Department of Infectious Diseases, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Residència Sant Camil, Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Nov 4;79(11):2858-2866. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae298.
Although a significant number of cases of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) are managed at non-referral community hospitals, the impact of a bundle-of-care intervention in this setting has not yet been explored.
We performed a quasi-experimental before-after study with the implementation of a bundle of care for the management of SAB at five non-referral community hospitals and a tertiary care university hospital. Structured recommendations for the five indicators selected to assess quality of care were provided to investigators before the implementation of the bundle and monthly thereafter. Primary endpoints were adherence to the bundle intervention and treatment failure, defined as death or relapse at 90 days of follow-up.
One hundred and seventy patients were included in the pre-intervention period and 103 in the intervention period. Patient characteristics were similar in both periods. Multivariate analysis controlling for potential confounders showed that performance of echocardiography was the only factor associated with improved adherence to the bundle in the intervention period (adjusted OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.13-4.02). Adherence to the bundle, performance of follow-up blood cultures, and adequate duration of antibiotic therapy for complicated SAB presented non-significant improvements. The intervention was not associated with a lower rate of 90 day treatment failure (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.70-1.77).
A bundle-of-care intervention for the management of SAB at non-referral community hospitals increased adherence to quality indicators, but did not significantly reduce rates of 90 day mortality or relapse.
尽管有相当数量的金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)病例在非转诊社区医院得到治疗,但在这种情况下,护理包干预的效果尚未得到探索。
我们在五家非转诊社区医院和一家三级保健大学医院实施了一项准实验前后研究,对 SAB 的管理实施了护理包干预。在实施护理包之前和之后的每个月,向研究人员提供了针对五个选定指标评估护理质量的结构化建议。主要终点是对护理包干预的依从性和治疗失败,定义为 90 天随访时死亡或复发。
在干预前期间纳入了 170 例患者,在干预期间纳入了 103 例患者。两个时期的患者特征相似。在控制潜在混杂因素的多变量分析中,超声心动图的执行是干预期间提高对护理包依从性的唯一相关因素(调整后的 OR 2.13;95%CI 1.13-4.02)。对后续血培养的执行和复杂 SAB 的抗生素治疗时间的依从性有了非显著的改善。该干预措施与 90 天治疗失败的较低发生率(OR 1.11;95%CI 0.70-1.77)无关。
在非转诊社区医院对 SAB 管理实施护理包干预提高了对质量指标的依从性,但并没有显著降低 90 天死亡率或复发率。