School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2024 Dec;38(4):960-972. doi: 10.1111/scs.13297. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
To evaluate the impact of an eHealth educational resource about infant procedural pain management, given during the prenatal period, on feasibility, acceptability, knowledge, self-efficacy, and involvement.
Routine health care requires newborns to have painful procedures (e.g., intramuscular injection). The impacts of untreated pain in neonates are widely recognised but adoption of effective procedural pain management strategies in clinical practice varies. There is clear evidence supporting the effectiveness of parent-led pain management during procedures (e.g., skin-to-skin care) and reputable resources to raise awareness among parents are warranted. Our team co-created Parenting Pain Away, a website to equip parents with evidence to assist with managing the pain of procedures and empower them to be involved.
A quasi-experimental evaluation using a pre/post intervention design with low-risk expectant parents.
Of the 41 participants, before intervention exposure participants were familiar or had used skin-to-skin care (n = 33), breastfeeding (n = 30) and sucrose (n = 13) as pain management. Most participants (n = 38) desired more information on how to be involved. Providing access to Parenting Pain Away during pregnancy was supported and participants ranked the website above average using the System Usability Scale. Parenting Pain Away did not have a statistically significant influence on outcomes. Participants reported variation in clinical support with parent-led pain management.
A multifaceted approach is recommended to maintain infant procedural pain management.
Equipping parents with knowledge related to infant pain management using an eHealth approach satisfied their information desires. The study findings are important considerations for perinatal care providers, policy makers, and families to finally achieve adequate procedural pain management.
This study used the STROBE checklist, adhering to EQUATOR guidelines.
A stakeholder group (expectant parents, parents, perinatal researchers, clinicians, and administrators) was created to inform the study design and intervention.
评估在产前阶段提供关于婴儿程序性疼痛管理的电子健康教育资源对可行性、可接受性、知识、自我效能和参与度的影响。
常规保健要求新生儿接受有疼痛的程序(例如,肌肉注射)。未治疗的新生儿疼痛的影响已得到广泛认可,但在临床实践中采用有效的程序性疼痛管理策略的情况却各不相同。有明确的证据支持在程序期间进行父母主导的疼痛管理(例如,皮肤接触护理),并且有必要为父母提供提高认识的可靠资源。我们的团队共同创建了“育儿止痛法”(Parenting Pain Away)网站,为父母提供管理程序疼痛的证据,并赋予他们参与的权力。
使用预/后干预设计的准实验评估,针对低风险的准父母。
在干预前暴露阶段,41 名参与者中,有 33 名熟悉或使用过皮肤接触护理,30 名母乳喂养,13 名使用蔗糖作为疼痛管理。大多数参与者(n=38)希望获得更多关于如何参与的信息。在怀孕期间提供对“育儿止痛法”的访问得到了支持,参与者使用系统可用性量表对该网站的评价高于平均水平。“育儿止痛法”对结果没有产生统计学上的显著影响。参与者报告了在父母主导的疼痛管理方面存在不同程度的临床支持。
建议采用多方面的方法来维持婴儿程序性疼痛管理。
使用电子健康方法为父母提供与婴儿疼痛管理相关的知识满足了他们的信息需求。研究结果为围产期护理提供者、政策制定者和家庭最终实现充分的程序性疼痛管理提供了重要的考虑因素。
本研究使用 STROBE 清单,遵循 EQUATOR 指南。
创建了一个利益相关者小组(准父母、父母、围产期研究人员、临床医生和管理人员),为研究设计和干预措施提供信息。