School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
Faculty of Health Services and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2024 Aug 28;34(6):387-396. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2024-0002. Print 2024 Nov 1.
This study aimed to determine energy availability (EA) and within-day energy balance (WDEB) in female soccer players during preseason and also explored eating disorder risk and athlete food choice. We hypothesized commonly used indicators of low energy availability (LEA) risk would correlate with measured EA and WDEB variables, and that food choice determinants would differ according to EA. Eleven National Premier League female soccer players participated in this observational cross-sectional study over 3 weeks. Assessment of resting metabolic rate and physique traits, including bone mineral density, was conducted during Weeks 1 or 3. During Week 2, dietary intake, energy expenditure, and continuous monitor-derived glucose were measured for 5 days. EA was calculated daily and WDEB calculated hourly with deficits/surpluses carried continuously. Questionnaires were administered throughout the 3 weeks, including the Athlete Food Choice Questionnaire, the Eating Disorders Screen for Athletes, and the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire. Resting metabolic rate ratio, bone mineral density, Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire, and Eating Disorders Screen for Athletes scores were used as indicators of LEA risk. EA averaged 30.7 ± 7.5 kcals·kg fat-free mass-1·day-1. Approximately one-third (36%) of athletes were at risk of an eating disorder, while approximately half (45%) were identified at risk of the female athlete triad via Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire, compared with approximately one-third (36%) of athletes identified with EA < 30 kcal·kg fat-free mass-1·day-1. No athlete achieved EA >45 kcal·kg fat-free mass-1·day-1, and no indicator of LEA risk was associated with calculated EA or WDEB. However, overnight glycemic variability was positively correlated with measured EA (r = .722, p = .012).
本研究旨在确定女性足球运动员在赛季前的能量可用性(EA)和日内能量平衡(WDEB),并探讨饮食失调风险和运动员食物选择。我们假设常用的低能量可用性(LEA)风险指标将与测量的 EA 和 WDEB 变量相关,并且根据 EA,食物选择决定因素会有所不同。11 名国家超级联赛女子足球运动员参加了这项为期 3 周的观察性横断面研究。在第 1 或第 3 周进行静息代谢率和体质特征(包括骨矿物质密度)评估。在第 2 周,连续监测器衍生的葡萄糖进行了 5 天的饮食摄入、能量消耗和测量。每天计算 EA,每小时计算 WDEB,并持续计算亏损/盈余。在 3 周内进行了问卷调查,包括运动员食物选择问卷、运动员饮食失调筛查和女性低能量可用性问卷。静息代谢率比、骨矿物质密度、女性低能量可用性问卷和运动员饮食失调筛查得分被用作 LEA 风险的指标。EA 平均为 30.7 ± 7.5 kcals·kg 去脂体重-1·天-1。大约三分之一(36%)的运动员有饮食失调的风险,而大约一半(45%)的运动员通过女性低能量可用性问卷被确定为女性运动员三联征的风险,而大约三分之一(36%)的运动员被确定为 EA < 30 kcal·kg 去脂体重-1·天-1。没有运动员达到 EA >45 kcal·kg 去脂体重-1·天-1,也没有 LEA 风险指标与计算的 EA 或 WDEB 相关。然而, overnight glycemic variability 与测量的 EA 呈正相关(r =.722,p =.012)。