• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急救员对适合初级保健的患者转送至急诊部门的看法:一项横断面调查。

Paramedic perceptions of conveying patients to an emergency department who were suitable for primary care: a cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, Australia; and Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Vic, Australia.

Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Prim Health. 2024 Aug;30. doi: 10.1071/PY23204.

DOI:10.1071/PY23204
PMID:39208207
Abstract

Background Ambulance callouts and conveyances continue to increase disproportionately to population growth. This is largely driven by low- and medium-acuity patients who do not require ambulance management. We aimed to estimate the proportion of patients paramedics have conveyed to an emergency department (ED) via ambulance whom they considered suitable for primary care, and understand the barriers that contributed to these decisions. Methods A cross-sectional survey of registered paramedics in Victoria, Australia, was undertaken using an online questionnaire during 2022. Responses are presented using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression was used to identify associations between paramedic characteristics and barriers influencing primary care pathway referral. Results A total of 367 responses were received. Of these, 70% of paramedics reported that at least half of the patients they conveyed to an ED were suitable for a primary care pathway. Paramedics reported high levels of confidence and support for primary care pathways in lieu of transport, however this had no correlation with their self-reported practice. The most common barrier to primary care pathway referral was limited access to a suitable primary care pathway (68%) followed by fear of an internal complaint, litigation or organisational pressure to convey patients to an ED (66%). Paramedics regarded themselves as more supportive of primary care pathway referral than those around them, including their peers, mentors, employers and university. They also reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had increased their personal support for primary care pathways, as well as organisational support from their employer, without corresponding increase in the broader medical and public communities. In fact, paramedics reported the COVID-19 pandemic had decreased support from the public and patients to refer patients to primary care pathways, and 57% of paramedics reported conveying a patient that had declined their primary care referral in the past week. Conclusions Paramedics frequently convey to an ED patients who they believe are appropriate for a primary care pathway. Paramedics face practical barriers such as a lack of available primary care providers and perceived lack of cultural support that contribute to this practice.

摘要

背景

救护车出动和转运的数量继续不成比例地增长,超过了人口的增长。这在很大程度上是由低中度紧急程度的患者推动的,这些患者不需要救护车管理。我们旨在估计通过救护车转送至急诊科(ED)的患者中,有多少被认为适合初级保健,并了解促成这些决策的障碍。

方法

2022 年,澳大利亚维多利亚州的注册护理人员进行了一项横断面调查,使用在线问卷。结果以描述性统计呈现,并使用逻辑回归来确定护理人员特征与影响初级保健途径转介的障碍之间的关联。

结果

共收到 367 份回复。其中,70%的护理人员报告称,他们转送至 ED 的至少一半患者适合初级保健途径。护理人员报告说,他们对替代转运的初级保健途径有高度的信心和支持,但这与他们的自我报告实践没有相关性。初级保健途径转介的最常见障碍是可获得合适的初级保健途径有限(68%),其次是担心内部投诉、诉讼或组织压力要求将患者转至 ED(66%)。护理人员认为自己比周围的人更支持初级保健途径转介,包括他们的同行、导师、雇主和大学。他们还报告说,COVID-19 大流行增加了他们个人对初级保健途径的支持,以及雇主对初级保健途径的组织支持,而公众和医疗社区对初级保健途径的支持并没有相应增加。事实上,护理人员报告说,COVID-19 大流行降低了公众和患者将患者转至初级保健途径的支持,并且 57%的护理人员报告在过去一周中转送了一位拒绝其初级保健转介的患者。

结论

护理人员经常将他们认为适合初级保健途径的患者转送至 ED。护理人员面临缺乏可用的初级保健提供者和感知到的缺乏文化支持等实际障碍,这促成了这种做法。

相似文献

1
Paramedic perceptions of conveying patients to an emergency department who were suitable for primary care: a cross-sectional survey.急救员对适合初级保健的患者转送至急诊部门的看法:一项横断面调查。
Aust J Prim Health. 2024 Aug;30. doi: 10.1071/PY23204.
2
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate.跌倒紧急转诊的支持与评估(SAFER)2:一项整群随机试验以及对新协议临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价,该协议用于紧急救护医护人员评估跌倒后的老年人,并在适当时转诊至社区护理。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(13):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta21130.
3
Developing feasible person-centred care alternatives to emergency department responses for adults with epilepsy: a discrete choice analysis mixed-methods study.为癫痫成人制定可行的以患者为中心的护理替代急诊治疗方案:一项离散选择分析混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(24):1-158. doi: 10.3310/HKQW4129.
4
Chaplaincy and spiritual care in Australian ambulance services: an exploratory cross-sectional study.澳大利亚救护车服务中的牧师关怀与精神护理:一项探索性横断面研究。
J Health Care Chaplain. 2024 Jul-Sep;30(3):202-225. doi: 10.1080/08854726.2024.2323371. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch.针对“非紧急”999急救服务呼叫者的计算机辅助评估与建议:对救护车调度的潜在影响
Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):178-83. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.178.
6
Paramedic identification of acute pulmonary edema in a metropolitan ambulance service.大都市救护服务中护理人员对急性肺水肿的识别。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):339-47. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.773114. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Why do paramedics choose to bring patients to a private emergency department?为什么护理人员会选择将患者送往私立急诊科?
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Apr;31(2):262-265. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13147. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
8
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
9
Prehospital spirituality: how well do we know ambulance patients?院前灵性:我们对救护车患者了解多少?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):356-61. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00001989.
10
Paramedic Checklists do not Accurately Identify Post-ictal or Hypoglycaemic Patients Suitable for Discharge at the Scene.护理人员检查表不能准确识别适合在现场出院的发作后或低血糖患者。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Jun;31(3):282-93. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000248. Epub 2016 Mar 30.