School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; State University of Oneonta at New York, Oneonta, NY, United States.
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Nov;120(5):1037-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) comprise most calories in the United States diet. Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are measures of the quality and quantity of carbohydrates in food based on their effect on postprandial blood glucose. Diets high in UPFs and GI/GL are associated with chronic metabolic diseases but the relationship between them is unclear.
Our objective was to examine the GI and GL of foods assigned to NOVA food processing groups. We hypothesized that GI and GL would be lowest in minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to processed food (PRF) and UPF (with no difference between PRF and UPF).
GI and GL values produced by healthy individuals for 1995 food items were collated from published sources. Food items were manually coded by processing levels according to NOVA classification. In addition, as the effects of processing on glycemic potential may vary between types of foods, food items were coded into 8 groups (beans, nuts, and seeds; beverages; dairy; fats and sweets; fruit; grains; fish, meat, and poultry; and vegetables). Multilevel linear modeling was used to determine significance with an α value of 0.05.
The effect of food processing on GI and GL was contrary to our hypothesis as means did not differ significantly across processing levels: GI-MPF: 54.1 ± 19.5, PRF: 53.2 ± 18.9, UPF: 49.3 ± 18.1 (P = 0.712); GL-MPF: 17.1 ± 10.3, PRF: 15.8 ± 12.4, UPF; 11.5 ± 7.9 (P = 0.890). Within food groups, there was no significant association between processing level and GI (P = 0.184), but GL was inversely associated with grains and vegetables (P < 0.001).
Across analyzed foods, GI and GL do not differ between processing levels, whereas GL was lower in ultraprocessed grains and vegetables than MPF. Any potential adverse outcomes associated with UPF are unlikely to be related to effects on glycemia. This project was preregistered at the Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries through the Center for Open Science as 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJWG9.
超加工食品(UPF)在美国饮食中占大部分卡路里。血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)是根据食物对餐后血糖的影响来衡量食物中碳水化合物质量和数量的指标。高 UPF 和 GI/GL 的饮食与慢性代谢性疾病有关,但它们之间的关系尚不清楚。
我们的目的是研究 NOVA 食品加工组分配给食品的 GI 和 GL。我们假设与加工食品(PRF)和 UPF 相比,最低限度加工食品(MPF)的 GI 和 GL 最低(PRF 和 UPF 之间没有差异)。
从已发表的来源中收集了健康个体对 1995 种食品的 GI 和 GL 值。根据 NOVA 分类,食品项目按加工水平手动编码。此外,由于加工对血糖生成潜力的影响可能因食品类型而异,因此将食品项目编码为 8 组(豆类、坚果和种子;饮料;乳制品;脂肪和甜食;水果;谷物;鱼类、肉类和家禽;蔬菜)。使用多层线性模型确定具有 0.05 显著性水平的显著性。
食品加工对 GI 和 GL 的影响与我们的假设相反,因为不同加工水平之间的平均值没有显著差异:GI-MPF:54.1±19.5,PRF:53.2±18.9,UPF:49.3±18.1(P=0.712);GL-MPF:17.1±10.3,PRF:15.8±12.4,UPF:11.5±7.9(P=0.890)。在各个食品组中,加工水平与 GI 之间没有显著关联(P=0.184),但 GL 与谷物和蔬菜呈负相关(P<0.001)。
在所分析的食品中,GI 和 GL 之间在加工水平上没有差异,而超加工谷物和蔬菜的 GL 低于 MPF。与 UPF 相关的任何潜在不良后果不太可能与血糖变化有关。本项目已通过开放科学框架(OSF)在开放科学中心注册,注册号为 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJWG9。