• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

香港次优母乳喂养的经济评估:婴儿健康结果与成本

An economic evaluation on sub-optimal breastfeeding in Hong Kong: Infant health outcomes and costs.

作者信息

Hui Lai Ling, Liao Emily, Yeung Karene Hoi Ting, Wong Carlos K H, Loganathan Tharani, Nelson Edmund Anthony S

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2025 Jan;114(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/apa.17396. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1111/apa.17396
PMID:39212096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11627454/
Abstract

AIM

This study estimated the healthcare cost savings for the government due to the prevention of gastroenteritis (GE) infections and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in the first year of life, attributed to an increase in the exclusive breastfeeding rate at 4 months in Hong Kong.

METHODS

The model used the best available data inputs, with uncertainty considered using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. We additionally assessed the impact of neonatal jaundice (NNJ) on the economic benefits of increasing exclusive breastfeeding rates.

RESULTS

During 2010-2019, five admissions for GE and three admissions for LRTI per 1000 births would have been prevented in the first year of life if the exclusive breastfeeding rate at 4 months increased from the actual levels (~15-30%) to 50%, resulting in annual healthcare cost savings of USD1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.07) million/year. The cost saving would reach USD1.89 (95% CI 1.86-1.92) million/year if the exclusive breastfeeding rate at 4 months increase to 70%. However, if higher NNJ admissions during 7-90 days related to more exclusive breastfeeding are considered, the cost saving would reduce by 60%.

CONCLUSION

Our findings can guide policymakers in allocating budget and resources for breastfeeding promotion in Hong Kong. The prevention of unnecessary NNJ admissions would maximise the economic benefits of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months.

摘要

目的

本研究估算了香港4个月时纯母乳喂养率上升,在生命的第一年预防胃肠炎(GE)感染和下呼吸道感染(LRTI)给政府带来的医疗成本节省。

方法

该模型使用了可得的最佳数据输入,并通过概率敏感性分析考虑了不确定性。我们还评估了新生儿黄疸(NNJ)对提高纯母乳喂养率经济效益的影响。

结果

在2010 - 2019年期间,如果4个月时的纯母乳喂养率从实际水平(约15 - 30%)提高到50%,每1000例出生中在生命的第一年可预防5例GE住院和3例LRTI住院,每年可节省医疗成本105万美元(95%置信区间103 - 107万美元)。如果4个月时的纯母乳喂养率提高到70%,成本节省将达到每年189万美元(95%置信区间186 - 192万美元)。然而,如果考虑到7 - 9天内与更多纯母乳喂养相关的较高NNJ住院率,成本节省将减少60%。

结论

我们的研究结果可为香港政策制定者在为促进母乳喂养分配预算和资源方面提供指导。预防不必要的NNJ住院将使4个月时纯母乳喂养的经济效益最大化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fc/11627454/bead439c9915/APA-114-65-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fc/11627454/b5fce4a6dd3d/APA-114-65-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fc/11627454/bead439c9915/APA-114-65-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fc/11627454/b5fce4a6dd3d/APA-114-65-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fc/11627454/bead439c9915/APA-114-65-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
An economic evaluation on sub-optimal breastfeeding in Hong Kong: Infant health outcomes and costs.香港次优母乳喂养的经济评估:婴儿健康结果与成本
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Jan;114(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/apa.17396. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
Potential cost-savings of breastfeeding promotion to prevent breast cancer: a Monte Carlo simulation.通过促进母乳喂养预防乳腺癌的潜在成本节约:蒙特卡洛模拟
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Feb 24;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00689-y.
3
The economic benefits of increasing breastfeeding rates in Spain.提高西班牙母乳喂养率的经济效益。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 May 4;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00277-w.
4
A case study on the economic impact of optimal breastfeeding.母乳喂养最优方案的经济影响案例研究
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jan;17(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0942-2.
5
The costs of suboptimal breastfeeding in Ontario, Canada, and potential healthcare resource impacts from improving rates: a pediatric health system costing analysis.加拿大安大略省次优母乳喂养的成本以及提高母乳喂养率对医疗资源的潜在影响:一项儿科卫生系统成本分析
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Feb 22;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13006-025-00702-y.
6
The costs of inadequate breastfeeding of infants in Mexico.墨西哥婴儿母乳喂养不足的成本。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Mar;101(3):579-86. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.092775. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
7
Cost-benefit analysis of a multicomponent breastfeeding promotion and support intervention in a developing country.发展中国家多组分母乳喂养促进和支持干预的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0295194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295194. eCollection 2024.
8
Prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding reduces the risk of infectious diseases in infancy.长期且纯母乳喂养可降低婴儿期感染性疾病的风险。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e18-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3256. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
9
The cost of not breastfeeding in Southeast Asia.东南亚地区不进行母乳喂养的代价。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Oct;31(8):1107-16. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw044. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
10
The Economic Influence of Breastfeeding on the Health Cost of Newborns.母乳喂养对新生儿健康成本的经济影响。
J Hum Lact. 2019 May;35(2):340-348. doi: 10.1177/0890334418812026. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential cost-savings of breastfeeding promotion to prevent breast cancer: a Monte Carlo simulation.通过促进母乳喂养预防乳腺癌的潜在成本节约:蒙特卡洛模拟
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Feb 24;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00689-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK.针对英国旨在促进母乳喂养的孕妇产前和产后教育及支持干预措施的成本效益。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12446-5.
2
Household solid waste management practices and perceptions among residents in the East Coast of Malaysia.马来西亚东海岸居民的家庭固体废物管理实践和认知。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12274-7.
3
First-food systems transformations and the ultra-processing of infant and young child diets: The determinants, dynamics and consequences of the global rise in commercial milk formula consumption.
早期食物系统转型与婴幼儿饮食的超加工:全球商业配方奶粉消费增长的决定因素、动态变化及后果。
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Apr;17(2):e13097. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13097. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
The economic benefits of increasing breastfeeding rates in Spain.提高西班牙母乳喂养率的经济效益。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 May 4;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00277-w.
5
Exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices and mothers' achievement of their planned duration of breastfeeding.婴儿友好医院实践与母亲实现计划母乳喂养时长的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 1;20(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02904-0.
6
Scaling up breastfeeding policy and programs in Samoa: application of the Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly initiative.萨摩亚母乳喂养政策和项目的扩大:实施“促进母乳喂养友好”倡议。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Jan 6;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0245-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Does extending the duration of legislated paid maternity leave improve breastfeeding practices? Evidence from 38 low-income and middle-income countries.延长法定带薪产假时长能否改善母乳喂养情况?来自38个低收入和中等收入国家的证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 11;3(5):e001032. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001032. eCollection 2018.
8
ABM Clinical Protocol #22: Guidelines for Management of Jaundice in the Breastfeeding Infant 35 Weeks or More of Gestation-Revised 2017.美国儿科学会临床协议#22:孕35周及以上母乳喂养婴儿黄疸管理指南——2017年修订版
Breastfeed Med. 2017 Jun;12(5):250-257. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.29042.vjf. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Effect of Financial Incentives on Breastfeeding: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励对母乳喂养的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 5;172(2):e174523. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4523.
10
Family members' infant feeding preferences, maternal breastfeeding exposures and exclusive breastfeeding intentions.家庭成员的婴儿喂养偏好、母亲的母乳喂养经历及纯母乳喂养意愿。
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 4.