West Eric J, Dixon Derek T, Throckmorton Thomas W, Bernholt David L, Azar Frederick M, Brolin Tyler J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(8):558-566. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.77880.3588.
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has shown success in the treatment of end-stage glenohumeral pathology. However, one major shortcoming has been the lack of internal rotation (IR), which can have significant functional consequences. Much research has been conducted to maximize IR after rTSA, but the literature is unclear which measurement of IR represents the "gold standard" between vertebral level and goniometer-based measurements.
Patients were prospectively enrolled into one of three groups: postoperative from rTSA, subacromial pain (SA), and normal. IR measurements were obtained either by the vertebral body level, by which radiographic markers indicated the highest level that the patient was able to reach on the body midline; or by using a goniometer while the shoulder was in 90-degree abduction as the patient stood upright.
Comparisons between the radiographic vertebral level and goniometer IR measurements showed significant correlations within the normal (r = - 0.43, P = 0.02) and SA pain groups (r = - 0.44, P = 0.02). The rTSA group did not quite reach statistical significance (P = 0.11), but had a moderate correlation coefficient (r = - 0.33). Accuracy of visual IR measurements was also significant. All rTSA group vertebral level measurements were within two vertebral levels, while only 84.6% of IR measurements by goniometer were within 15 degrees. Visual vertebral level measurements were found to be more accurate for the SA pain group (86.2 vs 66.7%).
A comparison of the two primary IR measurement methods for shoulders was shown to have a correlation. This would allow for direct comparison of different literature using only one measurement method. While the correlation is not yet strong enough to allow for conversion between the two measurement types, creating a matched cohort taking into account other factors may lead to the correlation reaching this point.
反式全肩关节置换术(rTSA)已成功用于治疗终末期盂肱关节病变。然而,一个主要缺点是缺乏内旋(IR)功能,这可能会产生重大的功能影响。为了使rTSA术后的内旋功能最大化,人们进行了大量研究,但文献中尚不清楚哪种内旋测量方法是基于椎体水平测量和基于角度计测量之间的“金标准”。
前瞻性地将患者分为三组之一:rTSA术后组、肩峰下疼痛(SA)组和正常组。内旋测量通过椎体水平进行,即通过影像学标记物指示患者能够在身体中线达到的最高水平;或者当患者直立时,在肩关节外展90度时使用角度计进行测量。
影像学椎体水平测量和角度计内旋测量之间的比较显示,正常组(r = - 0.43,P = 0.02)和SA疼痛组(r = - 0.44,P = 0.02)内存在显著相关性。rTSA组未达到统计学显著性(P = 0.11),但相关系数为中等(r = - 0.33)。视觉内旋测量的准确性也很显著。rTSA组的所有椎体水平测量值都在两个椎体水平范围内,而角度计测量的内旋值只有84.6%在15度范围内。发现视觉椎体水平测量对SA疼痛组更准确(86.2%对66.7%)。
两种主要的肩部内旋测量方法的比较显示出相关性。这将允许仅使用一种测量方法对不同文献进行直接比较。虽然这种相关性还不够强,无法在两种测量类型之间进行转换,但考虑到其他因素创建匹配队列可能会使相关性达到这一点。