Suppr超能文献

医保报销的针灸治疗腰痛。

Utilization of Reimbursed Acupuncture Therapy for Low Back Pain.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Department of Health Care Management, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2430906. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30906.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Treating low back pain (LBP) often involves a combination of pharmacologic, nonpharmacologic, and interventional treatments; one approach is acupuncture therapy, which is safe, effective, and cost-effective. How acupuncture is used within pain care regimens for LBP has not been widely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To document trends in reimbursed acupuncture between 2010 and 2019 among a large sample of patients with LBP, focusing on demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics associated with acupuncture use and the nonpharmacologic, pharmacologic, and interventional treatments used by patients who utilize acupuncture.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study included insurance claims of US adults in a deidentified database. The study sample included patients diagnosed with LBP between 2010 and 2019. Data were analyzed between September 2023 and June 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in rates of reimbursed acupuncture utilization between 2010 and 2019, including electroacupuncture use, which involves the electrical stimulation of acupuncture needles. Covariates included age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, educational attainment, region, and a chronic LBP indicator. Secondary analyses tracked other nonpharmacologic treatments (eg, physical therapy, chiropractic care), pharmacologic treatments (eg, opioids, gabapentinoids), and interventional treatments (eg, epidural steroid injections).

RESULTS

The total sample included 6 840 497 adults with LBP (mean [SD] age, 54.6 [17.8] years; 3 916 766 female [57.3%]; 802 579 Hispanic [11.7%], 258 087 non-Hispanic Asian [3.8%], 804 975 non-Hispanic Black [11.8%], 4 974 856 non-Hispanic White [72.7%]). Overall, 106 485 (1.6%) had 1 or more acupuncture claim, while 61 503 (0.9%) had 1 or more electroacupuncture claim. The rate of acupuncture utilization increased consistently, from 0.9% in 2010 to 1.6% in 2019; electroacupuncture rates were relatively stable. Patients who were female (male: odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 99% CI, 0.67-0.70), Asian (OR, 3.26; 99% CI, 3.18-3.35), residing in the Pacific region (New England: OR, 0.26; 99% CI, 0.25-0.28), earning incomes of over $100 000 (incomes less than $40 000: OR, 0.59; 99% CI, 0.57-0.61), college educated (high school or less: OR, 0.32; 99% CI, 0.27-0.35), and with chronic LBP (OR, 2.39; 99% CI, 2.35-2.43) were more likely to utilize acupuncture. Acupuncture users were more likely to engage in other nonpharmacologic pain care like physical therapy (39.2%; 99% CI, 38.9%-39.5% vs 29.3%; 99% CI, 29.3%-29.3%) and less likely to utilize prescription drugs, including opioids (41.4%; 99% CI, 41.1%-41.8% vs 52.5%; 99% CI, 52.4%-52.5%), compared with nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, we found that acupuncture utilization among patients with LBP was rare but increased over time. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics were associated with acupuncture utilization, and acupuncture users were more likely to utilize other nonpharmacologic treatments and less likely to utilize pharmacologic treatments.

摘要

重要性

治疗下腰痛(LBP)通常涉及药物、非药物和介入治疗的组合;一种方法是针灸疗法,它安全、有效且具有成本效益。LBP 疼痛管理方案中针灸的使用方式尚未得到广泛研究。

目的

在一个大型 LBP 患者样本中,记录 2010 年至 2019 年期间报销的针灸治疗趋势,重点关注与针灸使用相关的人口统计学、社会经济学和临床特征,以及利用针灸的患者所使用的非药物、药物和介入治疗。

设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究包括在美国一个匿名数据库中投保的成年人的保险索赔。研究样本包括 2010 年至 2019 年期间被诊断为 LBP 的患者。数据分析于 2023 年 9 月至 2024 年 6 月之间进行。

主要结果和措施

2010 年至 2019 年期间报销的针灸治疗利用率的变化,包括电针灸治疗,即针灸针的电刺激。协变量包括年龄、性别、种族和民族、收入、教育程度、地区以及慢性 LBP 指标。次要分析跟踪了其他非药物治疗(例如,物理治疗、脊医护理)、药物治疗(例如,阿片类药物、加巴喷丁类药物)和介入治疗(例如,硬膜外类固醇注射)。

结果

总样本包括 6840497 名患有 LBP 的成年人(平均[标准差]年龄 54.6[17.8]岁;3916766 名女性[57.3%];802579 名西班牙裔[11.7%],258087 名非西班牙裔亚洲人[3.8%],804975 名非西班牙裔黑人[11.8%],4974856 名非西班牙裔白人[72.7%])。总体而言,106485 人(1.6%)有 1 次或更多针灸治疗,61503 人(0.9%)有 1 次或更多电针灸治疗。针灸治疗的利用率持续增加,从 2010 年的 0.9%增加到 2019 年的 1.6%;电针灸的利用率相对稳定。女性(男性:比值比[OR],0.68;99%置信区间[CI],0.67-0.70)、亚洲人(OR,3.26;99%CI,3.18-3.35)、居住在太平洋地区(新英格兰:OR,0.26;99%CI,0.25-0.28)、收入超过 100000 美元(收入低于 40000 美元:OR,0.59;99%CI,0.57-0.61)、受过大学教育(高中或以下:OR,0.32;99%CI,0.27-0.35)和患有慢性 LBP(OR,2.39;99%CI,2.35-2.43)的患者更有可能使用针灸。针灸使用者更有可能接受其他非药物疼痛护理,如物理治疗(39.2%;99%CI,38.9%-39.5%),而不太可能使用处方药物,包括阿片类药物(41.4%;99%CI,41.1%-41.8%),与非使用者相比。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,我们发现 LBP 患者中针灸的使用率很低,但随着时间的推移有所增加。人口统计学、社会经济学和临床特征与针灸的使用相关,针灸使用者更有可能使用其他非药物治疗,而不太可能使用药物治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2edb/11362866/020967341ebe/jamanetwopen-e2430906-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验