• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与反式肩关节置换术后活动范围丧失相关的术前因素。

Preoperative factors associated with loss of range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):e621-e628. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.010
PMID:33675967
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a successful procedure, often allowing patients to achieve better range of motion (ROM) compared with their preoperative baseline. However, there is a subset of patients who either fail to improve or lose ROM postoperatively. These patients are at increased risk of poor satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes. To date, characteristics of this subset of patients have not been well described. The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors associated with loss of ROM after primary RTSA.

METHODS

A retrospective review using a commercial international RTSA database (Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA) of patients who underwent primary RTSA between 2007 and 2017 was performed. A total of 123 (7.7%) shoulders lost ≥10° of forward elevation (FE) (group 1, P) and 183 (11.4%) lost ≥10° of external rotation (ER) (group 2, P). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing these patients with control cohorts to evaluate risk factors for loss of motion.

RESULTS

Better preoperative abduction, FE, ER, and internal rotation were each associated with greater loss of FE (P < .001) and ER (P < .001) postoperatively. Higher preoperative Simple Shoulder Test (P < .001, P < .001), Constant (P < .001, P < .001), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (P < .001, P < .001), American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (P < .001), and University of California at Los Angeles (P < .001) scores were also strongly associated with loss of ROM postoperatively. Other factors associated with a higher risk of losing ROM included a diagnosis of irreparable rotator cuff tear (P = .038), rotator cuff arthropathy (P = .017, P ≤ .001), and inflammatory arthropathy (P = .021). After multivariate analysis, higher preoperative FE (P < .001), internal rotation (P = -.018), and weight (P = .008) remained significant predictors of loss of FE. Better preoperative FE (P = .003), ER (P < .001), and University of California at Los Angeles score (P < .001) remained significant predictors of loss of ER. Patients who lost FE or ER were more likely to report lower satisfaction scores than their counterparts who did not lose ROM (P < .001, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with greater preoperative shoulder ROM or higher patient-reported outcomes are at higher risk of losing ROM after primary RTSA. They are also at higher risk of reporting lower postoperative satisfaction, though the majority were still satisfied. Surgeons should strongly counsel patients with well-preserved preoperative function on the risk of loss of ROM.

摘要

背景

反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)是一种成功的手术,通常能使患者术后的活动范围(ROM)较术前基线水平得到改善。然而,有一部分患者术后的 ROM 要么没有改善,要么出现了丢失。这些患者的满意度和患者报告的结局较差的风险增加。迄今为止,尚未很好地描述这部分患者的特征。本研究的目的是确定与原发性 RTSA 后 ROM 丢失相关的危险因素。

方法

使用商业性国际 RTSA 数据库(美国佛罗里达州盖恩斯维尔的 Exactech Inc.)对 2007 年至 2017 年间接受原发性 RTSA 的患者进行回顾性分析。共有 123 个(7.7%)肩部在前向抬高(FE)方面丢失≥10°(组 1,P),183 个(11.4%)在外部旋转(ER)方面丢失≥10°(组 2,P)。通过比较这些患者与对照组的单变量和多变量分析,评估与运动丢失相关的危险因素。

结果

术前更好的外展、FE、ER 和内旋与术后 FE(P <.001)和 ER(P <.001)丢失增加相关。术前 Simple Shoulder Test(P <.001,P <.001)、Constant(P <.001,P <.001)、肩痛和残疾指数(P <.001,P <.001)、美国肩肘外科医生(P <.001)和加州大学洛杉矶分校(P <.001)评分较高也与术后 ROM 丢失强烈相关。与更高的 ROM 丢失风险相关的其他因素包括无法修复的肩袖撕裂(P =.038)、肩袖关节炎(P =.017,P ≤.001)和炎症性关节炎(P =.021)。多变量分析后,术前更高的 FE(P <.001)、内旋(P = -.018)和体重(P =.008)仍然是 FE 丢失的显著预测因素。术前更好的 FE(P =.003)、ER(P <.001)和加州大学洛杉矶分校评分(P <.001)仍然是 ER 丢失的显著预测因素。FE 或 ER 丢失的患者比未丢失 ROM 的患者更有可能报告较低的满意度评分(P <.001,P <.001)。

结论

术前肩部 ROM 较好或患者报告结局较高的患者,在接受原发性 RTSA 后更有可能出现 ROM 丢失。尽管大多数患者仍满意,但他们也更有可能报告术后满意度较低。外科医生应强烈告知术前功能保存良好的患者 ROM 丢失的风险。

相似文献

1
Preoperative factors associated with loss of range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.与反式肩关节置换术后活动范围丧失相关的术前因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):e621-e628. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative rotational stiffness and an intact rotator cuff: a case control study.解剖型与反式全肩关节置换术治疗原发性骨关节炎伴术前旋转僵硬和肩袖完整的临床疗效比较:一项病例对照研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jul;32(7):e355-e365. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.027. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
Clinical outcomes of anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and limited forward elevation.原发性骨关节炎、肩袖完整且前举活动度受限患者行解剖型与反式全肩关节置换术的临床疗效比较。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Dec 1;105-B(12):1303-1313. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B12.BJJ-2023-0496.R2.
4
Prognostic value of the Walch classification for patients before and after shoulder arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.Walch分类法对肩袖完整的骨关节炎患者行肩关节置换术前及术后的预后价值。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jan;33(1):108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.029. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Are Age and Patient Gender Associated With Different Rates and Magnitudes of Clinical Improvement After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?年龄和患者性别与反肩置换术后临床改善的速度和幅度是否相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1264-1273. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000270.
6
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with preservation of the rotator cuff for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis has similar outcomes to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff arthropathy.对于原发性肩峰下撞击症患者,行保留肩袖的反肩关节置换术与全肩关节置换术和肩袖关节病的反肩关节置换术的疗效相似。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6S):S60-S68. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
7
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in wheelchair-dependent patients.依赖轮椅患者的反式全肩关节置换术。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.006. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Deltoid fatigue: a longitudinal assessment of reverse shoulder arthroplasty over time.三角肌疲劳:对反向肩关节置换术随时间推移的纵向评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1375-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.038. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty.初次解剖型全肩关节置换术失败后翻修反置式全肩关节置换术与初次反置式全肩关节置换术临床结果的比较。
JSES Int. 2022 Dec 16;7(2):257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
The effect of body mass index on internal rotation and function following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.体重指数对解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术后内旋和功能的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb;30(2):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Does glenosphere size impact shoulder rotational range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A retrospective cohort study.在反肩关节置换术后,球窝假体大小会影响肩关节的旋转活动范围吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 25;35(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04385-3.
2
Internal Rotation Measurements: Correlation between Vertebral Body Level and Goniometer Measurements on Functional Outcome Scores.内旋测量:椎体水平与角度计测量在功能结局评分上的相关性。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(8):558-566. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.77880.3588.