质性。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1985 Feb;11(2):47-52.
2
Measuring the effect of illness severity on revenue under DRGs.衡量疾病严重程度对诊断相关分组下收入的影响。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1985 Jul;39(7):52-3, 56-60.
3
Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).第2部分,应对预付费制度。诊断相关分组(DRG)的制定与解读。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1984 Feb;38(2):72-4, 78-84.
4
DRG winners and losers affect profits under prospective payment.在按病种付费制度下,疾病诊断相关分组的赢家和输家会影响利润。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1985 Jul;39(7):62-8.
5
Do DRG reimbursement rates reflect nursing costs?疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)的报销费率是否反映了护理成本?
J Nurs Adm. 1985 Jul-Aug;15(7-8):29-35.
6
An economic approach to DRGs: a reimbursement system that limits the costs of hospital care.一种针对诊断相关分组(DRGs)的经济学方法:一种限制医院护理成本的报销制度。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1983 Apr;37(4):86-91.
7
Interhospital differences in severity of illness. Problems for prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).医院间疾病严重程度的差异。基于诊断相关分组(DRGs)的前瞻性支付存在的问题。
N Engl J Med. 1985 Jul 4;313(1):20-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198507043130105.
8
Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.新生儿医学不同疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)分类系统的结构与性能
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):302-18.
9
Medicare payment and DRGs.医疗保险支付与诊断相关分组
Mich Hosp. 1983 Oct;19(10):19-21.
10
Are national DRG rates the best choice for PPS?国家疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)费率是按病种付费(PPS)的最佳选择吗?
Healthc Financ Manage. 1985 Aug;39(8):62-6.