Wen Deborah, Bohlen Hunter, Mahanty Scott, Wang Dean
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine Health, Orange, California, U.S.A.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine Health, Orange, California, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jun;41(6):1871-1878. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
To compare posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements of the medial tibial plateau (MTP) and lateral tibial plateau (LTP) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus computed tomography (CT) to determine the agreement of measurement between imaging modalities.
Patients aged 15 to 65 years with concurrent MRI and CT imaging were initially included. Knees with significant arthrosis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade >2), proximal tibia fracture, or artifact obscuring visualization were excluded. Two independent raters measured PTS of the MTP and LTP on paired MRI and CT. Inter- and intrarater reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intermethod agreement was assessed using ICC and Bland-Altman analyses. An acceptable Bland-Altman limit of agreement (LOA) was set at ±2°, requiring 95% of measurement differences between imaging modalities to fall between ±2° for an acceptable level of agreement.
Forty-six knees in 45 patients met final inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability was good for MRI (ICC 0.78-0.83) and moderate to good for CT (ICC 0.64-0.80) studies. Intrarater reliability was moderate to excellent (ICC 0.64-0.94). Intermethod agreement between MRI and CT was poor at the MTP (ICC 0.34-0.42) and moderate at the LTP (ICC 0.59-0.70). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated high variability of PTS measurements between MRI and CT: 0.16° (95% LOA -6.10° to 6.41°) for MTP for Rater 1; 0.22° (95% LOA -5.01° to 5.45°) for LTP for rater 1; -0.95° (95% LOA -7.22° to 5.33°) for MTP for Rater 2; -0.99° (95% LOA -6.48° to 4.85°) for LTP for rater 2, with only 47.83% to 60.87% of measurement differences falling within the predetermined acceptable LOA of ±2°.
Although the inter- and intrarater reliability was moderate to excellent, the degree of agreement between PTS measurements on MRI and CT was highly variable at both medial and lateral plateaus. Although some variability may have been due to the study's limitations, PTS measurements at individual plateaus may not be interchangeable between MRI and CT.
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
比较磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)上内侧胫骨平台(MTP)和外侧胫骨平台(LTP)的胫骨后倾坡度(PTS)测量值,以确定不同成像方式之间测量结果的一致性。
最初纳入年龄在15至65岁之间同时进行MRI和CT成像的患者。排除有关节严重病变(Kellgren-Lawrence分级>2级)、胫骨近端骨折或有伪影而影响观察的膝关节。两名独立评估者在配对的MRI和CT上测量MTP和LTP的PTS。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估评估者间和评估者内的可靠性。使用ICC和Bland-Altman分析评估不同方法间的一致性。将可接受的Bland-Altman一致性界限(LOA)设定为±2°,要求不同成像方式之间95%的测量差异落在±2°之间,以达到可接受的一致性水平。
45例患者的46个膝关节符合最终纳入标准。评估者间可靠性在MRI研究中良好(ICC 0.78 - 0.83),在CT研究中为中等至良好(ICC 0.64 - 0.80)。评估者内可靠性为中等至优秀(ICC 0.64 - 0.94)。MRI和CT之间在MTP处的不同方法间一致性较差(ICC 0.34 - 0.42),在LTP处为中等(ICC 0.59 - 0.70)。Bland-Altman分析显示MRI和CT之间PTS测量值的变异性较高:评估者1测量MTP时为0.16°(95% LOA -6.10°至6.41°);评估者1测量LTP时为0.22°(95% LOA -5.01°至5.45°);评估者2测量MTP时为 -0.95°(95% LOA -7.22°至5.33°);评估者2测量LTP时为 -0.99°(95% LOA -6.48°至4.85°),只有47.83%至60.87%的测量差异落在预定的±2°可接受LOA范围内。
尽管评估者间和评估者内可靠性为中等至优秀,但MRI和CT上PTS测量值之间的一致性程度在内外侧平台均高度可变。尽管部分变异性可能归因于研究的局限性,但在个体平台上,MRI和CT的PTS测量值可能不可互换。
III级,回顾性队列研究。